Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Preventive Legal Education and Digital Literacy on the Dangers of Online Gambling for Students of Kapuas Pontianak Private High School Rangga, Boy; Rupita, Rupita; Arif, Ibnu; Mandala, Yoga; Zulkarnain, Zulkarnain; Ningrum Palureng, Rurika Widya; Safriadi, Safriadi; Ira, Nurmaya Putri; Ikhsan, Syarif Muhammad; Catherine, Liany Ayu; Rochman, Auliya; Teresa, Roma; Mukti, Plasma Versiana; Banjarnahor, David; Parapat, Henry Anderson; Prayudha, Tengku Andrias
International Journal of Public Devotion Vol 8, No 1 (2025): January - July 2025
Publisher : STKIP Singkawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26737/ijpd.v8i1.7385

Abstract

The problem of teenagers' involvement in online gambling practices is a crucial issue that requires educative and preventive handling. This fact has caused concern among teachers and principals of private high schools in Kapuas Pontianak. Private SMAs in Pontianak City have never received education on online gambling practices so they need it as an effort to prevent their students from participating in online gambling practices. This Community Service activity aims to provide preventive legal education and digital literacy to students of SMA Swasta Kapuas Pontianak City as an initial step to prevent online gambling practices. The methods used included interactive lectures and dissemination of educational materials. The evaluation of the activity was attended by 35 participants by providing descriptive impressions and messages and the results of the evaluation indicated an increased awareness of the risks and legal impacts of online gambling. This finding proves that an integrative approach between legal aspects and digital literacy is effective in building students' understanding and critical attitude towards digital threats. This activity is important as an educational intervention model that can be replicated in other schools, as well as developed in the form of a long-term school-based education programme on the dangers of online gambling practices.Edukasi Hukum Preventif dan Literasi Digital Tentang Bahaya Judi Online Bagi Siswa SMA Swasta Kapuas PontianakABSTRAKPermasalahan maraknya keterlibatan remaja dalam praktik judi online menjadi isu krusial yang memerlukan penanganan edukatif dan preventif. Fakta yang terjadi ini membuat kekhawatiran para guru dan kepala sekolah SMA Swasta Kapuas Pontianak. SMA Swasta Kota Pontianak belum pernah mendapatkan edukasi terhadap praktek judi online sehingga mereka memerlukan hal tersebut sebagai upaya untuk mencegah siswa dan siswi mereka ikut dalam praktek judi online. Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk memberikan edukasi hukum preventif dan literasi digital kepada siswa SMA Swasta Kapuas Kota Pontianak sebagai langkah awal pencegahan terhadap praktik judi online. Metode yang digunakan meliputi ceramah interaktif serta penyebaran materi edukatif. Evaluasi egiatan diikuti oleh 35 peserta dengan meberikan kesan dan pesan secara deskriptif dan hasil dari evaluasi tersebutpeserta mengindikasikan peningkatan kesadaran terhadap risiko dan dampak hukum dari judi online. Temuan ini membuktikan bahwa pendekatan integratif antara aspek hukum dan literasi digital efektif dalam membangun pemahaman dan sikap kritis siswa terhadap ancaman digital. Kegiatan ini penting sebagai model intervensi edukatif yang dapat direplikasi di sekolah lain, serta dikembangkan dalam bentuk program edukasi jangka panjang berbasis sekolah tentang bahaya praktek judi online.Kata Kunci :Judi online; Edukasi hukum; Literasi digital 
Legal Aid Institutions as a State Solution for the Poor in Getting Legal Protection Rochman, Auliya
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Civil Rights and Advocacy: Controversial and Contemporary Issues
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v2i2.23017

Abstract

This study examines how the rules of the Legal Aid Institute in providing legal protection to the poor in Indonesia. As well as how the implementation of legal aid institutions in Indonesia in providing legal protection to the poor to examine the problem, the research methods used are; normative legal research methods with the statute approach, and the conceptual approach. The legal material collection technique used in this research is literature study. Research results confirm that poverty is one of the biggest problems in upholding human rights in obtaining legal assistance. The human rights approach is one of the basic principles of the government in serving people who are unable to overcome or provide legal protection in facing legal problems that are being faced either criminal, civil or state administration, so that the rights of the poor are not lost. Implementation of Providing Legal Aid is a law of social justice, where these values ​​include respecting the dignity and rights of individuals before the law, addressing the imbalance of power and legal injustice between the rich and the poor.
Perbandingan Hukum Pembiayaan Modal Ventura dan Pembiayaan Al-Musyarakah Kepada Perusahaan Pasangan Usaha Terkait Pemberian Keuntungan Modal Naridha, Alifah Nur Fitriana; Rochman, Auliya; Ikhsan, Sy. Muhammad; Prayudha, Tengku Andrias; Banjarnahor, David
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 4 No 7 (2025): October
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v4i7.606

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis perbandingan hukum antara pembiayaan modal ventura dan pembiayaan al-musyarakah terhadap perusahaan pasangan usaha dalam kaitannya dengan pembagian keuntungan modal. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami kesamaan dan perbedaan aspek hukum kedua bentuk pembiayaan tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), metode penelitian, termasuk tinjauan pustaka dan analisis induktif, untuk mengumpulkan data. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembiayaan modal ventura melibatkan investasi di perusahaan dengan tujuan pembagian keuntungan sesuai dengan formula yang disepakati, sedangkan pembiayaan al-musyarakah dicirikan oleh kerja sama antara nasabah dan lembaga keuangan Islam untuk membagi keuntungan dan membagi risiko.. Kedua bentuk pembiayaan ini sama-sama memiliki karakteristik risiko tinggi karena menempatkan penyertaan modal sebagai dasar pembagian keuntungan dan kerugian. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya kejelasan klausul perjanjian untuk menjaga keseimbangan hak dan kewajiban para pihak serta meminimalkan potensi kerugian. Katakunci :Keuntungan Modal, Pembiayaan Modal Ventura,Pembiayaan Musyarakah.
Social Transformation in the Platform Economy: A Critical Analysis of Legal Protection for Gig Economy Workers in the City of Pontianak Rochman, Auliya; Mandala, Yoga; Zulkarnain, Zulkarnain; Miftah, Dani; Putra, Rafi Dwi Cahya
Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora Vol 16, No 3 (2025): Special Issue 2025
Publisher : Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/j-psh.v16i3.102197

Abstract

This study aims to critically analyze the contribution of platform economy jobs to the income and economic stability of gig workers, examine the influence of legal status on access to social security, and assess the implications of work flexibility on the welfare of gig workers in Pontianak City. The growing phenomenon of the gig economy through platforms such as Gojek, Grab, Maxim, and ShopeeFood has opened up job opportunities for the community, but on the other hand, it has created unstable forms of employment with minimal legal protection. This study uses a qualitative approach by combining legal and sociological analysis. Primary data was obtained through in-depth interviews with drivers, couriers, labor unions, and officials from the Pontianak City Manpower Office. Secondary data was collected from labor regulations, official reports, and academic literature related to the platform economy. The results show that gig work contributes significantly to income, but is unstable due to long working hours, account performance, customer ratings, and non-transparent application algorithms. The status of workers as "partners" means that they have no social security, such as BPJS Ketenagakerjaan (Employment Social Security) and BPJS Kesehatan (Health Social Security), which must be borne entirely by the workers themselves. Furthermore, claims of work flexibility are proven to be illusory because workers are required to remain active to avoid a decline in orders ("anyep"). Job risks, including operational costs, accidents, and application penalties, are entirely borne by the workers. These findings emphasize the need for new, more inclusive policies to ensure legal and social protection for gig workers in Pontianak City.
The regulator’s dilemma in proving algorithmic cartels against the principle of fair competition in the digital economy era Prayudha, Tengku Andrias; Banjarnahor, David; Rochman, Auliya; Ikhsan, Sy. Muhammad; Naridha, Alifah Nur Fitriana
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i12.1064

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital economy, marked by the adoption of pricing algorithms, has introduced new dynamics to Indonesia's competition law landscape. Algorithmic systems enable autonomous price setting based on market data learning without direct human intervention. This condition potentially gives rise to algorithmic cartels, a form of market coordination occurring without explicit agreement, yet producing anti-competitive effects similar to conventional cartels. The national legal framework, specifically Law No. 5 of 1999 and KPPU Regulation No. 4 of 2010, remains inadequate to address this phenomenon, as it is still anchored to a traditional paradigm requiring the element of “agreement” as a prerequisite for proving violation. This study aims to analyze the dilemma faced by the regulator (KPPU) in proving the existence of algorithmic cartels against the principle of fair competition in the digital era. Employing a normative juridical approach, this study examines relevant legislation, academic literature, and international policies from the OECD and European Commission. The findings indicate a regulatory gap in Indonesia's competition law regarding proof involving autonomous systems. Furthermore, the KPPU faces conceptual and technical obstacles in determining legal intent (legal intent) and the validity of digital evidence derived from algorithmic systems. The study concludes that proving algorithmic cartels must shift from an intent-based approach to an effects-based approach, which focuses on assessing the economic impact on market structure and consumer welfare. Therefore, strategic recommendations include reinterpreting the element of “agreement” in Article 1, paragraph 7, and Article 11 of Law No. 5 of 1999 to encompass algorithmic coordination that generates anti-competitive effects. Additionally, the KPPU is mandated to develop digital evidence guidelines and strengthen the multidisciplinary institutional capacity to effectively oversee algorithmic behavior. These steps are crucial for Indonesian competition law to adapt to the realities of the digital economy while ensuring justice and legal certainty.