Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.953
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Kudus) Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi ABSIS : Mathematics Education Journal Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Jendela Matematika Mathematics Education Journal Diophantine Journal of Mathematics and Its Applications AKSIOMA
Fitrianti, Yuli
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The Ability to Prove Real Analysis Problems:  Investigation with APOS Conception Afgani, Muhammad Win; Paradesa, Retni; Fitrianti, Yuli
Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 16 No 2 (2026): Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan matematika (Agustus 2026)
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/edumatica.v16i2.52319

Abstract

Proving is an important ability for pre-service mathematics teachers, but previous studies have rarely examined it in Real Analysis using the APOS framework, which is essential for revealing their cognitive development in constructing mathematical proofs. Real Analysis is one of the courses that develops proving ability, but their level of ability in prove problems based on the APOS conception remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to analyze pre-service mathematics teachers’ proving ability in real analysis based on the APOS conception framework. This study uses a qualitative approach with 59 university students as participants. Data were collected from a test with four proof problems designed to represent different levels of reasoning in Real Analysis. The data were then analyzed using content and thematic analysis techniques guided by APOS indicators (action, process, object, and schema) to identify students’ cognitive structures in proving. The results indicate that students proved the problem without deep reflection. They did not recognize which method was required. They used some examples to prove a statement. They had not yet encapsulated the process of proof as a conceptual object. Thus, this study concludes that the ability of pre-service mathematics teachers to prove Real Analysis problems using the APOS conception approach was that most of them are still in the action conception, only a few have reached the process conception, and none have fulfilled the object and schema conception. These findings indicate that most students operate at the action level, relying on procedural manipulation without conceptual understanding, while only a few demonstrate process-level thinking by beginning to internalize proof structures. This suggests that students’ difficulties stem from a lack of conceptual understanding and insufficient experience in constructing formal proofs. Therefore, the curriculum should be designed to strengthen prerequisite abilities before studying Real Analysis and to develop a learning model that enables students to prove various Real Analysis problems. This condition reflects the need for instructional strategies that facilitate the transition from action to higher APOS levels.
Co-Authors Abdullah, Anisyah Amaliah, Suci Arvin Efriani Cahyani, Icha Della, Dhea Salsa Febriyanti, Quratul Aini Feli Ramury Harisman Nizar Hartatiana Hartatiana Hestuti, Peni Junia, Junia Liana Septy, Liana Muhammad Win Afgani Nurjana Nurjana, Nurjana Retni Paradesa Rullah, Nabil SAPUTRAMA, RENDI Syutaridho