Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.844
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal EduChemia: Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA dan Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research) Discovery : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Ed-Humanistics : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Education JUKESHUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat KARANGAN Journal Online Learning in Educational Research Nukleo Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA UNESA Journal of Chemical Education Jurnal Matematika dan Sains (JMS) Taawun: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
Priyasmika, Rendy
Universitas Billfath
Religion Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Ed-Humanistics : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan

 1 
PERBANDINGAN STRATEGI INKUIRI TERBIMBING DENGAN PROBLEM SOLVING TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEPTUAL DAN ALGORITMA SISWA DENGAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR ILMIAH RENDAH Priyasmika, Rendy
Ed-Humanistics : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Ed-Humanistics
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan (FIP) Universitas Hasyim Asy'ari (Unhasy) Tebuireng Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1749.267 KB) | DOI: 10.33752/ed-humanistics.v4i1.355

Abstract

AbstractOne of the high school chemistry materials that contains concrete concepts, abstracts andinvolves mathematical calculations is solubility and solubility product (Ksp). Conceptualunderstanding is usually expressed in short sentences while understanding algorithms isexpressed by mathematical equations. Both of these understandings are closely related to oneanother so that to teach them requires the right learning strategies. Guided inquiry learningstrategies and Problem Solving are thought to be able to improve the conceptual understandingand algorithm understanding of students with Low Scientific Thinking Ability. This study aimsto determine differences in conceptual understanding with algorithm understanding of studentswith KBIR that are taught with guided inquiry strategies and Problem Solving. This study usesa quasi-experimental design with posttest only control group design. Data from the conceptualunderstanding and algorithm test results obtained from the test using 20 multiple choicequestions with a reliability coefficient of 0.71 and content validity of 93.17%. Data analysisusing t test and Product Moment correlation at a significance level of 5%. The results show thatThe learning outcomes of student with low scientific thinking ability that learned by guidedinquiry’s strategy is higher than the students that learned by problem solving’s strategy and Theunderstanding of algorithms of students with low scientific thinking ability is higher thanconceptual understanding both of which that learned by guided inquiry strategies and problemsolving strategies.Keywords: guided inquiry, problem solving, conceptual understanding, algorithmunderstanding, scientific thinking ability
Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa pada Materi Asam Basa Menggunakan Four Tier Diagnostic Test (FTDT) Priyasmika, Rendy; Ilmah, Mashfufatul
Ed-Humanistics : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Ed-Humanistics
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan (FIP) Universitas Hasyim Asy'ari (Unhasy) Tebuireng Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33752/ed-humanistics.v10i1.8986

Abstract

Acid-base is one of the important chemistry materials and is a prerequisite knowledge for understanding subsequent chemistry materials. This material contains concrete, abstract concepts, and mathematical calculations so that it is considered difficult and has the potential to cause misconceptions. Therefore, a good and complete understanding of this concept is very important to avoid misconceptions that can hinder the learning process. The purpose of this study was to determine the types of misconceptions experienced by students in acid-base material. This study used a descriptive design with a quantitative approach. The subjects of the study were first-year students of Billfath University who took basic chemistry courses. The sampling technique used was saturated sampling. The data collection instrument developed and used was the four tiers diagnostic test (FTDT). The data analysis technique used was guided by the percentage of misconceptions in the sub-concepts and questions on acid-base material. The results showed that students experienced acid-base misconceptions in the moderate category with an average percentage of 31%. The highest misconceptions were identified in the sub-concept of the relationship between pH and water quality with a percentage of misconceptions of 45%. The lowest misconceptions were identified in the subconcepts of the Arrhenius and Bronstead-Lowry acid-base theories with a misconception percentage of 23%.
PERBANDINGAN STRATEGI INKUIRI TERBIMBING DENGAN PROBLEM SOLVING TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEPTUAL DAN ALGORITMA SISWA DENGAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR ILMIAH RENDAH Priyasmika, Rendy
Ed-Humanistics : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Ed-Humanistics
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan (FIP) Universitas Hasyim Asy'ari (Unhasy) Tebuireng Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33752/ed-humanistics.v4i1.355

Abstract

AbstractOne of the high school chemistry materials that contains concrete concepts, abstracts andinvolves mathematical calculations is solubility and solubility product (Ksp). Conceptualunderstanding is usually expressed in short sentences while understanding algorithms isexpressed by mathematical equations. Both of these understandings are closely related to oneanother so that to teach them requires the right learning strategies. Guided inquiry learningstrategies and Problem Solving are thought to be able to improve the conceptual understandingand algorithm understanding of students with Low Scientific Thinking Ability. This study aimsto determine differences in conceptual understanding with algorithm understanding of studentswith KBIR that are taught with guided inquiry strategies and Problem Solving. This study usesa quasi-experimental design with posttest only control group design. Data from the conceptualunderstanding and algorithm test results obtained from the test using 20 multiple choicequestions with a reliability coefficient of 0.71 and content validity of 93.17%. Data analysisusing t test and Product Moment correlation at a significance level of 5%. The results show thatThe learning outcomes of student with low scientific thinking ability that learned by guidedinquiry’s strategy is higher than the students that learned by problem solving’s strategy and Theunderstanding of algorithms of students with low scientific thinking ability is higher thanconceptual understanding both of which that learned by guided inquiry strategies and problemsolving strategies.Keywords: guided inquiry, problem solving, conceptual understanding, algorithmunderstanding, scientific thinking ability
Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa pada Materi Asam Basa Menggunakan Four Tier Diagnostic Test (FTDT) Priyasmika, Rendy; Ilmah, Mashfufatul
Ed-Humanistics : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Ed-Humanistics
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan (FIP) Universitas Hasyim Asy'ari (Unhasy) Tebuireng Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33752/ed-humanistics.v10i1.8986

Abstract

Acid-base is one of the important chemistry materials and is a prerequisite knowledge for understanding subsequent chemistry materials. This material contains concrete, abstract concepts, and mathematical calculations so that it is considered difficult and has the potential to cause misconceptions. Therefore, a good and complete understanding of this concept is very important to avoid misconceptions that can hinder the learning process. The purpose of this study was to determine the types of misconceptions experienced by students in acid-base material. This study used a descriptive design with a quantitative approach. The subjects of the study were first-year students of Billfath University who took basic chemistry courses. The sampling technique used was saturated sampling. The data collection instrument developed and used was the four tiers diagnostic test (FTDT). The data analysis technique used was guided by the percentage of misconceptions in the sub-concepts and questions on acid-base material. The results showed that students experienced acid-base misconceptions in the moderate category with an average percentage of 31%. The highest misconceptions were identified in the sub-concept of the relationship between pH and water quality with a percentage of misconceptions of 45%. The lowest misconceptions were identified in the subconcepts of the Arrhenius and Bronstead-Lowry acid-base theories with a misconception percentage of 23%.
Co-Authors Abd Basith, Abd Abdul Basith Abdul Basith Ah. Fathul Jadid Anshori Ahmad Fathul Jadid Anshori Alfan, Aris Ardimas, Ardimas Aris Alfan Fatayah Fatayah Fatayah, Fatayah Ika Farida Yuliana Ilmah, Mashfufatul JHELANG ANNOVASHO Nikmatin Sholichah Norma Sidik Risdianto Purwanto, Kriesna Kharisma Rohmah, Rosyidah Syafaatur Rosyidah Syafaatur Rohmah Rosyidah Syafaatur Rohmah Sa'diyah, Halimatus Sholikhah, Lifa Nur Aminatus Tsalitsatul Maulidah