Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal El-Mashlahah Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Reformasi Hukum Usrotuna: Journal of Islamic Family Law
AGUS NURHADI
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Konsep al-Ma’ruf dalam Kewarisan: Mewujudkan Harmonisasi dalam Pembagian Waris pada Suku Semende Migran Bengkulu Ahmad Bahauddin AM; Ahmad Rofiq; Agus Nurhadi; Hakim, Ahmad Luqman
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 57 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v57i2.1350

Abstract

This article examines the collective inheritance distribution system in the Semende migrant community. This article focuses on two aspects: how the inheritance distribution system works in the Semende migrant community in the Kaur Regency and to what extent this inheritance distribution model creates harmony among family members. The data were obtained from academic works and interviews with community leaders in the field. This article concludes that the inheritance distribution in the Semende migrant community in Bengkulu uses a system called “tunggu tubang,” where the eldest daughter (tunggu tubang) keeps and manages the inherited wealth. Inheritance distribution always emphasizes consensus through deliberation. The inheritance distribution in the Semende tribe with the tunggu tubang system has proven to achieve harmony in both the legal system and among families. The research findings show a concept of al-ma'rūf in the inheritance distribution in the Semende migrant community. The idea of al-ma'rūf in the inheritance customs of Semende migrants reflects values respected and firmly held by the community. This concept forms the basis for maintaining harmony, preserving cultural identity, and regulating the inheritance process based on mutual agreement. Artikel ini mengkaji sistem pembagian warisan kolektif pada komunitas Semende migran yang dikelola secara kolektif dan produktif. Kajian dalam artikel ini difokuskan pada dua hal, yakni bagaimana sistem pembagian harta warisan di komunitas Semende migran yang ada di Kabupaten Kaur Provinsi Bengkulu, dan sejauhmana model pembagian warisan tersebut dapat mewujudkan keharmonisan hukum dan keharmonisan di antara anggota keluarga. Data-data dalam artikel ini diperoleh dari literatur ilmiah dan wawancara dengan tokoh masyarakat di komunitas Semende. Menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan perspektif harmoni hukum, artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa pembagian harta warisan pada masyarakat Semende migran di Bengkulu menggunakan sistem yang disebut tunggu tubang, di mana harta warisan disimpan dan dikelola oleh anak perempuan tertua (tunggu tubang). Pembagian harta warisan selalu mengedepankan musyawarah mufakat. Pembagian harta warisan yang ada di suku semende dengan sistem tunggu tubang terbukti dapat mewujudkan keharmonisan baik pada sistem hukum maupun keharmonisan di antara keluarga. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat bangunan konsep al-ma'rūf dalam pembagian warisan pada komunitas Semende migran. Konsep al-ma’rūf dalam kewarisan adat Semende migran ini mencerminkan nilai-nilai yang dihormati dan dipegang teguh oleh masyarakat. Konsep ini membentuk dasar untuk menjaga keharmonisan, memelihara identitas budaya, serta mengatur proses kewarisan dengan prinsip kesepakatan bersama.
The Existence of Legal Protection for Female Workers Against Sexual Exploitation Mode 'Staycation' Selvi Kurniawati; Zahra Putri Maharani Pertiwi; Agus Nurhadi
Reformasi Hukum Vol 28 No 1 (2024): April Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46257/jrh.v28i1.967

Abstract

The term staycation as a connotation of sexual activity in a certain place has become increasingly popular in society, especially after the phenomenon of a viral case in the public. Bosses invited female workers in the company to engage in sexual activities in exchange for certain promises. Female workers are often vulnerable to sexual exploitation in the workplace. This requires legal protection to reduce risks and protect the rights of female workers. This article uses a normative juridical research method with a statutory approach based on various provisions in the TPKS Law and several relevant literatures to analyze aspects of legal protection for female workers. This study finds that the TPKS Law provides an important legal basis to protect women workers from sexual exploitation, including the provision of victims' rights to restitution, handling, recovery, and protection through the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK). This protection is important to prevent backlash from perpetrators and provide a sense of security to victims. Towards effective implementation of legal protection, socialization and education are needed in an effort to increase legal awareness in the community and reduce the incidence of sexual exploitation in the work environment.
Rethinking Vasectomy Policy: MUI’s Fatwas, Ethics, and Economic Coercion in West Java a Maqasid Syari’ah Analysis Ahmad Bahauddin AM; Zulfikar, Eko; Abdul Gofur; Ahmad Baedowi; Mufti Rasyid; Abdurrazak; Agus Nurhadi
El-Mashlahah Vol 15 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.10162

Abstract

Economic hardship remains an unresolved issue in Indonesia. Data from Statistics Indonesia (BPS) shows that 8.57% of the population still earns below IDR 609,160 per month, meaning approximately 24 million people live below the poverty line. The Governor of West Java plans to implement a policy requiring vasectomy as a condition for receiving social assistance, which has sparked controversy in society. This plan indirectly places poor families in a position where they feel compelled to undergo the procedure. They face hidden pressures that limit their freedom of choice, creating ethical tensions between religion, policy implementation, and basic livelihood needs. The study examined the responses of West Java society to objectively evaluate and engage in a comprehensive dialogue about the Governor’s policy plan, which includes vasectomy as a requirement for social assistance, through the lens of maqasid al-syari'ah (the objectives of Islamic law). Using empirical legal research with a mixed-methods approach, the study combined quantitative and qualitative data. Findings reveal that over 60% of respondents underwent vasectomy due to economic incentives or policy pressure rather than personal conviction. Qualitative data also indicate that although the fatwa is understood as a normative reference, in practice, people prioritize social and economic needs. The particular analysis confirms that the fatwa cannot be applied rigidly without considering the structural pressures and ethical dilemmas faced by the community. Through the framework of maqasid al-syari'ah, focusing on daruriyyat (essential needs), particularly hifz al-nafs (preservation of life), hifz al-nasl (preservation of lineage), and hifz al-mal (preservation of wealth), a reinterpretation of the fatwa becomes an ethical imperative.  Then, it ensures Islamic law remains contextual, just, and responsive to contemporary realities, especially when religious authority and state regulations intersect in governing the rights of vulnerable groups.
DINAMIKA PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN YORDANIA: Integrasi Nilai Syari’ah dan Standar Hak Asasi Manusia Achmad, Dliya'uddin; Umul Baroroh; Agus Nurhadi; Achmad Tubagus Surur
Usrotuna: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Usrotuna: Journal of Islamic Family Law
Publisher : Taskuliah Edukasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study analyzes the dynamics of the formation of Jordan's Marriage Law in the context of tensions between Sharia values and human rights standards. The complex political negotiations in the process of forming Jordan's marriage law between reformist groups promoting gender equality in accordance with CEDAW, and religious authorities and conservative groups adhering to classical fiqh interpretations, make Jordan a crucial case study for understanding the dialectic of law in the modern Muslim world. Using a socio-historical approach and descriptive qualitative methods, this literature study examines the legislative process of Law No. 36/2010. The results show that the harmonization achieved is partial and represents a political compromise rather than a complete philosophical integration. Reforms such as the standardization of the age of marriage accompanied by a dispensation clause reflect the state's negotiation between the demands of human rights activists and conservative religious resistance. The study concludes that this law represents an evolutionary modern ijtihad, in which normative reconciliation is more of a negotiation of interests, so that the future of Jordanian family law is expected to continue to follow a pattern of gradual and compromising reform. [Penelitian ini menganalisis dinamika pembentukan Undang-Undang Perkawinan Yordania dalam konteks ketegangan antara nilai syariah dan standar Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Negosiasi politik yang kompleks dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang perkawinan Yordania antara kelompok reformis yang mendorong kesetaraan gender sesuai CEDAW, dengan otoritas keagamaan dan kelompok konservatif yang berpegang pada interpretasi fiqh klasik, membuat Yordania menjadi studi kasus yang krusial untuk memahami dialektika hukum di dunia Muslim modern. Pendekatan sosio-historis dan metode dualitatif deskriptif, studi kepustakaan ini mengkaji proses legislasi UU No. 36/2010 digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa harmonisasi yang dicapai bersifat parsial dan merupakan kompromi politik, bukan integrasi filosofis yang utuh. Reformasi seperti penyeragaman usia nikah diiringi klausul dispensasi, mencerminkan negosiasi negara antara desakan aktivis HAM dan resistensi konservatif agama. Simpulan penelitian menyatakan bahwa UU ini merepresentasikan ijtihad modern yang evolutif, di mana rekonsiliasi normatif lebih merupakan negosiasi kepentingan, sehingga masa depan hukum keluarga Yordania diperkirakan akan tetap mengikuti pola reformasi bertahap dan kompromistis].
Co-Authors Abdul Gofur Abdurrazak Achmad Tubagus Surur Achmad, Dliya'uddin Ahmad Baedowi Ahmad Bahauddin AM Ahmad Luqman Hakim, Ahmad Luqman Ahmad Rofiq Eko Zulfikar Mufti Rasyid Selvi Kurniawati Umul Baroroh Zahra Putri Maharani Pertiwi