Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Hukum Islam HORIZON PUBLIC LEGAL STUDIES COMPENDIUM OF JUDGE MADE LAW
Assaad, Andi Istiqlal
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
HAKIKAT SANKSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM Assaad, Andi Istiqlal
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 20 No 2: November 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (213.714 KB) | DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v20i2.11

Abstract

Essentially criminal law sanctions in Indonesia and the Islamic criminal law can be compared by reviewing the nature of criminal law sanctions in Indonesia is to maintain / preserve the benefit of the individual. While the nature of the sanctions within the Islamic criminal law, is to keep / maintain the benefit of individuals and society. Abstrak Intinya sanksi hukum pidana di Indonesia dan hukum pidana Islam dapat dibandingkan dengan mengkaji sifat sanksi hukum pidana di Indonesia adalah dengan mempertahankan / melestarikan manfaat individu. Sedangkan sifat dari sanksi dalam hukum pidana Islam, adalah untuk menjaga / mempertahankan manfaat individu dan masyarakat.
Integration of Maqaṣid al-Shari'ah in the Criminal Law Reform to Achieve Justice and Human Dignity brahim, Zumiyati Sanu; Karimullah, Suud Sarim; Assaad, Andi Istiqlal; Septiani, Rina; Okur, Huseyin
Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 23 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/jhi.v23i1.04

Abstract

In this postmodern era, when the boundaries between local and global are increasingly blurred, efforts to build a contextual, ethical, and responsive criminal justice system have become an urgent necessity. This study aims to propose a model of criminal law reform based on maqaṣid al-shari'ah that is more humane and just, emphasizing not only the imposition of sanctions or punishments but also the rehabilitation and restoration of offenders. This study is normative-juridical, employing a doctrinal analysis approach and reinforced by various relevant legal theories to provide a philosophical foundation for evaluating the application of maqaṣid al-shari'ah in contemporary criminal law needs. The results state that the integration of maqaṣid al-shari'ah in criminal law reform in Muslim-majority countries, including Indonesia, should not be viewed merely as a symbolic moderation between religious law and human rights, but as a transformative project that requires epistemological courage to overhaul the classical view of legal authority and the meaning of justice. Amidst the wave of globalization that challenges the supremacy of religious law and demands stronger protection of human dignity, maqaṣid is present not merely as passive theological values, but as active principles that require that law protect life, reason, freedom, and social welfare in concrete and measurable ways. The path toward integrating maqasid-based criminal law principles into the modern criminal legal systems of majority-Muslim countries is not a short-term project, as it requires a paradigm shift from a textualist approach to a contextual approach, from legalism to humanism, and from conservatism to intellectual courage.
Implementation of Suspects' Rights as an Embodiment of the Presumption of Innocence Principle in the Examination Process at the Investigation Level Surdan, Sumianti; Assaad, Andi Istiqlal; Putera, Airlangga
HORIZON PUBLIC LEGAL STUDIES Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Vol 1 No 1 (2024): Horizon Public Legal Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/hegels.v1i1.492

Abstract

This study aims to find out and analyze the implementation of the rights of suspects as a manifestation of the principle of presumption of innocence in the examination process at the investigation level and to find out the factors that hinder the investigator in the implementation and analyze the rights of suspects as a manifestation of the principle of presumption of innocence at the examination process at the investigation level. This study used the Empirical Law research method, with interviews with related samples/respondents. The source of this research data is to the investigators of the Makassar City Police and some of the rights of suspects as a manifestation of the principle of presumption of innocence in the examination process at the level of investigation of victims of abuse. The results of this study The factors that caused the suspect not to get his rights in the investigation process were the lack of communication between the investigator and the suspect regarding the rights of the suspect contained in the Criminal Procedure Code, in the investigation process the suspect refused to get legal assistance because he was afraid and unable to pay legal counsel even though it was known that there was a right to get legal assistance free of charge. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan Untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis implementasi hak-hak tersangka sebagai perwujudan asas praduga tak bersalah dalam proses pemeriksaan ditingkat penyidikan dan Untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menjadi hambatan penyidik dalam implementasi dan menganalisis hak-hak tersangka sebagai perwujudan asas praduga tak bersalah pada proses pemeriksaan ditingkat penyidikan.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian Hukum Empiris, dengan wawancara terhadap sampel/responden terkait. Adapun sumber data penelitian ini adalah kepada pihak penyidik Polrestabes Kota Makassar serta beberapa hak-hak tersangka seabagai perwujudan asas praduga tak bersalah dalam proses pemeriksaan ditingkat penyidikan korban penganiayaan. Hasil penelitian ini Faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan sehingga tersangka tidak mendapatkan haknya dalam proses penyidikan kurangnya komunikasi pihak penyidik dengan tersangka mengenai hak-hak tersangka yang terdapat di dalam KUHAP, pada proses penyidikan tersangka menolak untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum karena takut dan tidak mampu untuk membayar penasehat hukum padahal diketahui bahwa ada hak mendapatkan bantuan hukum secara cuma-cuma.
Function Intelligence The District Attorney's Office in Revealing Action Criminal Corruption Qalbi, Nurul; Qamar, Nurul; Assaad, Andi Istiqlal
HORIZON PUBLIC LEGAL STUDIES Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Vol 1 No 2 (2025): Horizon Public Legal Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/hegels.v1i2.978

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role and function of the Pinrang District Prosecutor's Intelligence in disclosing criminal acts of corruption and identifying the obstacles faced in this process. The approach used is an empirical approach with data collection methods through interviews and literature study. Interviews were conducted with the Head of the Intelligence Section, members of the Intel Prosecutor, as well as practicing legal advocates who have in-depth knowledge and understanding regarding the disclosure of criminal acts of corruption and the legal processes that apply in Indonesia. The literature study was carried out by studying relevant laws and regulations as well as other scientific works that discuss the role of the District Attorney's intelligence in disclosing criminal acts of corruption. The research results show that the disclosure process begins with public reports or internal findings received and continues with data collection and exposure involving the Head of the District Attorney's Office, Head of the Intelligence Section, and Head of the Special Crimes Section to determine the feasibility of the investigation. Obstacles faced include limited budget, facilities, and external pressure from certain parties. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the budget and supporting facilities as well as protection for investigators so that the law enforcement process runs optimally. To increase the effectiveness of disclosing corruption cases, it is recommended that there be an additional budget, facilitation of a team of experts, better coordination between institutions, as well as increased transparency and education for the public. The prosecutor's office is also expected to increase the training and capacity of officers to overcome challenges in disclosing criminal acts of corruption in accordance with applicable legal procedures.
Application Of Primum Remedium Principle in Corruption Criminal Acts In Decision (Number 46/Pid.Sus.TPK/2024/PN Mks) Wirayudha, Budhi; Marsuni, Lauddin; Assaad, Andi Istiqlal
COMPENDIUM OF JUDGE MADE LAW Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Compendium of Judge Made Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/2y3b6s15

Abstract

This study aims to find out two things, namely the first to find out the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges in applying the primum remedium principle in decision Number 46 / Pid.Sus.TPK / 2024 / PN Mks and the second to find out the application of the Primum Remedium Principle in Corruption Crimes in Decision Case Number 46 / Pid.Sus.TPK / 2024 / PN Mks has met the legal objectives. The method in this study is to use normative legal research, the type of research is carried out by studying the laws and regulations in society related to the problems that the author is studying. The results of the study revealed that the legal considerations by the Panel of Judges in decision number 46 / Pid.SUS.TPK / 2024 / PN.Mks, have applied the primum remedium principle by imposing imprisonment and additional compensation in the form of compensation commensurate with state losses. Although this case meets the requirements for applying a restorative justice approach because the value of state losses is relatively small. Apart from this controversy, the Judge's considerations in the decision are in accordance with applicable legal regulations. ²The application of the primum remedium principle in Decision Number 46/Pid.Sus.TPK/2024/PN Mks has attempted to fulfill the three objectives of the law, namely the aspect of justice, the aspect of legal certainty, and the aspect of benefit. However, in the decision, the Panel of Judges prioritized legal certainty over justice and benefit. This can be seen from the decision to impose a 1-year prison sentence and a replacement fee of IDR 50,000,000, which shows the firmness in the application of the sentence. However, in terms of justice and benefit, there is still room for improvement, especially related to the impact of prevention and deterrent effects on future corruption crimes. The recommendation or suggestion given by the author is that the prosecutor's office in this decision needs to review the application of the SE Attorney General for Special Crimes Number B1113/F/Fd.1/05/2010 for corruption cases with small state losses, by considering the efficiency of case handling costs and the effectiveness of recovering state losses. For the Panel of Judges in handing down a verdict on corruption crimes, it is best to consider the balance between the three aspects of legal objectives (justice, legal certainty, and benefit) to achieve maximum deterrent effect.
Co-Authors brahim, Zumiyati Sanu Karimullah, Suud Sarim Marsuni, Lauddin Nurul Qalbi, Nurul Nurul Qamar Okur, Hüseyin Putera, Airlangga Rina Septiani, Rina Surdan, Sumianti Wirayudha, Budhi