Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.881
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Proceedings of Annual International Conference Syiah Kuala University - Social Sciences Chapter J-EBIS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam) Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab Jurnal Investasi Islam Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis (Ekobis-DA) Student Research Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Khairatun Hisan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
METODOLOGI PERBANDINGAN MADZHAB DALAM AL-MUGHNI KARYA IBNU QUDAMAH: PENDEKATAN DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM STUDI HUKUM ISLAM Khairatun Hisan; Dzulkifli Hadi Imawan; Haqqiya, Hannafa
Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab VOLUME 7 ISSUE 1, JUNE 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.54759

Abstract

This study investigates the methodology of muqāranah al-mażāhib (comparative of madhhabs) as applied by Ibn Qudāmah in his seminal work, Kitāb al-Mugnī, a key reference in the landscape of Islamic jurisprudence in Indonesia. The primary purpose is to critically analyze Ibn Qudāmah’s comparative legal approach and assess its relevance for contemporary ijtihad. Employing a qualitative method, the research utilizes content analysis and textual hermeneutics to examine selected chapters of al-Mugnī—specifically those related to acts of worship and mu‘āmalah (social transactions). The findings reveal that Ibn Qudāmah's method systematically compares the legal views of the four major Sunni madhhabs and includes perspectives from other jurists, presenting them with detailed argumentation and rational justification. His use of tarjīḥ (preference) reflects a critical evaluative process that selects the most compelling legal opinion based on textual evidence and reasoning. The originality of this study lies in its focused analysis of Ibn Qudāmah's structured comparative technique, which balances scholarly objectivity with methodological rigor. The implications of this research are significant for contemporary Islamic legal scholarship, particularly in advancing the practice of collective ijtihad, refining fatwa formulation processes, and fostering a tolerant yet disciplined engagement with legal diversity. Furthermore, the integration of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah into this comparative framework enriches its applicability in addressing modern socio-legal issues.
Strategi Negosiasi Efektif di Era Digital melalui Platform Digital Dinda Rizqia Maulana; Annabilla Zahra; Khairatun Hisan; Lilik Sumarni
Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Agustus : KONSENSUS : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konsensus.v1i4.284

Abstract

The digital age has revolutionized many aspects of life, including the way we negotiate. Digital platforms such as social media, email and video conferencing have opened up new opportunities to negotiate with parties around the world. However, these changes also present new challenges that require adaptive and innovative negotiation strategies. This research aims to observe and understand the interactions and dynamics of negotiations taking place on digital platforms. Qualitative methods were used to analyze effective negotiation strategies in the digital era through various digital platforms. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with digital platform users, direct observation of the negotiation process on digital platforms, as well as a literacy review of previous research. The results show that negotiations are increasingly turning to online platforms that offer flexibility, wide coverage and easy access to information. However, digital negotiations also face significant challenges such as a lack of non-verbal communication, difficulty in building trust, and potential technological disruptions. To create effective negotiations in the digital age, an adaptive strategy is needed that takes into account the unique characteristics of digital negotiations and helps companies reach mutually beneficial agreements. This strategy includes seven steps outlined by Poerwanto (2014), namely preparation, first contact, assessment, confrontation, conciliation, solution, and post-negotiation.
Co-Authors ABDUL HAMID Akhmad Nawawi Amelia Pratiwi Annabilla Zahra Azi Wiranda Dinda Rizqia Maulana Dzulkifli Hadi Imawan Fachrizal Fachrizal Fahriansah Fahriansah Fahriansah Haqqiya, Hannafa Hasan Sazali Hu’shila Awalia Khairul Anuar bin Ahmad Khairul Muna Lilik Sumarni M. Yahya Muh. Arief Budiman Muhammad Hulaifi Muhammad Yulian Ma’mun Munardi, Benny Mutiah Khaira Sihotang Rabiati Rabiati Siti Fatimah Uswah Hasanah Zefri Maulana Zubir Zubir