Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MAQASHID : Jurnal Hukum Islam Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner VRISPRAAK, International Journal of Law
Tasliyah Erlina Ramli
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Harmonisasi Muṭlaq dan Muqayyad dalam Istinbat Hukum: Studi Aplikatif pada Regulasi Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia Nur Afifa Maharani; Tasliyah Erlina Ramli; Zaenal Abidin; Fatmawati
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 3 Juli 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i3.1208

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji harmonisasi muṭlaq dan muqayyad dalam regulasi hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia melalui perspektif uṣūl al-fiqh dan maqāṣid al-syarīʻah. Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis konsep harmonisasi muṭlaq dan muqayyad, menjelaskan peran negara sebagai otoritas taqyīd, serta menilai legitimasi metodologis pembatasan hukum dalam regulasi hukum keluarga Islam. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, dan historis. Bahan hukum dianalisis secara deskriptif-analitis melalui teknik harmonisasi norma. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembatasan terhadap poligami, batas usia perkawinan, pencatatan nikah, dan perceraian melalui pengadilan merupakan bentuk taqyīd munfaṣil, yaitu pembatasan yang lahir melalui ijtihad kelembagaan negara tanpa mengubah substansi nash. Pembatasan tersebut merupakan bentuk ijtihad kontekstual negara yang berorientasi pada perlindungan hak, ketertiban sosial, dan realisasi maqāṣid al-syarīʻah.
REKONSTRUKSI WASIAT WAJIBAH KELUARGA MULTIRELIGIUS : Sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hak Keluarga Nur Afifa Maharani; Hesti Rahma; Tasliyah Erlina Ramli; Azman Arsyad; Andi Herawati
MAQASHID Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Mei 2026
Publisher : Malang Prodi. Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, IAI Al-Qolam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35897/maqashid.v9i1.2678

Abstract

Religious difference (ikhtilāf al-dīn) bars non-Muslim family members from inheritance under Islamic law, yet Indonesian Supreme Court jurisprudence has expanded mandatory bequests to protect multireligious families. The Compilation of Islamic Law, however, does not explicitly regulate this expansion, producing legal uncertainty and inconsistent judicial decisions. This study uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. It examines legislation, four Supreme Court decisions, Islamic legal literature, and maqāṣid al-syarī'ah theory to formulate a reconstruction of mandatory bequests as an instrument of legal protection. The reconstruction comprises three components: expanding recipients to non-Muslim family members with lawful blood or marital ties to the deceased, establishing operational normative parameters, and harmonizing Supreme Court jurisprudence with the Compilation of Islamic Law. Situated within the maqāṣid hierarchy of ḍarūriyyāt, ḥājiyyāt, and taḥsīniyyāt, the reconstruction preserves religious difference as an impediment to inheritance while strengthening legal certainty, justice, and public benefit for multireligious families.
Gender-Based Restorative Justice in Religious Courts: Protecting Female Victims of Domestic Violence in Divorce Cases Tasliyah Erlina Ramli; Kurniati; Zulhas'ari Mustafa
VRISPRAAK : International Journal of Law Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : STAI Miftahul Ula Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59689/73mgcx51

Abstract

This article critically examines the application of gender-based restorative justice principles in Religious Court judges' decisions in divorce cases based on domestic violence (KDRT). Despite the existence of adequate legal frameworks, such as Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning Domestic Violence and Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Women's Cases, the gap between legal norms and judicial practice still exists today. This study uses a normative juridical approach through a literature review and synthesis of previous research analyzing Religious Court decisions, supported by an examination of illustrative Religious Court rulings on iddah maintenance and mut'ah in domestic violence-based divorce cases. The results indicate that many Religious Court judges' decisions in domestic violence-based divorce cases remain formalistic, have not fully integrated gender perspectives, and have not considered substantive victim recovery. From the perspective of maqasid al-syariah, protection of life (hifz al-nafs) and protection of offspring (hifz al-nasl) require judges not only to decide on divorce, but also to ensure that victims receive their right to recovery. This study proposes a three-dimensional restoration framework as a normative and practical guide for Religious Court judges to deliver substantive, gender-responsive justice in domestic violence-based divorce cases.
Co-Authors Andi Herawati Azman Azman Fatmawati Hesti Rahma Kurniati Nur Afifa Maharani ZAENAL ABIDIN Zulhas'ari Mustafa