Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MAQASHID : Jurnal Hukum Islam Qisthosia Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Dirosah Islamiyah: Jurnal Studi Islam
Nur Afifa Maharani
Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Maqāṣid Syarī‘ah terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama: An Analysis of the Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah in Relation to Judges' Considerations in Post-Divorce Child Support Rulings in Religious Courts Nur Afifa Maharani; Kurniati; Zulhas’ari Mustafa
QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46870/jhki.v7i1.2284

Abstract

This study examines how maqāṣid syarī‘ah are applied in judicial reasoning on child maintenance after divorce and how they support the protection of children's rights. Using the framework of al-kulliyyāt al-khams, namely the preservation of religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property, the study assesses whether religious court decisions place children's welfare at the center of legal consideration. The research uses a normative legal method, drawing on statutory and case law. It compares three decisions: Decision Number 2487/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Mks, Decision Number 1800/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Pas, and Decision Number 147/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Gtlo. The analysis uses content and comparative analysis to examine the five main objectives of Islamic law. The findings show a shift from formal legal reasoning toward substantive justice in child maintenance cases. The dominant maqāṣid dimensions are ḥifẓ al-nafs, ḥifẓ al-‘aql, and ḥifẓ al-nasl. These include protecting children's basic needs, education, psychological well-being, and continued parental responsibility after divorce. Each decision shows a different pattern. Decision No. 2487/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Mks emphasizes psychological protection and the quality of caregiving. Decision No. 1800/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Pas prioritizes education and living needs based on the father's stable income. Decision No. 147/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Gtlo balances children's needs with the father's financial capacity and regional living costs. However, maintenance awards still rely mainly on the father's financial ability rather than on objectively measured child needs. The study recommends measurable child maintenance guidelines based on age, education, healthcare, living costs, and verified parental income.
Analisis Ushuliyyah terhadap Lafaz Ṣarīḥ dan Kināyah dalam Penetapan Hukum Talak Digital Nur Afifa Maharani; Fatmawati; Zainal Abidin
Dirosah Islamiyah Vol 1 No 3 (2026): Juli
Publisher : Dirosah Islamiyah: Jurnal Studi Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of digital communication technology has transformed the practice of legal communication in Islamic family law, including the pronouncement of divorce (ṭalāq) through electronic media such as WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS, e-mail, and voice note. This phenomenon raises legal issues concerning the interpretation of divorce expressions, the intention of the speaker (qaṣd al-mutakallim), and the evidentiary value of digital communication. This study aims to analyze the application of the theory of dalālah al-alfāẓ to ṣarīḥ and kināyah expressions in digital divorce, examine the role of qaṣd al-mutakallim and digital qarīnah in determining legal consequences, and explore their implications for evidentiary practices in the Indonesian Religious Courts. This research employs normative legal research using a library research approach. Data were collected from classical works of uṣūl al-fiqh, statutory regulations, and recent scholarly publications, and were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. The findings demonstrate that digital media do not alter the legal classification of divorce expressions because legal validity depends primarily on the clarity of linguistic meaning rather than the communication platform. Explicit (ṣarīḥ) expressions directly produce legal consequences, whereas implicit (kināyah) expressions require proof of the speaker's intention supported by authentic digital qarīnah, including chat histories, metadata, voice recordings, screenshots, and digital forensic evidence. The study concludes that the theory of dalālah al-alfāẓ remains methodologically relevant for interpreting digital divorce while providing a systematic framework that integrates classical Islamic legal theory with contemporary digital evidence in Religious Court proceedings.
Harmonisasi Muṭlaq dan Muqayyad dalam Istinbat Hukum: Studi Aplikatif pada Regulasi Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia Nur Afifa Maharani; Tasliyah Erlina Ramli; Zaenal Abidin; Fatmawati
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 3 Juli 2026: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v5i3.1208

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji harmonisasi muṭlaq dan muqayyad dalam regulasi hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia melalui perspektif uṣūl al-fiqh dan maqāṣid al-syarīʻah. Penelitian bertujuan menganalisis konsep harmonisasi muṭlaq dan muqayyad, menjelaskan peran negara sebagai otoritas taqyīd, serta menilai legitimasi metodologis pembatasan hukum dalam regulasi hukum keluarga Islam. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, dan historis. Bahan hukum dianalisis secara deskriptif-analitis melalui teknik harmonisasi norma. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembatasan terhadap poligami, batas usia perkawinan, pencatatan nikah, dan perceraian melalui pengadilan merupakan bentuk taqyīd munfaṣil, yaitu pembatasan yang lahir melalui ijtihad kelembagaan negara tanpa mengubah substansi nash. Pembatasan tersebut merupakan bentuk ijtihad kontekstual negara yang berorientasi pada perlindungan hak, ketertiban sosial, dan realisasi maqāṣid al-syarīʻah.
REKONSTRUKSI WASIAT WAJIBAH KELUARGA MULTIRELIGIUS : Sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hak Keluarga Nur Afifa Maharani; Hesti Rahma; Tasliyah Erlina Ramli; Azman Arsyad; Andi Herawati
MAQASHID Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Mei 2026
Publisher : Malang Prodi. Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, IAI Al-Qolam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35897/maqashid.v9i1.2678

Abstract

Religious difference (ikhtilāf al-dīn) bars non-Muslim family members from inheritance under Islamic law, yet Indonesian Supreme Court jurisprudence has expanded mandatory bequests to protect multireligious families. The Compilation of Islamic Law, however, does not explicitly regulate this expansion, producing legal uncertainty and inconsistent judicial decisions. This study uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. It examines legislation, four Supreme Court decisions, Islamic legal literature, and maqāṣid al-syarī'ah theory to formulate a reconstruction of mandatory bequests as an instrument of legal protection. The reconstruction comprises three components: expanding recipients to non-Muslim family members with lawful blood or marital ties to the deceased, establishing operational normative parameters, and harmonizing Supreme Court jurisprudence with the Compilation of Islamic Law. Situated within the maqāṣid hierarchy of ḍarūriyyāt, ḥājiyyāt, and taḥsīniyyāt, the reconstruction preserves religious difference as an impediment to inheritance while strengthening legal certainty, justice, and public benefit for multireligious families.
Co-Authors Andi Herawati Azman Azman Fatmawati Hesti Rahma Kurniati Tasliyah Erlina Ramli ZAENAL ABIDIN Zainal Abidin Zulhas’ari Mustafa