Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

PENERAPAN ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT DALAM PELAYANAN ADMINISTRASI KEPENDUDUKAN DI KABUPATEN LUWU Halim, Tiara; Hakim, Lukman; Parawu, Hafiz Elfiansyah
Kajian Ilmiah Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik (KIMAP) Vol 6, No 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/kimap.v6i1.17483

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out how electronic government is implemented in population administration services at the Luwu Regency Population and Civil Registration Service in the aspects of support, capacity and value. The method in this research uses qualitative research methods with descriptive research type. The results of this research indicate that the implementation of electronic government in population administration services at the Population and Civil Registration Service of Luwu Regency is in the good category. However, analysis shows that the implementation of electronic government in population administration services has not been fully implemented, such as making family cards, birth certificates, death certificates, marriage certificates and other population certificates because people prefer to register manually rather than online because the website is still in progress. improvements and people who are not used to using information technology are reluctant to access the websites provided and prefer to meet face to face if they need services.
Ethical Mechanisms in Preventing Bureaucratic Corruption: A Comparative Study across Indonesian Government Institutions Abdi, Abdi; Parawu, Hafiz Elfiansya; Hartaman, Nursaleh
Journal of Government and Civil Society Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Journal of Government and Civil Society (October)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/jgcs.v9i2.14541

Abstract

Bureaucratic corruption in Indonesia remains a serious problem despite the establishment of various oversight institutions since the 1998 Reform era. This article aims to analyze the role of ethical mechanisms in preventing bureaucratic corruption through a comparative study of three main institutions: Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia (ORI), and Inspectorate General (Itjen) within the ministry. This research uses a qualitative approach with literature study methods, analysis of official documents, and utilization of online data from credible sources. The findings show that the implementation of bureaucratic ethics plays a significant role in reducing the potential for corruptive behavior. KPK implements a strict internal code of ethics and manages various integrity strengthening programs such as the Integrity Assessment Survey (SPI) and Integrity Zone (ZI) to instill an anti-corruption culture within the government. ORI focuses on preventing maladministration and enforcing ethical standards in public services, which serves as a bulwark against petty corruption. Meanwhile, Itjen carries out the function of internal supervision and fostering the integrity of the state civil apparatus (ASN), although it faces challenges in terms of independence and limited resources. Comparatively, the three institutions complement each other. KPK has an advantage in terms of national prosecution and coordination, ORI excels in monitoring public service ethics, and Itjen plays a role in early detection of internal bureaucratic irregularities. Ethical mechanisms such as the implementation of a code of ethics, the development of an integrity system, and the implementation of ethics-based supervision have proven effective in improving accountability and preventing bureaucratic corruption.Korupsi birokrasi di Indonesia masih menjadi persoalan serius meskipun berbagai lembaga pengawas telah dibentuk sejak era Reformasi 1998. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran mekanisme etik dalam mencegah korupsi birokrasi melalui studi komparatif terhadap tiga institusi utama: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), Ombudsman Republik Indonesia (ORI), dan Inspektorat Jenderal (Itjen) di lingkungan kementerian. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi literatur, analisis dokumen resmi, serta pemanfaatan data daring dari sumber yang kredibel. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa penerapan etika birokrasi berperan signifikan dalam mengurangi potensi perilaku koruptif. KPK menerapkan kode etik internal yang ketat serta mengelola berbagai program penguatan integritas seperti Survei Penilaian Integritas (SPI) dan Zona Integritas (ZI) guna menanamkan budaya antikorupsi di lingkungan pemerintah. ORI berfokus pada pencegahan maladministrasi dan penegakan standar etika pelayanan publik, yang menjadi benteng terhadap praktik korupsi kecil (petty corruption). Sementara itu, Itjen menjalankan fungsi pengawasan internal dan pembinaan integritas aparatur sipil negara (ASN), meskipun menghadapi tantangan pada aspek independensi dan keterbatasan sumber daya. Secara komparatif, ketiga institusi tersebut saling melengkapi. KPK memiliki keunggulan dalam hal penindakan dan koordinasi nasional, ORI unggul dalam pengawasan etika pelayanan publik, dan Itjen berperan dalam deteksi dini terhadap penyimpangan internal birokrasi. Mekanisme etik seperti penerapan kode etik, pembangunan sistem integritas, dan pelaksanaan pengawasan berbasis etika terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan akuntabilitas dan mencegah korupsi birokrasi.