Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

COMPARISON STUDY OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM IN SINGAPORE AND HONGKONG Siska, Felia; Irwan, Irwan; Melia, Yenni; Meldawati, Meldawati; Febriani, Trina
PEDAGOGIK : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN Vol 9, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Nurul Jadid University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/pjp.v9i1.3559

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparison of the primary school level school system in Singapore and Hong Kong, to analyze the comparison of the social studies curriculum at the elementary school level in Singapore and Hong Kong. The research method used is the library method with literature reviews from journals, books and other library sources. The results showed that; 1) The education systems in Singapore and Hong Kong have much in common. The school system starts at Kindergarten for 3 years, continues at the Primary or elementary school level. Then Secondary and College Level. The differences in the education systems of the two countries can be seen from the secondary or secondary school level; 2) The social studies education curriculum in Singapore and Hong Kong also has similarities as well as differences. The Social Studies curriculum at Elementary Schools in Singapore integrates the study areas of Geography, History, Economics and Sociology called Social Studies. Meanwhile, Hong Kong is included in the Personal, Social and Humanities Education group material as General Studies.
Spatial assessment of erosion and landslide hazards as indicators of land degradation in Solok Regency, West Sumatra Dasrizal, Dasrizal; Juita, Erna; Wilis, Ratna; Febriandi, Febriandi; Febriani, Trina
Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Brawijaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15243/jdmlm.2026.131.9443

Abstract

This study conducted an integrated spatial assessment to identify and map erosion and landslide threats, determining high-risk degraded areas in Solok Regency. The methods combined the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) within a Geographic Information System (GIS) framework. The analysis revealed a critical disconnect between erosion and landslide risks. Although 52.1% of the total area (?101,500 ha) was classified as safe from erosion (EHI<1), a substantial portion of this “safe” land-39.4% and 6.94% of the total area, respectively, exhibited moderate to high landslide susceptibility. Conversely, within the 37.1% of the area unsafe from erosion (EHI>1), moderate and high landslide susceptibility covered 24.3% and 7.4% of the total area, respectively. These results demonstrated that landslide triggers are independent of surface erosion processes in many areas, often occurring in locations considered "safe" from erosion due to innate geological and geomorphological factors. This complex interplay necessitates distinct yet coordinated mitigation strategies. The findings provide crucial spatial data for safe land use planning and disaster mitigation in Solok Regency, with a methodology applicable to other vulnerable landscapes, such as post-mining areas.