Fadzil, Rozlinda Mohamed
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Upholding Judicial Independence through the Practice of Judicial Activism in Constitutional Review: A Study by Constitutional Judges Ardhanariswari, Riris; Nursetiawan, Eko; Amalia, Syarafina Dyah; Cahyani, Enny Dwi; Fadzil, Rozlinda Mohamed
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 6 Issue 2 (2023) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v6i2.9565

Abstract

The practice of judicial activism, though not formally defined within the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court (MK), is implicitly recognized as an integral element of independent judicial power. The importance of this independence is underscored as a fundamental necessity for the preservation of law and justice. This research utilized a normative juridical methodology, incorporating conceptual, comparative, and case-based analysis. The study findings reveal that judicial activism, as practiced within the Constitutional Court, is underpinned by independent judicial authority. Moreover, this practice aligns with the tenets of progressive legal doctrines, which not only acknowledge the significance of codified legal provisions but also endorse legal innovations for the pursuit of justice. The practice of judicial activism within the Constitutional Court is indispensable for reinforcing the principle of checks and balances. The subjective and abstract nature of judicial activism, however, necessitates objective validation through the principle of virtue jurisprudence.
Enhancing SDGs Desa Implementation for Human Right Fulfillment in Banyumas Regency: An Empirical Judicial Analysis Ardhanariswari, Riris; Azzahro, Fathimah; Fauzan, Muhammad; Fadzil, Rozlinda Mohamed; Hariyanto, Hariyanto
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Navigating Legal Landscapes: Exploring Justice Development in Indonesia and the
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4581

Abstract

Sustainable Development Goals Desa (SDGs Desa) are integrated efforts of village development to accelerate the achievement of sustainable development goals. Since 2021, the village government in Banyumas Regency has implemented SDGs Desa program with an achievement score of 46.94. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the implementation of SDGs Desa and increase the achievement of the program by optimizing the role of experts to fulfill human rights in Banyumas Regency. An empirical juridical method was adopted using primary data in the form of FGDs, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation studies. Furthermore, FGD was conducted with representatives of officials from 49 villages and the data was in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the SDGs Desa program was implemented in line with the village even though there were obstacles in the data collection process. These comprised server errors, and inadequate internet network conditions, including village government knowledge related to minimal system use. Conceptually, this program has similarities with the Saansad Adarsh Gram Yojana (SAGY) program in India. Future studies could be performed because the regulations regarding villages and their derivatives regulated SDGs Desa including planning, implementation, and development mechanisms. Expert assistance was also important for increasing community participation and optimizing budget allocation to harness income sources and realize their full potential.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Penyalahgunaan Artificial Intelligence dalam Tindak Pidana di Indonesia: Kecerdasan Buatan Junaidi, Junaidi; Fadzil, Rozlinda Mohamed; Vejasak, Tharin Phanuphong
UIR Law Review Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2026.vol10(1).24400

Abstract

Basically, artificial intelligence (AI) is a program or machine created by humans that aims to mimic human abilities in various types of tasks. Considering that Indonesia does not yet have specific regulations regarding AI, the ability of AI to act like humans raises legal issues, especially when AI commits criminal acts that harm others. The research method used is normative juridical research, which employs a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Laws and regulations related to the subject of the research are evaluated through a legislative approach. The analysis results show that AI can only be considered as a legal object in Indonesian positive law. Humans are absolute legal subjects and possess awareness and intent in actions carried out through AI, the creators and users of AI are responsible for AI's actions in criminal law