Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.024
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Social Service and Research Journal Of World Science INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Rechtsnormen Journal of Law Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean
Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Metafisika Hukum Pemilu: Refleksi Filosofis Terhadap Konsep Pelanggaran Dalam Konteks Pemilihan Umum Meidiawaty, Fusia; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i3.10442

Abstract

Sistem demokrasi didasarkan pada pemilihan umum. Namun, proses ini sering kali rentan terhadap pelanggaran yang membahayakan integritas dan legitimasi demokrasi. Penelitian ini mengkaji pelanggaran metafisika UU Pemilu dan kualitas demokrasi. Pelanggaran dan dampaknya terhadap demokrasi diformulasikan dalam metafisika UU Pemilu. Penelitian ini mengkaji literatur UU Pemilu, filsafat hukum, dan teori demokrasi dengan menggunakan metodologi kualitatif-filosofis. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif-analitik untuk menyelidiki makna, pelaksanaan, dan konsekuensi filosofis dari pelanggaran pemilu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelanggaran merupakan penyimpangan ontologis, epistemologis, dan aksiologis yang rumit dari norma-norma hukum. Topik ini juga mencakup klasifikasi pelanggaran pemilu, interpretasi dan pembuktian hukum, serta peran dan kewajiban penyelenggara, peserta, dan pengawas pemilu. Pelanggaran pemilu merusak legitimasi pemilu dan kepercayaan terhadap demokrasi. Oleh karena itu, tindakan yang terkoordinasi dan terfokus sangat penting untuk mengurangi pelanggaran dan memajukan demokrasi. Kesimpulan ini menekankan perlunya memperkuat pengawasan dan penegakan hukum, kesadaran masyarakat, partisipasi masyarakat sipil dan media independen, serta mekanisme pengawasan internal untuk meningkatkan integritas dan legitimasi pemilu dan membangun kepercayaan publik terhadap demokrasi.
The Legal Dilemma of Abortion in Addressing Social Stigma and the Uncertainty of Access to Legal Abortion Services in Indonesia Fitri, Selvi Relita; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 1 No. 5 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v1i5.1747

Abstract

Background. Abortion in Indonesia is a complex legal issue that involves a delicate balance between protecting women’s reproductive rights and adhering to prevailing social and cultural values. While certain legal provisions allow abortion in cases such as medical emergencies or rape, the practical implementation of these policies is often hindered by legal uncertainties, social stigma, and limited access to safe and legal abortion services. Purpose. This article aims to explore the legal dilemmas surrounding abortion in Indonesia, highlight the challenges women face in accessing reproductive health services, and analyze the existing government policies that affect women’s rights in this context. Method. The research adopts a qualitative approach, reviewing relevant legal documents, policies, and case studies to assess the legal framework surrounding abortion in Indonesia. It also examines the social and cultural factors that influence the accessibility and implementation of abortion services. Results. The study reveals that despite legal provisions allowing abortion under specific circumstances, women in Indonesia continue to face significant barriers in accessing safe and legal abortion services. Legal uncertainty, social stigma, and the lack of awareness about reproductive rights contribute to the difficulties women experience in obtaining necessary healthcare. The analysis shows that current policies are insufficient to fully protect women’s reproductive rights and ensure access to safe abortion services. Conclusion. It is crucial to establish clear, equitable policies regarding abortion and reproductive health services. Additionally, public education campaigns are necessary to reduce stigma and increase awareness of women’s rights. Clear regulations, alongside efforts to inform and educate the public, are key to ensuring that women have access to safe, legal, and equitable reproductive healthcare.
Problems of Legal Efforts to Resist Execution in District Courts and High Courts up to Cassation and Judicial Review Haikal, Ahmad; Israhadi, Evita Isretno
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 1 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v1i6.1831

Abstract

Background. The execution challenge process in Indonesia faces numerous obstacles, including procedural ambiguity, administrative inefficiencies, and case backlogs. These challenges lead to prolonged case resolution and undermine public trust in the legal system, especially among individuals with limited legal knowledge or financial resources. Purpose. This study aims to identify the main obstacles in the execution challenge process and assess their impact on legal certainty and access to justice. It also seeks to propose solutions to enhance the effectiveness and fairness of the legal system. Method. A qualitative approach was used, involving case studies, interviews with legal practitioners, and a review of legal documents to analyze procedural gaps and their effects on stakeholders. Findings. The study found that procedural complexity and administrative delays are significant obstacles, causing legal uncertainty and harming public trust. Furthermore, limited access to legal aid for disadvantaged individuals exacerbates inequality in the justice system. Conclusion. Simplifying procedures, incorporating technology in court administration, and enhancing public legal education are essential reforms to improve efficiency and accessibility. These measures will promote legal certainty and ensure equal justice for all.
Co-Authors Donny Widianto Faisal Santiago, Faisal Ferdinal, Ocktave Fitri, Selvi Relita Haikal, Ahmad Herdianto, Suhadi Rizki Kalele, Verdy Hengky Lingga Nugraha Meidiawaty, Fusia Riswadi Riswadi, Riswadi Rochmadi Rochmadi Samiyono, Sugeng Siagian, Royan Siringoringo, Naek Mampetua Sudiyanto Sudiyanto