Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DENGAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA DIBAWAH 50 JUTA RUPIAH Tri Lestari; Burham Pranawa; Tegar Harbriyana Putra
JURNAL EKONOMI, SOSIAL & HUMANIORA Vol 7 No 02 (2025): INTELEKTIVA : JURNAL EKONOMI, SOSIAL DAN HUMANIORA - EDISI MEI -AGUSTUS 2025
Publisher : KULTURA DIGITAL MEDIA ( Research and Academic Publication Consulting )

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The increasing number of corruption crimes in Indonesia has caused significant losses to state finances, including in cases with losses below 50 million rupiah. The legal handling based on Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption. However, in practice, minor corruption cases are often resolved through a restorative justice approach, as regulated by the Attorney General’s Circular and Prosecutor Regulation No. 15 of 2020. This study aims to examine the implementation of law in handling corruption cases involving state losses below 50 million rupiah, particularly from the perspective of restorative justice. The research method is normative juridical with a descriptive qualitative approach, relying on secondary data and interviews with the Boyolali District Attorney’s Office. The results indicate that restorative justice is applied to achieve efficiency and effectiveness, provided that the perpetrator is a first-time offender and the loss has been fully returned. The study concludes that while restorative justice in small-scale corruption aligns with legal efficiency, it remains controversial due to its potential contradiction with the principles of the Anti-Corruption Law.
Implementation of Restorative Justice Policy for Children in Conflict with the Law (Case Study of the Women and Children Protection Unit at the Boyolali Police) Virzha Reynata Putri; Tegar Harbriyana Putra; Adhiputro Pangarso Wicaksono
Regulate: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Hukum dan Bisnis Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Penerbit Hellow Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/regulate.v2i3.60

Abstract

The development of criminal law in Indonesia has undergone a significant transformation, especially in handling cases involving children. Therefore, it is important to ensure that children in conflict with the law receive treatment in accordance with the principles of juvenile criminal justice, with a rehabilitative approach that focuses on recovery and social reintegration, not just punishment. This study aims to analyze how the restorative justice approach is applied in handling cases of children in conflict with the law, and to evaluate its ef ectiveness in creating restorative justice that can provide benefits for both perpetrators, victims, and the community. This study uses a juridical-empirical research type. Research data were obtained through interviews, observations and literature studies which were then analyzed using qualitative methods. Overall, the implementation of the restorative justice policy at the Boyolali Police deserves appreciation because it shows an implementation model that is in accordance with regulations. Although the potential for restorative justice is very large, its implementation is not always smooth and is often faced with obstacles that can hinder the achievement of a comprehensive sense of justice. In conclusion, although this policy has great potential in creating fairer and more rehabilitative justice for children, its implementation still requires optimal support through training, socialization, and cross-institutional coordination.
Implementation of the Presumption of Innocence Principle in Civil Procedure Law Risa Amara; Putri Anggraeni Muslimah; Nafisa Sukma Dewi; Tegar Harbriyana Putra
JUSTICES: Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Progressive and Critical Law Review
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58355/justices.v4i3.199

Abstract

Every individual who is charged, suspected, detained, arrested, or brought before the court must be presumed innocent until a court decision establishes their guilt with permanent legal force. This principle is a fundamental pillar of the modern judicial system to ensure the protection of human rights and procedural fairness for all parties involved in the legal process. This study aims to comprehensively describe the application and regulation of the presumption of innocence principle within the context of civil procedural law, which has thus far received less attention and in-depth discussion compared to criminal law. By adopting a normative juridical approach, this research systematically examines and analyzes legal principles, statutory provisions, and relevant doctrines to clarify the philosophical foundations, historical development, and legal basis that form the primary foundation for protecting the rights of the parties involved in civil procedural law. The focus of this study is especially related to the provisions contained in the Civil Procedure Code and the Civil Code. This approach allows for a deeper and more holistic analysis of the implementation of the presumption of innocence and emphasizes its crucial role in maintaining the balance of interests and justice for all parties throughout the judicial process.