Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.462
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Eka Prasetya Jurnal Scientia Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial NUSRA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Ilmu Pendidikan Jurnal Keadilan Pemilu Keadilan: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Peradilan Khazanah Hukum
Alwi Al Hadad
Universitas Teknologi Digital
Religion Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pengawasan terhadap Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perspektif Teori Checks and Balances dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Elfid Nurfitra Mubarok; Alwi Al Hadad
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Khazanah Hukum Vol 3, No 1 April (2021)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Masalah Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan peneliatian normative dengan pendekatan kualitatif. penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami bagaimana desain model pengawasan hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor No. 49/PUU-IX/2011 serta meninjuau dengan teori check and balances dalam menakar kembali pengawasan hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa model pengawasan hakim mahkamah konstitusi saat ini yang hanya melalui pengawasan internal tidak memenuhi teori checks and balances sehingga rawan terhadap timbulnya sikap kesewenang-wenanganan oleh karenanya perlu adanya pengawasan yang lebih independen dalam mengawasi serta menindaklanjuti setiap perbuatan hakim yang dianggap bersimpangan dengan aturan yang telah ditetapkan. Maka dengan adanya hal tersebut Model pengawasan terhadap hakim Mankamah Konstitusi yang dianggap memenuhi prinsip teori checks and balances dapat dijadikan solusi dalam menangani permasalahan yang ada
Fortifying Democracy: Deploying Electoral Justice for Robust Personal Data Protection in the Indonesian Election Uu Nurul Huda; Dian Rachmat Gumelar; Alwi Al Hadad
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 1 April (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v6i1.30734

Abstract

Elections stand as a cornerstone of democracy, yet the burgeoning integration of technology and personal data underscores the pressing need for safeguarding individual privacy within the electoral process. This study endeavors to scrutinize the efficacy of the Electoral Justice System in fortifying the protection of personal data throughout the registration, verification, and adjudication phases of political party participation in the forthcoming 2024 elections. Through an empirical juridical methodology, this research delves into the practical application of the Electoral Justice System across diverse national contexts, elucidating its role in mitigating the perils of data misuse and upholding electoral integrity. The findings underscore the imperative of imbuing the Electoral Justice System with structural robustness, substantive fidelity, and a conducive legal culture to ensure the seamless functioning of electoral processes. Additionally, stringent regulations, robust data verification protocols, independent oversight mechanisms, and punitive measures emerge as indispensable facets of effective Electoral Justice System implementation, essential for curtailing infringements of the exploitation of personal data and fostering accountable electoral practices.
BUREAUCRATIC PATHOLOGIES AND EXECUTIVE DEFIANCE IN COASTAL MINING CONCESSIONS: A POLITICAL AND CRIMINAL LAW PERSPECTIVE Alwi Al Hadad; Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko; Shaifullah
Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Vol 19 No 1 (2026): Volume 19 Nomor 1: Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja
Publisher : Fakultas Politik Pemerintahan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33701/jppdp.v19i1.6389

Abstract

The centralization of electronic mining licensing in Indonesia has given rise to bureaucratic pathologies in the form of sectoral egos that undermine local autonomy and threaten the sustainability of coastal ecosystems. This study aims to deconstruct legal anomalies and political dynamics in governance regarding the issuance of mining operation permits on small islands, analyze the impasse in litigation practices, and formulate a framework for resolving the dysfunction in the execution of administrative court rulings (PTUN). Through a normative legal research method employing legislative, conceptual, and case-based approaches to Supreme Court Decision No. 650 K/TUN/2022, this study identifies three structural flaws. First, the central government’s erroneous application of the lex specialis doctrine has prioritized the mining exploitation regime over imperative instruments for the protection of coastal ecosystems. Second, the absence of enforceable executive instruments within the PTUN procedural law triggers institutional defiance, where decisions to revoke permits become ineffective and merely create an illusion of environmental justice. Third, this systemic weakness is exploited by administrative officials through the manipulation of issuing new disputed objects (permit recycling) to circumvent the court’s ruling. As a solution, this paper recommends a paradigm shift from formal-procedural oversight toward outcome-based governance evaluation. This must be accompanied by the absolute blocking of an integrated geospatial data-based permitting system, as well as the imposition of dwangsom (compulsory fines) directly levied on the personal assets of state officials and the integration of criminal law enforcement against defiant bureaucrats to break the chain of administrative law circumvention. Keywords: Bureaucratic Pathologies; Executive Defiance; Licensing Centralization; Political Dynamics; Criminal Liability.
Co-Authors ADE HIKMAT Elfid Nurfitra Mubarok Gumelar, Dian Rachmat Hani Harafani Imroni, Asep Ina Marlina Iskandar Iskandar Julianti, Kania Puja Litya Surisdani Anggraeniko Mamok Andri Senubekti Rais Apriyadi, Moh Taufik Shaifullah Syafi’i, Imam Uu Nurul Huda, Uu Nurul