Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.922
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Law Research Review Quarterly Indonesian Journal of Police Studies IJPD (International Journal Of Public Devotion) Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Literasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Inovasi TEKSTUR : Jurnal Teknologi Infrastruktur Priviet Social Sciences Journal Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services
Rochman, Auliya
Lawyer And Solicitor, Auliya Rochman Law Office, Sragen
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Perbandingan Hukum Pembiayaan Modal Ventura dan Pembiayaan Al-Musyarakah Kepada Perusahaan Pasangan Usaha Terkait Pemberian Keuntungan Modal Naridha, Alifah Nur Fitriana; Rochman, Auliya; Ikhsan, Sy. Muhammad; Prayudha, Tengku Andrias; Banjarnahor, David
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 4 No 7 (2025): October
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v4i7.606

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis perbandingan hukum antara pembiayaan modal ventura dan pembiayaan al-musyarakah terhadap perusahaan pasangan usaha dalam kaitannya dengan pembagian keuntungan modal. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami kesamaan dan perbedaan aspek hukum kedua bentuk pembiayaan tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), metode penelitian, termasuk tinjauan pustaka dan analisis induktif, untuk mengumpulkan data. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembiayaan modal ventura melibatkan investasi di perusahaan dengan tujuan pembagian keuntungan sesuai dengan formula yang disepakati, sedangkan pembiayaan al-musyarakah dicirikan oleh kerja sama antara nasabah dan lembaga keuangan Islam untuk membagi keuntungan dan membagi risiko.. Kedua bentuk pembiayaan ini sama-sama memiliki karakteristik risiko tinggi karena menempatkan penyertaan modal sebagai dasar pembagian keuntungan dan kerugian. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya kejelasan klausul perjanjian untuk menjaga keseimbangan hak dan kewajiban para pihak serta meminimalkan potensi kerugian. Katakunci :Keuntungan Modal, Pembiayaan Modal Ventura,Pembiayaan Musyarakah.
Social Transformation in the Platform Economy: A Critical Analysis of Legal Protection for Gig Economy Workers in the City of Pontianak Rochman, Auliya; Mandala, Yoga; Zulkarnain, Zulkarnain; Miftah, Dani; Putra, Rafi Dwi Cahya
Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora Vol 16, No 3 (2025): Special Issue 2025
Publisher : Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/j-psh.v16i3.102197

Abstract

This study aims to critically analyze the contribution of platform economy jobs to the income and economic stability of gig workers, examine the influence of legal status on access to social security, and assess the implications of work flexibility on the welfare of gig workers in Pontianak City. The growing phenomenon of the gig economy through platforms such as Gojek, Grab, Maxim, and ShopeeFood has opened up job opportunities for the community, but on the other hand, it has created unstable forms of employment with minimal legal protection. This study uses a qualitative approach by combining legal and sociological analysis. Primary data was obtained through in-depth interviews with drivers, couriers, labor unions, and officials from the Pontianak City Manpower Office. Secondary data was collected from labor regulations, official reports, and academic literature related to the platform economy. The results show that gig work contributes significantly to income, but is unstable due to long working hours, account performance, customer ratings, and non-transparent application algorithms. The status of workers as “partners” means that they have no social security, such as BPJS Ketenagakerjaan (Employment Social Security) and BPJS Kesehatan (Health Social Security), which must be borne entirely by the workers themselves. Furthermore, claims of work flexibility are proven to be illusory because workers are required to remain active to avoid a decline in orders ("anyep"). Job risks, including operational costs, accidents, and application penalties, are entirely borne by the workers. These findings emphasize the need for new, more inclusive policies to ensure legal and social protection for gig workers in Pontianak City.
The regulator’s dilemma in proving algorithmic cartels against the principle of fair competition in the digital economy era Prayudha, Tengku Andrias; Banjarnahor, David; Rochman, Auliya; Ikhsan, Sy. Muhammad; Naridha, Alifah Nur Fitriana
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i12.1064

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital economy, marked by the adoption of pricing algorithms, has introduced new dynamics to Indonesia's competition law landscape. Algorithmic systems enable autonomous price setting based on market data learning without direct human intervention. This condition potentially gives rise to algorithmic cartels, a form of market coordination occurring without explicit agreement, yet producing anti-competitive effects similar to conventional cartels. The national legal framework, specifically Law No. 5 of 1999 and KPPU Regulation No. 4 of 2010, remains inadequate to address this phenomenon, as it is still anchored to a traditional paradigm requiring the element of “agreement” as a prerequisite for proving violation. This study aims to analyze the dilemma faced by the regulator (KPPU) in proving the existence of algorithmic cartels against the principle of fair competition in the digital era. Employing a normative juridical approach, this study examines relevant legislation, academic literature, and international policies from the OECD and European Commission. The findings indicate a regulatory gap in Indonesia's competition law regarding proof involving autonomous systems. Furthermore, the KPPU faces conceptual and technical obstacles in determining legal intent (legal intent) and the validity of digital evidence derived from algorithmic systems. The study concludes that proving algorithmic cartels must shift from an intent-based approach to an effects-based approach, which focuses on assessing the economic impact on market structure and consumer welfare. Therefore, strategic recommendations include reinterpreting the element of “agreement” in Article 1, paragraph 7, and Article 11 of Law No. 5 of 1999 to encompass algorithmic coordination that generates anti-competitive effects. Additionally, the KPPU is mandated to develop digital evidence guidelines and strengthen the multidisciplinary institutional capacity to effectively oversee algorithmic behavior. These steps are crucial for Indonesian competition law to adapt to the realities of the digital economy while ensuring justice and legal certainty.
Co-Authors Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha Arif, Ibnu Ayu Catherine, Liany Banjarnahor, David Boy Rangga, Boy Catherine, Liany Ayu Ekamukti Andini, Febby Ikhsan, Sy. Muhammad Ikhsan, Syarif Muhammad Ira, Nurmaya Putri Miftah, Dani Mukti, Plasma Versiana Naridha, Alifah Nur Fitriana Ningrum Palureng, Rurika Widya Nurul Fadilah, Nurul Parapat, Henry Anderson Putra, Rafi Dwi Cahya Ratih, Ayuk Nila Rupita, Rupita Safriadi Tengku Andrias Prayudha Teresa, Roma Widya Ningrum Palureng, Rurika Yoga Mandala Zulkarnain Zulkarnain