Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.704
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal EL-AFKAR : Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis Refleksi: Jurnal Filsafat dan Pemikiran Islam Manthiq : Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Al-DYAS : Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Mestaka: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat GEMBIRA (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Wissen: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Akhlak: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Filsafat Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mandira Cendikia (JPKM-MC) Al-Imtaz: Jurnal Keilmuan Ushuluddin Manthiq : Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam
Purnamasari, Elvira
Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Energy Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
KEBEBASAN MANUSIA DALAM FILSAFAT EKSISTENSIALISME (STUDI KOMPARASI PEMIKIRAN MUHAMMAD IQBAL DAN JEAN PAUL SARTRE) Elvira Purnamasari
Manthiq : Jurnal Filsafat Agama dan Pemikiran Islam Vol 2, No 2 (2017): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Pascasarjana UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mtq.v2i2.667

Abstract

Talking about  freedom, freedom can have many meanings, depending on which  perspective it sees. If wrong  in looking,  then  the  freedom can  be  legitimacy  to do  something that  is not  good.  For this reason understanding freedom with proper  understanding becomes very important. Freedom in the philosophical view of existentialism is interesting to be examined since  this philosophy examines human beings  in terms  of their subjectivity so that it will provide an understanding of freedom not only philosophically which is theoretical but also in the ethical  realm  that really touches human life in real. The two figures whose thoughts are discussed in this study are representative of two different  schools  of existentialism, atheist  / non-religious existence and theistic  / religious existentialism. So this study will also present not only an understanding of freedom from an existentialist perspective but also  to see  how  a concept is viewed  by two  contradictory beliefs.  Muhammad Iqbal who built his thoughts with a firm belief in God and Jean Paul Sartre who tried to keep  people from being dependent on God with their atheistic  beliefs. The problem in this research, are: 1. How is human’s freedom in the philosophy of existentialism of Muhammad Iqbal and  Jean  Paul Sartre? 2. What are the similarities  and differences of the concept of human’s freedom according to Muhammad Iqbal and Jean Paul Sartre? To answer the  research  problem formulation above  is done  library research (library  research), by using  comparative method. The results of the research are: 1. Existentialism  Muhammad Iqbal is theistic existence of theistic. This characteristic of existentialism is very visible in the  idea  of “khudi” philosophy.  Khudi / self in Iqbal’s view is unique, free and creative. The freedom for him is a means to achieve the existence of the ultimate  self is man as niyabati divine/ representative of God on this earth. The existentialism of Jean Paul Sartre is representative of the atheistic  existentialism style. Because this concept departs from the idea that human’s freedom is absolute, then if there is a God man is not free. God’s power  will deprive human’s freedom. The foundation of Sartre’s concept of existentialism is that existence precedes the essence. Because man  is a self-conscious existence that he is free and responsible for his freedom. 2. The thoughts of these two figures have similarities,  namely  a) Equally look at human’s existence from the point of view subjectivity. So according to them  human’s existence is a free self and responsible for their actions. In other words, freedom is a human’s existence, b) His philosophy contains an ethical value that instills the importance of humanity. That every human being has responsibility is not only for himself but for all humans. The differences are: a) God’s existence in Iqbal’s view requires human’s existence, whereas for Sartre  the  existence of God eliminates the  existence of man  as an individual  who  has  absolute freedom, b) Iqbal’s freedom culminates in an approach to God as the vigerence of God. While Sartre’s freedom is an absolute freedom whose goal is purely freedom itself, the freedom to determine without being attached to anything, c) The freedom of others for Iqbal is a means of achieving true freedom. Meanwhile, Sartre argues that the freedom of others is a threat to his freedom.
Deepfake dan Krisis Kejujuran di Era Artificial Intelligence: Analisis Dilema Moral dalam Perspektif Al-Ghazali Siti Rahayu; Elvira Purnamasari
Akhlak : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Filsafat Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Akhlak : Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Filsafat
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Agama dan Filsafat Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/akhlak.v3i3.2186

Abstract

Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, particularly Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), have given rise to the phenomenon of deepfakes technology capable of authentically manipulating audio-visual reality while producing content that is, in fact, fake. The August 2025 deepfake video involving Finance Minister Sri Mulyani serves as clear evidence of a digital integrity crisis that is eroding public trust in Indonesia. Although technical and regulatory solutions continue to be developed, the moral dimension of this crisis has not been thoroughly examined through the framework of classical Islamic ethics, particularly the thought of Al-Ghazali. This study aims to analyze the moral dilemmas posed by deepfake technology and to examine its relevance to the crisis of truthfulness in the digital age from the perspective of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali’s thought. Using a qualitative method through library research with the primary source being the book Ihya’ Ulum al-Din, this study applies a descriptive-analytical approach to examine the phenomenon of digital manipulation and uncover its ethical dimensions from Al-Ghazali’s perspective. The results indicate that deepfakes constitute a modern form of kadzib that creates a false reality and triggers a crisis of public trust. From Al-Ghazali’s perspective, this phenomenon contradicts the principle of sidq as well as the objectives of maqasid al-shariah. Therefore, the values of sidq, amanah, tabayun, and tazkiyatun nafs serve as an ethical framework in the production, distribution, and consumption of digital information to strengthen technical approaches to maintaining integrity and public trust.
Ketimpangan Moral dalam Praktik Pertambangan di Indonesia: Kritik Antroposentris dan Rekonstruksi Etika Biosentris Satria Pramuja; Elvira Purnamasari
WISSEN : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Mei : WISSEN : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/wissen.v4i2.1724

Abstract

Indonesia is recognized as a country with abundant mineral resources; however, the expansion of the mining sector has generated multidimensional moral inequality, encompassing an imbalance in economic benefit distribution between corporations and local communities, disregard for the intrinsic value of nature, and the marginalization of affected communities from decision-making. The dominance of the anthropocentric paradigm, which places humans as the center of value, is the root cause of this problem. This study aims to analyze moral inequality in Indonesia's mining practices, examine the anthropocentric paradigm in natural resource management, and formulate biocentric ethics as a just alternative. A qualitative approach with library research method was employed, collecting data from national scientific journals, official government reports, and environmental ethics literature, analyzed descriptively-critically through content analysis technique. Findings reveal three interrelated dimensions of moral inequality: inequality in benefit and burden distribution, inequality in recognizing the intrinsic value of nature, and inequality in participatory decision-making. A reconstruction of biocentric ethics grounded in the principles of non-maleficence, noninterference, fidelity, and restitutive justice offers a comprehensive value framework to address ecological moral deficits. This study concludes that a paradigmatic transformation from anthropocentrism to biocentrism, through Free Prior and Informed Consent implementation, the polluter pays principle, and care ethics-based governance, is a fundamental step toward ethical and sustainable mining practices.
Co-Authors Afifah, Syahwalid Agustiana, Pebi Agustini Agustini, Agustini Akbar, Haikal Vidi Al-Fariz, Muhammad Ghani Andrian Fuady Anggraini, Oci Anggraini Anggun Dewiarti Anggun Jelita Putri Anisa Anggraini Aprilianti, Dika Aprin Arie Nulhakim Ayu Lestari Cici Natalia Dello Pransiska Dian Wahyu Lia Eka Meilinda Enjelika Marda Lensi Erti Agustina Ewi Egus Maresta Hutomo, Arif Jannah, Meftahul khusnul khotimah M. Jamil Meysi Dwi Saputri Muhammad Ali Sumantri Muhammad Faqih Al Farisi Muqovi Zainatud Dini Nadia Ajeng Pratiwi Okta Riski Tata Negara Oktaria, Selva Patriawati, Salma Junia Purna Sari, Efta Liza Putri, Allya Dwi Putri, Liza Sintia Putri, Melinda Dita Putri, Tesssa Amelia Qurnia, Indah Rega Agustina Rheinavia Putri Utami Rian Fajar Saputra Riyani Khoerunisya Sa'adah Mardliyati Saputra, Jeni Harlen Saputra, Sahlan Rangga satria pramuja Sintia Junita Siti Marhamah, Siti Siti Rahayu Suci Nanda Ramadhan Syahida, Amani Tara Zevani Wahyuni, Shoviana Wati, Devi Setia Windia Erliani Yunia Eli Zahela Zagirin, A. Riska Emilia Zikri, M.