Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.945
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Analis Kesehatan JPP Jurnal Kesehatan Poltekkes Palembang JURNAL SKALA HUSADA: THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH JMLS: Journal of Medical Laboratory and Science Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases Prevention and Control
Harianja, Sri Hartini
Unknown Affiliation
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Dentistry Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
DIFFERENCE IN PLATELET COUNT BETWEEN PLATELET APHERESIS AND PLATELET-RICH PLASMA (TC PRP) AT Dr. MOHAMMAD HOESIN CENTRAL GENERAL HOSPITAL PALEMBANG harianja, sri hartini; Damiyanti, Sinta; Refai, Refai; Yusneli, Yusneli; Dan, Hamril
Journal of Medical Laboratory and Science Vol 5 No 2 (2025): JMLS: Journal of Medical Laboratory and Science
Publisher : Jurusan Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Poltekkes Kemenkes Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36086/medlabscience.v5i2.3692

Abstract

Background: Platelet transfusion is an essential medical intervention for patients with thrombocytopenia or abnormalities in hemostasis. Therefore, understanding the quality of platelet components used for transfusion is crucial, including evaluating the platelet count in each unit. According to data from the Blood Transfusion Unit (UTDRS) at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang in 2024, out of a total platelet requirement of 2,904 units, 13,264 units of TC-PRP and 1,540 units of Platelet Apheresis were transfused. Objective: To determine the differences in platelet counts between Platelet Apheresis and Platelet Rich Plasma (TC-PRP) units at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang. Methods: This study was a laboratory-based observational analytic study with a comparative approach. The samples consisted of 20 TC-PRP units and 20 Platelet Apheresis units, selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using the Independent Sample T-Test. Results: The statistical analysis showed a p-value of 0.000 (p < 0.05), indicating a significant difference in platelet counts between Platelet Apheresis and TC-PRP units. Conclusion: The study concluded that the quality of platelet components, based on platelet count, is higher in Platelet Apheresis compared to TC-PRP. Recommendation: Clinicians may prefer platelet apheresis in therapy to achieve more optimal benefits, especially when adequate doses of TC-PRP are difficult to obtain.
Co-Authors Abda Abda Berliani, Zaenab Damiyanti, Sinta Dan, Hamril Dani, Hamril Febriyani, Erisa Garini, Ardiya Karwiti, Witi Latifah, Aminahtun Lestari, Tarisa Suma Lestari, Wuni Sri Listiani, Yenni Nizar, Mardyana Nur Ramadhani, Qurotul Aini Nurhayati Nurhayati Oktavia, Tiara SEPTI WULANDARI Siregar, Sri Sulpha Swarsa, Rachma Dhini Syailendra, Anton Triwahyuni, Irnanti Widiawati Widiawati, Widiawati Yusneli, Yusneli