Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Implications of Understanding Contextual Hadith on Religious Radicalism (Case Study of Darus-Sunnah International Institute for Hadith Sciences) Thohari, Fuad; Muslim, Moch. Bukhori; Zada, Khamami; Misbahuddin, Misbahuddin
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.11124

Abstract

In hadith studies, many conclusions state that textual reasoning towards hadith is the main cause of intolerance and radicalism. This makes some scholars such as Yusuf al-Qardhawi and Ali Mustafa Yakub offer a more complex understanding of hadith involving asbab wurud al-hadith, al-wahdah al-maudhu'iyyah fi al-hadith, ikhtilaf al-ahadith and so on. Hadith reasoning like this is considered by some as a contextualization of hadith that will prevent someone from religious radicalism. This study wants to answer the question, to what extent does contextual reasoning in hadith prevent a person from religious radicalism? Researchers will examine the formulation of contextual hadith reasoning initiated by Ali Mustafa Yaqub in al-Thuruq al-Shahihah fi Fahm al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah and standards of religious radicalism initiated by LIPI in the Strategy for Anticipating Radicalism and Religious Intolerance in Indonesia. Each will be used as an independent variable and dependent variable. This research is mixed research with the type of field research. The data processing technique used is a simple regression test using the SPSS 20 program. The research object of this study is the Mahasantri Darus-Sunnah International Institute for Hadith Sciences with a total of 32 people. While the sampling system in this study is a random sample. The results of this study indicate that contextual hadith reasoning has a sig. 0.008 which is less than 0.05 so it is said to have a significant effect between contextual hadith reasoning on religious radicalism. The magnitude of the influence of this hadith reasoning itself is 21.2%. The direction of the effect is negative with a magnitude of -.643 at a constant of 69.792. This means that there is a negative relationship between contextual hadith reasoning and religious radicalism. The more contextual a person's understanding of hadith is, the further away he is from radicalism.
Tadrīj Method in Hajj Fund Management by Badan Pengelola Keuangan Haji (BPKH) in Indonesia: A Study of Islamic Economic Law Muslim, Moch. Bukhori; Khan, M. Dawud Arif; Saepullah, Saepullah; Hendarsa, Agung Sri; Afif, Ahmad
El-Qist: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business (JIEB) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): April (on-going)
Publisher : Islamic Economics Department, Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University, Surabaya Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/elqist.2026.16.1.139-161

Abstract

Background: The governance of Hajj funds in Indonesia, administered by the Badan Pengelola Keuangan Haji (BPKH), represents a complex intersection between Islamic legal norms and modern financial management. Although formally regulated under Law No. 34/2014 and reinforced by Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) Fatwa No. 09/Ijtima' Ulama/VIII/2024, practical challenges remain in ensuring that investment decisions and governance mechanisms consistently reflect Sharia principles. This tension highlights the need for an adaptive approach that reconciles normative compliance with institutional and market realities. Objective: This study aims to examine how the Tadrīj approach can be operationalized in Hajj fund management as a strategic framework to strengthen Sharia compliance while maintaining financial performance and institutional stability. Method: The research employs a qualitative descriptive design, using institutional data from BPKH financial management reports and relevant regulatory documents. Data are analyzed through a normative-empirical approach, integrating legal interpretation with contextual evaluation of governance practices. Findings: The study finds that the application of Tadrīj enables a phased and adaptive integration of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah into Hajj fund governance. This gradual approach reduces potential conflicts between strict legal compliance and investment efficiency, while reinforcing transparency and accountability as core institutional pillars. In addition, continuous engagement with Sharia scholars and periodic policy evaluation are essential in ensuring that governance practices remain aligned with Islamic legal and ethical standards. Conclusion: Implementing a Tadrīj-based framework enables BPKH to navigate the dynamic demands of modern financial management without compromising Sharia principles. This approach not only safeguards pilgrims' interests but also strengthens public trust in the institution. Implication: This study contributes to the development of Islamic economic governance by positioning Tadrīj as a practical and scalable model for institutional reform in Sharia-based public fund management. Practically, it offers policy-relevant insights for regulators and Islamic financial institutions seeking to balance legal compliance, financial sustainability, and stakeholder trust in complex economic environments.