Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Exploring the Use of AI-Enhanced Listening Comprehension Tools by EFL Students in the English Department at Universitas Bhinneka PGRI Huda, Moh. Choirul; Nia Roistika; Caterina Nova Triani
Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): December
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36085/telle.v5i3.9602

Abstract

The rapid growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has introduced new opportunities for improving English listening comprehension, a skill many EFL learners continue to find challenging. This study explores the use of AI-enhanced listening tools among students in the English Department at Universitas Bhinneka PGRI. The research aims to identify the AI tools commonly used by students, examine their perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, and engagement, and investigate the difficulties they encounter when using these tools. A qualitative descriptive exploratory design was employed, combining a questionnaire distributed to 43 students with semi-structured interviews conducted with 10 participants. Data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman framework, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that YouTube Auto-Caption is the most widely used AI tool, followed by ELSA Speak and Duolingo, mainly due to their accessibility and familiar interfaces. Students reported positive perceptions of AI-enhanced listening tools, noting that features such as automatic captions, speed control, replay functions, and pronunciation feedback helped them better understand spoken English and increased their motivation to practice listening. Despite these advantages, several challenges emerged, including inaccurate captions, unstable internet connections, limited free features, and insufficient guidance on how to use the tools effectively.Overall, the study concludes that AI-enhanced tools have strong potential to support EFL learners’ listening development, but their effectiveness depends on both technological quality and pedagogical support. The findings highlight the need for teachers to provide structured guidance and for developers to improve usability and accessibility. Future research may examine the long-term impact of AI tools or compare the effectiveness of different platforms in various learning contexts.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Antar Lembaga Negara Non Eksekutif yang Kewenangannya diberikan oleh Undang-Undang: Resolution of Authority Disputes Between Non-Executive State Institutions whose Authority is Granted by Law Huda, Moh. Choirul; Firdaus, Fahmi Ramadhan
Constitution Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Constitution Journal December 2025
Publisher : UIN Kiai Haji Ahmad Sidiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/constitution.v4i2.143

Abstract

Resolution of disputes over state institutions' authority is part of the Constitutional Court's authority based on Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. However, this provision raises problems due to the lack of a juridical space to resolve disputes over authority between institutions whose authority is not derived from the 1945 Constitution. Through a study using normative juridical methods, it was found that disputes over authority between institutions arise due to the lack of a clear blueprint for institutional arrangement, as well as political and institutional interests. On the other hand, the problem of resolving disputes over non-constitutional state institutions can be addressed by improving the Constitutional Court's interpretation in the practice of adjudicating state institution disputes, granting authority by the Supreme Court, or through judicial review of laws Abstrak Penyelesaian sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara merupakan bagian dari kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dengan dasar ketentuan Pasal 24C ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945. Namun, dalam realitasnya ketentuan tersebut menimbulkan problem karena tidak adanya ruang yuridis untuk menyelesaikan sengketa kewenangan antar lembaga yang kewenangannya tidak bersumber dari UUD 1945. Melalui kajian dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, ditemukan bahwa sengketa kewenangan antar lembaga muncul akibat tidak adanya blueprint yang jelas atas  penataan kelembagaan, serta faktor kepentingan politik, serta institusional. Di sisi lain problem penyelesaian sengketa lembaga negara non-konstitusional dapat diatasi dengan memperbaiki tafsir MK dalam praktik peradilan sengketa lembaga negara, pemberian kewenangan oleh Mahkamah Agung, atau melalui sarana pengujian undang-undang (judicial review).