Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.961
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Almufi Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Journal Science and Theory of law
Tuti Elawati
Universitas Sains Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Hukum Perlindungan Investor Antara Indonesia dan Negara ASEAN dalam Menghadapi Investasi Ilegal Tuti Elawati; La Ode Mbunai; Muhammad Panca Prana Mustaqim Sinaga; Yusuf Suparman
JUSTLAW : Journal Science and Theory of law Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025): JUSTLAW : Journal Science and Theory of Law
Publisher : Universitas Sains Indonesia Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of fraudulent investment schemes across Southeast Asia reflects weaknesses in investor protection frameworks and the ineffectiveness of regulatory oversight over illegal investment activities. This study aims to analyze and compare the legal frameworks for investor protection in Indonesia and selected ASEAN countries, particularly Malaysia and Singapore, in addressing fraudulent investment practices. The research employs a normative juridical approach using comparative legal analysis. The findings indicate that Indonesia has established a legal basis for investor protection through Law No. 8 of 1995 on Capital Markets and supervision by the Financial Services Authority (OJK). However, its implementation and enforcement still face various challenges, such as low investment literacy and weak sanctions against offenders. In contrast, Malaysia and Singapore have adopted stricter regulations through integrated financial supervision and the use of early detection technologies to monitor illegal investment activities. The comparison highlights the need for strengthening supervisory mechanisms, enhancing legal and financial literacy among the public, and promoting regulatory harmonization among ASEAN countries to build an effective and responsive investor protection system in the digital investment era.
Kedudukan Pengaduan Konstitusional dalam Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman Menurut UUD 1945 Syaiful Bahari; La Ode Mbunai; Muhammad Panca Prana Mustaqim Sinaga; Tuti Elawati
JUSTLAW : Journal Science and Theory of law Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025): JUSTLAW : Journal Science and Theory of Law
Publisher : Universitas Sains Indonesia Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Since the 1998 reform, the Indonesian state system has changed a lot, especially after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution. One of the amendments was the Judicial Power. Previously, the Indonesian state system did not recognize constitutional review. There was no mechanism for constitutional review of laws against the 1945 Constitution, because laws were the full authority of the Legislative and the President and could not be sued except through a legislative review mechanism. In the third amendment of the 1945 Constitution, the mechanism for constitutional review of laws against the 1945 Constitution was opened and a new institution was formed, namely the Constitutional Court. In theory and constitutional practice in various countries, the authority of the Constitutional Court is not only judicial review of laws against the 1945 Constitution, but also includes all constitutional review practices, both laws and regulations under the Law and actions of branches of power that are considered to violate or contradict the 1945 Constitution. Unfortunately, the practice of con­stitutional review as a whole has still not been accepted by the MPR and lawmakers. As a result, until now there has been dualism in the constitutional review carried out by the Constitutional Court. Meanwhile, related to constitutional review through the Constitutional Complaint mechanism, it has not yet found a place in the Indonesian state system. This study uses a legislative approach and a historical approach. The study through the legislative approach focuses on the formation of new legal norms and the historical study explains the process and background of the formation of legal institutions.
Kedudukan Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Pasca Pembaruan Kuhap UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 Tri Wahyu Pranoto; Tuti Elawati; Muhammad Panca Prana Mustaqim Sinaga; Zahra Malinda Putri
JUSTLAW : Journal Science and Theory of law Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025): JUSTLAW : Journal Science and Theory of Law
Publisher : Universitas Sains Indonesia Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The reform of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana/KUHAP) has implications for the reconfiguration of investigative authority within the criminal justice system, including the position of Civil Servant Investigators (Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil/PPNS). Normatively, PPNS investigative authority is conferred attributively by sectoral legislation. However, the post-renewal KUHAP continues to place the exercise of PPNS investigative authority within a framework of coordination and supervision by police investigators that has not been formulated in a limiting and clear manner. This condition gives rise to juridical issues concerning the clarity of PPNS’s position and the boundaries of its authority within the integrated criminal justice system. This study aims to analyze the position of PPNS following the renewal of the KUHAP and its implications for the principles of legal certainty and functional differentiation among law enforcement authorities. The research employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the renewed KUHAP has not yet fully provided normative clarity in structuring investigative authority, as the existing regulatory construction does not offer adequate normative guarantees for the realization of a functional and equal configuration of investigative authority for PPNS. Therefore, it is necessary to reinforce regulatory provisions within the KUHAP that place PPNS as a subsystem of investigation with functional autonomy, within the limits of attributive authority granted by sectoral legislation, in order to ensure legal certainty and the effectiveness of criminal law enforcement.
Kepastian Hukum Akta Otentik Peralihan Saham Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Undang – Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Batam Nomor: 148/Pdt.G/2023 Pn. Btm Jo Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 399 K/Pdt/2025) Fransiska Imelda; Zulfikar Judge; Dyah Permata Budi Asri; Annisa Fitria; Tuti Elawati
Almufi Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 2 No 3: November (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Almubarak Fil Ilmi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63821/ash.v2i3.559

Abstract

Penelitian ini berangkat dari permasalahan peralihan saham dalam suatu perseroan yang dilakukan tanpa penyetoran modal secara nyata oleh pihak yang tercatat sebagai pemegang saham. Kondisi tersebut menimbulkan ketidaksesuaian antara Daftar Pemegang Saham secara formal dan keadaan materiil yang sebenarnya, yang berdampak pada keabsahan keputusan RUPS Luar Biasa sebagaimana tercantum dalam Akta Nomor 1 tanggal 1 Agustus 2022. Tujuan penelitian adalah menganalisis kedudukan hukum peralihan saham menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 apabila tidak disertai penyetoran modal, serta implikasi Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 399 K/Pdt/2025 terhadap kepastian hukum akta RUPS tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori perjanjian dan teori kepastian hukum dengan metode yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peralihan saham tanpa penyetoran modal tidak memenuhi syarat objektif perjanjian sehingga tidak menimbulkan akibat hukum terhadap kepemilikan saham. Putusan Mahkamah Agung menegaskan bahwa akta RUPS tetap sah secara formil, namun keputusan yang bersumber dari kepemilikan saham tidak sah kehilangan legitimasi hukum. Disarankan agar pengurus perseroan melakukan verifikasi ketat atas data kepemilikan saham sebelum penyelenggaraan RUPS.
Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Akibat Pembatalan Homologasi Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Budi Lestari; Markoni; Zulfikar Judge; Annisa Fitria; Tuti Elawati
Almufi Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 2 No 3: November (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Almubarak Fil Ilmi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63821/ash.v2i3.579

Abstract

Pemenuhan perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur dalam mekanisme Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang menjadi masalah penting dalam praktik penyelesaian sengketa utang-piutang di Indonesia, terutama ketika rencana perdamaian yang telah dihomologasi tidak dijalankan oleh debitor sehingga memicu pengajuan pembatalan homologasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pencegahan kerugian kreditur akibat pembatalan homologasi berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Niaga. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan teori Perlindungan Hukum dan teori Kepastian Hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual. Hasilnya adalah pengaturan mengenai perlindungan kreditur dalam pembatalan homologasi telah tersedia dalam UU Kepailitan dan PKPU, namun belum sepenuhnya memberikan perlindungan substantif karena masih adanya celah normatif terkait standar penilaian hakim, kriteria pelanggaran material, dan mekanisme keberatan kreditur. Selain itu, mekanisme pencegahan kerugian kreditur melalui peran hakim, pengurus, kurator, serta klausul perjanjian perdamaian belum berjalan optimal akibat kurangnya pedoman teknis yang komprehensif. Kesimpulannya, perlindungan hukum kreditur dalam pembatalan homologasi secara normatif telah tersedia tetapi belum ideal dalam implementasinya, sehingga diperlukan penguatan norma serta optimalisasi peran lembaga peradilan. Saran yang diberikan adalah perlunya peningkatan pengawasan hakim terhadap substansi perdamaian dan reformulasi norma untuk mempertegas jaminan perlindungan kreditur.
Analisis Yuridis Pemenuhan Keadilan Bagi Pekerja Terdampak Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/Puu-Xxi/2023 Fernando Lahea; Markoni; Zulfikar Judge; I Made Kantikha; Tuti Elawati
Almufi Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 2 No 3: November (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Almubarak Fil Ilmi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63821/ash.v2i3.581

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh maraknya pemutusan hubungan kerja pasca berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023, yang berdampak signifikan terhadap hak-hak pekerja dan stabilitas hubungan industrial. Rumusan masalah dari penelitian ini yaitu pemenuhan keadilan bagi pekerja yang terdampak PHK pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teori keadilan dan teori perlindungan hukum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Adapun hasil penelitiannya menunjukkan bahwa pemenuhan hak pekerja pasca pemutusan hubungan kerja belum sepenuhnya memenuhi prinsip keadilan substantif maupun prosedural. Jaminan Kehilangan Pekerjaan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi memberikan perlindungan tambahan, namun masih terdapat ketimpangan, terutama bagi pekerja Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu dan pencari nafkah tunggal. Kesimpulannya adalah pemenuhan hak pekerja pasca PHK dan Putusan MK Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023 menunjukkan perlindungan hukum masih belum optimal, terutama bagi pekerja rentan dan PKWT. Sarannya Pemerintah perlu memperkuat implementasi JKP dan mekanisme PHK yang adil, memastikan perlindungan pekerja rentan serta transparansi prosedural. Sementara pengusaha disarankan menerapkan praktik PHK yang manusiawi dan berkeadilan, termasuk pembayaran pesangon sesuai ketentuan, serta mendorong dialog bipartit untuk menjaga stabilitas hubungan industrial dan memperkuat kepercayaan pekerja.
Co-Authors Annisa Fitria Budi Lestari Dyah Permata Budi Asri Fernando Lahea Fransiska Imelda I Made Kantikha La Ode Mbunai Markoni Markoni Muhammad Panca Prana Mustaqim Sinaga Syaiful Bahari Tri Wahyu Pranoto Yusuf Suparman Zahra Malinda Putri Zulfikar Judge Zulfikar Judge