Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.235
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA SPEKTRA: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sains Bioedusiana: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Biology and Education Journal (BaEJ) Asian Journal of Science Education
Rahmayumita, Restesa
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Education Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Development of Critical Thinking Skills Instruments : Cases for Essay Tests Hidayati, Nurkhairo; Suryanti, Suryanti; Rahmayumita, Restesa; Aisya, Selvira
Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): March
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33394/jk.v10i1.10052

Abstract

This research aims to develop a rubric used to assess students’ critical thinking. This rubric refers to aspects of Ennis' critical thinking. The research method begins with determining the scope of the rubric so that an initial version of the rubric can be prepared. An initial version of the rubric received peer review. Next, the rubric was tested to assess critical thinking tests with essay-type questions. Data analysis was carried out using Cohen's kappa, while aspects of the critical thinking rubric were analyzed descriptively. The research results show that each aspect of critical thinking has been equipped with descriptors that can be used by raters. The level of reliability based on the kappa value of agreement is quite good, which means that different raters can use the rubric consistently. The value of agreement in the basic clarification aspect is 0.33 (fair), bases for a decision (0.571 in the moderate category), inference (0.455, moderate category), advanced clarification (0.250, fair category, supposition and integration (0.250, fair category), and strategies and tactics (0.182, poor category). Then, it can be concluded that the critical thinking rubric developed can be used to assess critical thinking abilities. As a recommendation, of course, this rubric cannot fulfill all types of critical thinking questions tested. It is also necessary to develop rubrics for question types other than essays to accommodate the wider need for critical thinking rubrics.
Co-Authors Afiqah, Nurul Aisya, Selvira Erlina Wati Kusumasari, Anggi M. Rahmad Miftahul Jannah Muhammad Nasir Novriandami, Aldila Nurkhairo Hidayati Roza Linda Sari, anggi kusuma Suryanti Yustini, Suri