Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Pentingnya Pendidikan Moral bagi Remaja di Era Digital untuk Interaksi yang Positif di Masyarakat Trisna, Nila; Muharrir, Muharrir; Moulia, Nouvan; Jalaluddin, Jalaluddin; Zulfikar, Muhammad Nahyan; Yuana, Adella; Munandar, Agung
Lok Seva: Journal of Contemporary Community Service Vol 4, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/lok seva.v4i1.12357

Abstract

This community service activity was held on Sunday, November 26, 2023, at SOS Children’s Village Meulaboh by the Faculty Team of the Law Department, Universitas Teuku Umar. The purpose was to provide adolescents with an understanding of the importance of moral education in the digital era. The material covered basic moral concepts, the positive and negative impacts of technology on adolescent behavior, and the urgency of digital ethics in daily life. The results showed that most participants had not fully understood the impact of technology on morality, especially regarding cyberbullying, addiction, and the decline of direct social interaction. In fact, moral behavior is essential not only in digital spaces but also as a foundation for healthy relationships in society. On the other hand, technology also provides positive opportunities for accessing information, self-expression, and expanding social connections. Therefore, contextual moral education is key to shaping digitally literate, ethical, and socially responsible youth. This activity is expected to be a starting point for raising awareness and encouraging adolescents to apply moral values in their daily lives, both online and offline. Thus, the younger generation can grow into individuals who are morally grounded and digitally competent.
IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 31 AYAT (1) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL PADA PERKARA PEMERKOSAAN ANAK YANG DIPUTUS OLEH MAHKAMAH SYAR’IYAH MEULABOH Hilmy, Muhammad; Moulia, Nouvan
Jurist Argumentum: Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi Pasal 31 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (UU TPKS) terkait hak restitusi bagi anak korban perkosaan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Meulaboh Nomor 10/JN2022/MS.Mbo, serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang menghambat implementasinya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif-empiris dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara dengan hakim Mahkamah Syar’iyah Meulaboh, jaksa Kejaksaan Negeri Meulaboh, serta Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak (DP3A) Aceh Barat, yang kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi Pasal 31 UU TPKS mengenai restitusi bagi anak korban kekerasan seksual dalam kasus Nomor 10/JN2022/MS.Mbo belum berjalan; korban tidak menerima restitusi meskipun hak tersebut diatur dalam UU TPKS dan Qanun Jinayat. Faktor-faktor penghambat implementasi restitusi meliputi kurangnya pemahaman korban dan keluarga mengenai hak restitusi, aparat penegak hukum (jaksa dan hakim) yang tidak secara proaktif memberitahukan hak tersebut kepada korban, pertimbangan kondisi ekonomi pelaku, serta adanya misinterpretasi dan benturan persepsi antara UU TPKS dengan praktik pemahaman Qanun Jinayat oleh aparat penegak hukum lokal. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah restitusi belum terimplementasi dalam kasus yang dikaji karena berbagai kendala tersebut, yang menunjukkan perlunya sosialisasi dan pemahaman yang lebih baik mengenai hak korban serta sinergi antar aparat penegak hukum.
The Role of the Aceh Customary Council in Implementing Hak Langgeh: Navigating Between Sharia and Customary Law Trisna, Nila; Aulia, Muhammad Reza; Moulia, Nouvan
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasiv.5i1.27254

Abstract

Aceh, as a region with special autonomy, possesses distinctive authority in implementing Islamic law and customary practices, as stipulated in Law No. 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh. Among these is Hak Langgeh (Syuf’ah), a customary right derived from Islamic legal traditions and constitutionally recognized. However, discrepancies exist between the normative legal framework and its practical implementation, particularly in land transactions. This study aims to examine the legal status of Hak Langgeh within Aceh’s legal system and to analyse the constitutional and institutional role of the Aceh Customary Council (Majelis Adat Aceh/MAA) in protecting and enforcing this right. Employing a juridical-empirical method with descriptive analysis, the research draws on primary data gathered through interviews with traditional leaders, MAA representatives, village (Gampong) authorities, and parties involved in land disputes. The findings indicate that the MAA plays a significant role in promoting indigenous rights, yet its impact is hindered by limited institutional resources and unclear legal mandates. The study concludes that while the MAA has a constitutional basis in strengthening customary norms, its practical role remains constrained. Reinforcing the legal recognition of Hak Langgeh, enhancing the institutional capacity of the MAA, and harmonizing customary law with Islamic Sharia and national legislation are essential for achieving an integrated and constitutionally aligned legal order in Aceh
PENGUASAAN HARTA WARISAN OLEH SEBAGIAN AHLI WARIS DI DESA ALUE BARO KECAMATAN MEUKEK ACEH SELATAN MENURUT PERSPEKTIF KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM Fauzi, Fakhrul; Moulia, Nouvan
Jurist Argumentum: Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In Alue Baro village, Meukek subdistrict, South Aceh Regency, a case of inheritance issues was found, where some heirs unilaterally controlled the inheritance left by their parents and did not give shares to other heirs. In this case, the position is occupied by a substitute heir, who is the son of the heir who should have received the inheritance from the testator. His father's position to receive the inheritance was transferred to the testator's grandson because the original heir had passed away before the testator. This substitute heir is often referred to as "Anak patah titi" (broken bridge child). In this case, the distribution of inheritance was carried out according to customary law, so the substitute heir was not given their rights because they were considered to have severed ties with the testator ("Patah titi"). This research uses an empirical juridical research method. Primary data was collected through direct interviews in the field, while secondary data was obtained through literature review. This research aims to identify and explain two key aspects: first, the reasons behind the unilateral control of inheritance by some heirs while denying the substitute heir's rights. Second, it examines the perspective of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) on this practice. The research findings indicate that the actions of the heirs who unilaterally control the inheritance and do not give it to the testator's grandchild as a substitute heir in Alue Baro village, Meukek subdistrict, South Aceh, are based on the assumption that the grandchild is not entitled to the inheritance from the testator because their father, as the primary heir, had passed away earlier. This practice refers to local customary law that recognizes the "Patah titi" law in inheritance matters. According to the perspective of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), which applies to muslim communities in Indonesia, the act of unilaterally controlling inheritance by heirs as occurred in Alue Baro Village is contrary to Article 185 of the KHI. The KHI grants substitute heirs the right to receive inheritance from the testator as long as they meet the requirements. Furthermore, the inheritance share received by the substitute heir is equal to the right that should have been received by the person they replaced.