Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.133
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Dusturiah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Kalam: Jurnal Agama dan Sosial Humaniora Jurnal Yudisial SYARIAH: Journal of Islamic Law MAQASIDI Jurnal Al-Fikrah Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Syariah dan Peradilan Islam AR-RA'YU : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Fatahillah, Zahrul
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syari'ah (STIS) Nahdlatul Ulama Aceh
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PENGESAMPINGAN SYARAT ALTERNATIF POLIGAMI SEBAGAI DASAR MENGABULKAN PERMOHONAN Mansari, Mansari; Fatahillah, Zahrul; Sahara, Siti
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 16 No. 3 (2023): DISPARITAS PUTUSAN
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v16i3.659

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hakim yang mengesampingkan Pasal 4 ayat (2) UndangUndang Perkawinan, sehingga mengabulkan permohonan izin poligami. Ketentuan yang dikesampingkan tersebut menyatakan pengadilan memberi izin berpoligami jika istri tidak melaksanakan kewajibannya, memiliki penyakit badan atau sulit disembuhkan dan tidak dapat melahirkan keturunan. Kenyataan empiris menunjukkan tidak terpenuhinya ketiga alasan tersebut pada kasus dalam Putusan Nomor 272/Pdt.G/2023/MS.Bna, namun permohonan izin poligami dikabulkan oleh majelis hakim. Permasalahan lainnya pemohon telah menikah secara siri dengan istri kedua, padahal masih terikat dengan istri pertamanya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara yuridis pertimbangan majelis hakim mengabulkan permohonan izin poligami dengan mengesampingkan syarat alternatif dan status hukum bagi perkawinan siri pasca dikabulkannya izin poligami. Penelitian hukum yang digunakan yaitu metode penelitian hukum normatif. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara menelaah data yang terdapat di perpustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara yuridis dikabulkannya permohonan izin poligami kurang tepat dalam perspektif yuridis, namun dari sisi keadilan dan kemanfaatan dapat dirasakan oleh para pihak. Status perkawinan siri dengan istri pertama menurut hukum agama sah, namun harus dicatatkan dan dinikahkan kembali di hadapan pejabat pencatat perkawinan. Mempelai laki-laki dan perempuan harus melakukan nikah ulang dengan melampirkan penetapan izin poligami sebagai syarat bagi suami yang berpoligami.
NIKAH MISYAR DALAM PERSPEKTIF MAQASHID SYARIAH: STUDI YURIDIS TERHADAP FENOMENA KEKINIAN DI BANDA ACEH Ali Furqan, Ali Furqan; Zahrul Fatahillah; Uswatun Hasanah
AR-RA'YU : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): AR-RA'YU : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syari'ah (STIS) Nahdlatul Ulama Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55721/de3znr57

Abstract

Marriage in Islam is a sacred institution that serves to uphold moral values and social stability, but the emergence of misyar marriage has sparked controversy because the wife relinquishes some of her rights. This phenomenon began in Banda Aceh and has raised legal and social issues. This study examines the views of contemporary scholars on misyar marriage within the framework of maqashid syariah. The primary focus is on the compatibility of this practice with the principle of protecting the rights of women and children. Additionally, the study discusses how Indonesian family law responds to this phenomenon. The research employs a normative approach, using it to thoroughly examine Islamic texts such as the Quran, hadith, and fiqh books that discuss marriage, particularly the form of misyar marriage, and to analyze them using the applicable legal norms. The results of the study show that although misyar marriage is considered valid in fiqh by some scholars, this practice remains controversial because it has the potential to weaken the protection of women and children. The approach that emphasizes formal validity often ignores moral responsibility in fostering a harmonious family. In the context of maqashid syariah, misyar marriage is considered to not fulfill the objectives of preserving offspring and justice. In Banda Aceh, this practice contradicts the values of customary law and protection norms in national law. When women relinquish their rights, the risks of inequality and social harm increase. Therefore, a more contextual and integrative approach to Islamic family law is needed. This approach must combine the values of maqashid, the principle of justice, and legal protection to ensure that marriage remains meaningful both spiritually and socially. The relevance of Islamic law must be maintained to ensure it continues to provide tangible benefits for communities that uphold justice and the common good.
IMPLEMENTASI HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM DI ACEH BESAR DALAM MERESPON PERUBAHAN SOSIAL Sayed Ilyas, Sayed Ilyas; Zahrul Fatahillah; Muhammad Zulfan
AR-RA'YU : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): AR-RA'YU : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syari'ah (STIS) Nahdlatul Ulama Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55721/m5gabt81

Abstract

Islamic family law plays an important role in shaping the social structure of Muslims and has undergone formalization in Indonesia's national legal system. However, its implementation in the field faces various obstacles, such as nikah siri, unauthorized polygamy and illegal divorce. This phenomenon indicates a gap between legal norms and social reality. This study aims to examine the factors inhibiting the implementation of Islamic family law in Aceh Besar and its response to social dynamics. This study is expected to provide solutions to the problems of Islamic family law in the context of Indonesian legal pluralism. The research method used in this study is empirical juridical legal research, which is research that not only examines the law as a written norm (das sollen), but also analyzes how the law applies and is implemented in social reality (das sein). The results showed multidimensional obstacles, ranging from low legal literacy, patriarchal culture, to disharmonization between qanun and national law. Limited access to the judiciary and a lack of legal aid also exacerbate inequalities in justice. In addition, weak institutional coordination and lack of evaluation lead to policy stagnation. Responses to social change, including digitalization and gender awareness, have not been fully accommodated. A transformative and participatory approach is needed in strengthening family law. This research recommends systemic reforms that include legal education, harmonization of rules, and increased access to justice based on equality and maqāṣid sharia.
Normative Disharmony Regarding the Duration of Marital Conflict in Divorce Law and Its Impact on the Protection of Women Zahrul Fatahillah; Muhajir, Muhammad; Hasanah, Uswatun
MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 5, No. 2 (Desember 2025)
Publisher : MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum published by the Islamic Criminal Law Program of the Sharia and Islamic Economics Department at the Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Teungku Dirundeng Meulaboh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47498/maqasidi.v5i2.5878

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the normative disharmony regarding the time limit of disputes and quarrels as grounds for divorce within the Indonesian legal system, specifically between Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 1 of 2022. The inconsistency among these three regulations gives rise to practical issues in judicial proceedings, particularly in ensuring effective legal protection for women. Both the Government Regulation and the KHI do not stipulate a minimum duration of conflict as a requirement for divorce, whereas the SEMA explicitly requires that the dispute must have lasted for at least six months. This provision potentially obstructs women’s access to justice, especially in cases involving unhealthy or violent domestic circumstances. Employing a normative legal research method through statutory and conceptual approaches, this study finds that the time limit regulation in the SEMA is not aligned with the provisions set forth in the Government Regulation and the KHI. The norms within the SEMA are deemed insufficiently responsive to the legal needs of women, thereby necessitating regulatory harmonization to establish a just, adaptive legal system that guarantees equal protection in divorce cases. SEMA Number 1 of 2022 sets a six-month dispute requirement for divorce. This norm restricts judicial discretion and impedes legal protection for women, particularly victims of domestic violence. From a juridical perspective, the SEMA also exceeds its authority by regulating substantive matters without formal legislative processes. Consequently, substantive justice and human rights are at risk of being neglected. An urgent evaluation of this provision is necessary to ensure fair and responsive protection.
Co-Authors Ahmad Fikri Oslami Ali Furqan, Ali Furqan Faizah Faizah Mansari, Mansari Muhammad Muhajir, Muhammad Muhammad Zulfan Muslim Zainuddin Muzakir Oslami, Ahmad Fikri Rizkal Rizkal Sayed Ilyas, Sayed Ilyas Siti Sahara Uswatun Hasanah USWATUN HASANAH