Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Analysis of Consistency The REEDA Scale in Healing Second-Degree Perineal Lacerations Yuniarti, Yuniarti; Pramono, Noor; Cahyono, Bambang; Sera, Agnescia Clarissa
JURNAL INFO KESEHATAN Vol 23 No 1 (2025): JURNAL INFO KESEHATAN
Publisher : Research and Community Service Unit, Poltekkes Kemenkes Kupang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31965/infokes.Vol23.Iss1.1645

Abstract

Many studies of perineal wounds use the redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge, and approximation (REEDA) scale as a healing assessment tool. Still, this tool has not become part of the standard of care in postpartum women with perineal lacerations due to the lack of evidence of its validity. This study aimed to analyze the consistency of the REEDA scale in healing perineal wounds of postpartum women. The method uses an observational study using the interrater reliability test for the REEDA tool on perineal wound healing in postpartum women with second-degree perineal lacerations, 11 women were recruited using consecutive sampling. Lacerations were observed by researchers, and midwives were trained on days 1, 3, and 7 postpartum. Cohen's kappa coefficient test was used to test the consistency of the REEDA scale. The results shows that the fair and excellent agreement on the redness item with kappa (0.57-1.00), agreement on the edema item showed good and excellent results (0.61-0.84), fair and good agreement on the ecchymosis item (0.51- 0.73), good and excellent agreement on discharge items (0.79 -1.00). On the approximation item (0.62–1.00), agreement improved to excellent at the final assessment. In the third evaluation, the scoring of all items showed good or excellent agreement between the raters.  The conclusion is  the overall assessment shows that the application of the REEDA scale is reliable because it shows consistency; namely, there are no more values with low agreement on the seventh day of the postpartum period.
Factors associated with running out of food in the households during COVID-19 in Indonesia: Analysis RGA UN Women data 2021 Mamahit, Adi Yeremia; Sera, Agnescia Clarissa; Amaliah, Lili; Maretalinia, Maretalinia; Prayitno, Tommi
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 9 No SpecialIssue (2023): UNRAM journals and research based on science education, science applic
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v9iSpecialIssue.5988

Abstract

The issue of food insecurity during COVID-19 has occurred around the world, including in Indonesia. This study focused on factors associated with running out of food in the households as the outcome. The objective of this study was to examine the variables associated with running out of foods during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This study used secondary data RGA from UN Women website to explore univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis. The results revealed that the main factors influencing running out of foods are five variables such as worries would not having enough food to eat, being unable to eat healthy and nutritious food, eating only a few kinds of foods, eating less than enough, and being hungry but did not eat. There are two variables that revealed moderate correlation such as skipping a meal and going without eating for a whole day. The strongest variable is HH’s head reported were hungry but did not eat which were 5.48 times more likely to run out of foods during the pandemic. Intervention and collaboration with other stakeholders need to be arranged well to prevent the severity food insecurity. Â