Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : HORIZON PUBLIC LEGAL STUDIES

Implementation of Suspects' Rights as an Embodiment of the Presumption of Innocence Principle in the Examination Process at the Investigation Level Surdan, Sumianti; Assaad, Andi Istiqlal; Putera, Airlangga
HORIZON PUBLIC LEGAL STUDIES Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Vol 1 No 1 (2024): Horizon Public Legal Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/hegels.v1i1.492

Abstract

This study aims to find out and analyze the implementation of the rights of suspects as a manifestation of the principle of presumption of innocence in the examination process at the investigation level and to find out the factors that hinder the investigator in the implementation and analyze the rights of suspects as a manifestation of the principle of presumption of innocence at the examination process at the investigation level. This study used the Empirical Law research method, with interviews with related samples/respondents. The source of this research data is to the investigators of the Makassar City Police and some of the rights of suspects as a manifestation of the principle of presumption of innocence in the examination process at the level of investigation of victims of abuse. The results of this study The factors that caused the suspect not to get his rights in the investigation process were the lack of communication between the investigator and the suspect regarding the rights of the suspect contained in the Criminal Procedure Code, in the investigation process the suspect refused to get legal assistance because he was afraid and unable to pay legal counsel even though it was known that there was a right to get legal assistance free of charge. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan Untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis implementasi hak-hak tersangka sebagai perwujudan asas praduga tak bersalah dalam proses pemeriksaan ditingkat penyidikan dan Untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menjadi hambatan penyidik dalam implementasi dan menganalisis hak-hak tersangka sebagai perwujudan asas praduga tak bersalah pada proses pemeriksaan ditingkat penyidikan.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian Hukum Empiris, dengan wawancara terhadap sampel/responden terkait. Adapun sumber data penelitian ini adalah kepada pihak penyidik Polrestabes Kota Makassar serta beberapa hak-hak tersangka seabagai perwujudan asas praduga tak bersalah dalam proses pemeriksaan ditingkat penyidikan korban penganiayaan. Hasil penelitian ini Faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan sehingga tersangka tidak mendapatkan haknya dalam proses penyidikan kurangnya komunikasi pihak penyidik dengan tersangka mengenai hak-hak tersangka yang terdapat di dalam KUHAP, pada proses penyidikan tersangka menolak untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum karena takut dan tidak mampu untuk membayar penasehat hukum padahal diketahui bahwa ada hak mendapatkan bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma.
Function Intelligence The District Attorney's Office in Revealing Action Criminal Corruption Qalbi, Nurul; Qamar, Nurul; Assaad, Andi Istiqlal
HORIZON PUBLIC LEGAL STUDIES Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Vol 1 No 2 (2025): Horizon Public Legal Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/hegels.v1i2.978

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role and function of the Pinrang District Prosecutor's Intelligence in disclosing criminal acts of corruption and identifying the obstacles faced in this process. The approach used is an empirical approach with data collection methods through interviews and literature study. Interviews were conducted with the Head of the Intelligence Section, members of the Intel Prosecutor, as well as practicing legal advocates who have in-depth knowledge and understanding regarding the disclosure of criminal acts of corruption and the legal processes that apply in Indonesia. The literature study was carried out by studying relevant laws and regulations as well as other scientific works that discuss the role of the District Attorney's intelligence in disclosing criminal acts of corruption. The research results show that the disclosure process begins with public reports or internal findings received and continues with data collection and exposure involving the Head of the District Attorney's Office, Head of the Intelligence Section, and Head of the Special Crimes Section to determine the feasibility of the investigation. Obstacles faced include limited budget, facilities, and external pressure from certain parties. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the budget and supporting facilities as well as protection for investigators so that the law enforcement process runs optimally. To increase the effectiveness of disclosing corruption cases, it is recommended that there be an additional budget, facilitation of a team of experts, better coordination between institutions, as well as increased transparency and education for the public. The prosecutor's office is also expected to increase the training and capacity of officers to overcome challenges in disclosing criminal acts of corruption in accordance with applicable legal procedures.