Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.064
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IRJE (Indonesian Research Journal in Education) Edu Riligia: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam dan Keagamaan Contagion: Scientific Periodical Journal of Public Health and Coastal Health EDU RILIGIA: Journal of Islamic and Religious Education Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Islam & Contemporary Issues Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) Marpokat: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Quru’: Journal of Family Law and Culture Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman STATIKA Statika
Anwar Habibi Siregar
Universitas Islam Negeri Syahada Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The Paradox of Law Enforcement on Exoneration Clauses in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis of Mawardi's Fiqh Siyasah and Strict Liability Principle Manahan Siregar, Khoiruddin; Gunawan, Hendra; Habibi Siregar, Anwar
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 29, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/madania.v29i2.9544

Abstract

This study aims to examine the paradox of law enforcement regarding exemption clauses in Indonesia, strengthening the analysis from the perspective of fiqh siyasah (Islamic political jurisprudence) concerning the role of the state in guaranteeing substantive justice and protecting the rights of the mustadh'afin (consumers). The research critiques the inconsistency in judicial interpretation and the tension between the principle of contractual freedom and consumer protection, despite the Consumer Protection Law explicitly prohibiting businesses from exempting themselves from liability. Based on a comparison of pivotal court decisions, such as Decision Number 385/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sby and Decision Number 334 PK/Pdt/2014, this normative legal research employs legislative, case, and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that the strict liability principle—designed to strengthen consumers' bargaining position and eliminate the burden of proving fault—is often disregarded by judges who still adhere to classical principles from the Civil Code. From a fiqh siyasah perspective, this inconsistency reflects the state's failure (through the judiciary) to fulfill its duty as the protector of the people (ri'ayah) and the enforcer of public welfare (jalb al-mashalih), especially in addressing structural imbalances between businesses and consumers. Consequently, exemption clauses remain prevalent in sectors such as banking, transportation, insurance, and digital services. The study concludes that harmonizing judicial practices with consumer protection norms must be based on the principles of substantive justice and the state's moral responsibility (mas'uliyyah daulah) in preventing systemic injustice, which is the essence of siyasah syar'iyyah in regulating contractual relationships. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji paradoks penegakan hukum terhadap klausula eksonerasi di Indonesia, dengan memperkuat analisis dari perspektif fiqih siyasah mengenai peran negara dalam menjamin keadilan substantif dan melindungi hak-hak mustadh’afin (konsumen). Studi ini mengkritisi inkonsistensi penafsiran hakim dan ketegangan antara asas kebebasan berkontrak dan perlindungan konsumen, meskipun Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen secara tegas melarang pelaku usaha membebaskan diri dari tanggung jawab. Berdasarkan perbandingan putusan-putusan penting, seperti Putusan Nomor 385/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sby dan Putusan Nomor 334 PK/Pdt/2014, penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual ini menunjukkan bahwa prinsip strict liability—yang dirancang untuk memperkuat posisi konsumen—sering diabaikan oleh hakim yang masih berpegang pada asas klasik Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Dalam perspektif fiqih siyasah, inkonsistensi ini mencerminkan kegagalan negara (melalui kekuasaan kehakiman) dalam menjalankan tugasnya sebagai pelindung rakyat (ri’ayah) dan penegak kemaslahatan (jalb al-mashalih), terutama dalam mengatasi ketimpangan struktural antara pelaku usaha dan konsumen. Implikasinya, klausula eksonerasi tetap marak di sektor perbankan, transportasi, asuransi, dan layanan digital. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa harmonisasi antara praktik peradilan dan norma perlindungan konsumen harus didasarkan pada prinsip keadilan substantif serta tanggung jawab moral negara (mas'uliyyah daulah) dalam mencegah kedzaliman sistemik, sebagaimana menjadi esensi dari siyasah syar’iyyah dalam pengaturan hubungan kontraktual.
The Relationship between Sunnah and Local Culture: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Walimah Practices in Contemporary Muslim Communities Anwar Habibi Siregar; Febri Amalia
QURU’: Journal of Family Law and Culture Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): QURU’: Journal of Family Law and Culture
Publisher : Pusat Studi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59698/quru.v4i2.380

Abstract

This study is grounded in the practice of walimah within Muslim societies, which is understood not only as a Prophetic tradition (sunnah) but also as a socio-cultural practice shaped by local customs. Normatively, walimah embodies values of gratitude, publicizing marriage, strengthening social ties, simplicity, and spiritual blessing. However, in practice, walimah has undergone a process of meaning expansion through the incorporation of customary elements, social status symbols, entertainment, and ceremonial elaboration, which may deviate from the Islamic principle of moderation. This study addresses the research questions of how the relationship between sunnah and local traditions is negotiated in the practice of walimah, and to what extent local culture can be accommodated within the framework of Islamic law without undermining its religious substance. This research employs a qualitative-descriptive approach with a socio-legal perspective. Data were collected through a comprehensive literature review of Islamic legal sources, including the Qur’an, Hadith, classical fiqh texts, and scholarly works on local cultural practices related to walimah. The analysis focuses on examining the interplay between normative Islamic legal principles as the ideal framework and lived social practices as empirical realities. The findings reveal that the relationship between sunnah and tradition in walimah is inherently negotiative. Local traditions can enrich the practice of walimah insofar as they do not contradict core Islamic principles such as permissibility (halal), moderation, public welfare (maslahah), and the prohibition of excess (israf). The study concludes that the ideal form of walimah is one that positions sunnah as the foundational value, while local culture serves as a contextual medium of social expression governed by Islamic ethical norms. The academic contribution of this research lies in strengthening socio-legal approaches within Islamic family law studies, particularly in understanding the dynamic interaction between religious norms and cultural practices in contemporary Muslim societies.
The Impact of a Peer-Led Islamic Moderation Program on Mental Well-being and Violent Extremism Prevention among Indonesian Students Budiman Budiman; Anwar Habibi Siregar; Diva Nada Rizki Nuzlan; Apriliani Apriliani; Putra Apriadi Siregar; Muhammad Rezebri; Cynthia Zebua
Contagion: Scientific Periodical Journal of Public Health and Coastal Health Vol 7, No 2 (2025): CONTAGION
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/contagion.v7i2.28672

Abstract

Introduction: Violent extremism among students is a problem that must be addressed, and religious moderation programs are expected to be one effective intervention in improving psychological resilience. This study aims to evaluate the impact of religious moderation education on enhancing religious moderation among university students, with a focus on changes in national commitment, religious knowledge, tolerance, and anti-violent understanding. Method: This study employed a quantitative approach with a single-group pretest-posttest design and was conducted in a province in Indonesia from June to November 2024. The research participants consisted of 39 students involved in a religious moderation education intervention program. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire focusing on four main indicators of religious moderation. The data were then analyzed using a paired sample t-test with JASP version 19. Results: Findings showed a statistically significant increase in all variables after the intervention. National commitment increased from 27.15 to 31.82 (p < 0.001); religious knowledge from 30.33 to 31.95 (p = 0.008); tolerance from 32.69 to 34.10 (p = 0.032); and understanding of anti-violence from 34.10 to 35.79 (p = 0.020). Conclusion: Structured religious moderation education can enhance students' religious moderation by integrating Islamic identity and national responsibility.  Keywords: Religious Moderation; Psychological Resilience; Islamic Education; Extremism; Mental Health
Co-Authors Apriliani, Apriliani Budiman Budiman Cynthia Zebua Diva Nada Rizki Nuzlan Febri Amalia Harahap, Sahrul HENDRA GUNAWAN B11211055 Hendra Gunawan MA Manahan Siregar, Khoiruddin Muhammad Rezebri Nasution, Leoly Ahadiathul Akhiriah Nurkhasanah Rina Puspita Nursyaidah Putra Apriadi Siregar Sahrul Harahap