Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI SURAT EDARAN MENTERI KETENAGAKERJAAN NO.M/3/HK.04/III/2020 DALAM MELINDUNGI KELANGSUNGAN HIDUP BURUH DAN PELAKU USAHA PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 Otong Syuhada; Aji Halim Rahman
Journal Presumption of Law Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Volume 4 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022
Publisher : Universitas Majalengka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31949/jpl.v4i2.3311

Abstract

The economic crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic has an impact on the employment situation in Indonesia. Seeing this situation, the Central Government through its policies made several efforts to deal with this problem. One form of government policy through the Minister of Manpower issued a Circular Letter of the Minister of Manpower No.M/3/HK.04/III/2020 concerning Protection of Workers/Labourers and Business Continuity in the Context of Prevention and Control of Covid-19, but almost all business actors or companies in responding to the government's policy by limiting social activities, including many companies that have taken the policy to lay off and cut wages for their workers/employees. The research method used is a research specification that is descriptive analytical using a Sociological Juridical Research approach. The research stage is through research that uses primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques are document studies and interviews. The data collection tool uses library data and field data. In accordance with the approach method applied, the data obtained for this study were analyzed in a qualitative juridical manner. deductions from the wages of workers/laborers by employers and finally wage cuts can be made through the agreement of both parties due to the spread of the covid-19 virus as regulated based on the Circular Letter of the Minister of Manpower of the Republic of Indonesia Number M/3/Hk.04/III/2020. In resolving the issue of unilaterally cutting wages, it can be done by means of Bipartite and Tripartite. However, the recommendations issued by the labor agency mediator in this case do not have coercive power for the parties to carry out.
TERBENTUKNYA BUDAYA POLITIK PAROKIAL DALAM TATANAN KEHIDUPAN BERNEGARA YANG DEMOKRATIS Otong Syuhada
Journal Presumption of Law Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Volume 5 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023
Publisher : Universitas Majalengka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31949/jpl.v5i2.6598

Abstract

Budaya politik parokial adalah budaya politik yang dapat merusak tatanan demokrasi, sebab penganut budaya politik ini tidak mau terlibat dalam proses demokrasi. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis factor yang menjadi penyebab terbentunya budaya politik parokial. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis sosiologis dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual, Sedangkan data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder. Dari hasil penelitian ditemukan beberapa faktor yang menjadi penyebab terbentuknya budaya politik parokial seperti diantaranya adalah : Tingkat Pendidikan yang rendah, menganggap sistem politik itu tidak penting dan tidak berpengaruh kepada kehidupannya, politik dianggap sesuatu yang tabu untuk di bicarakan sebab mereka merasa bukan kapasitasnya dan merasa tidak memiliki kapabilitas, maka perlu diberikan pemahaman dan pendidikan politik agar paham pentingnya partisipasi seluruh warga masyarakat dalam berdemokrasi sehingga hak-hak individu sebagai warga negara dapat terlindungi. Oleh karena itu kedepan pemerintah harus segera membuat sebuah regulasi yang tegas untuk mengatasi beberapa faktor yang menjadi penyebab terbentuknya budaya politik parokial.
Indonesia-Malaysia Cooperation In Handling Illegal Immigrants: From The Perspective of International Law and Human Rights Protection Azkia Fathia Kirana Sopian; Otong Syuhada; Rani Dewi Kurniawati
JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law
Publisher : Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30997/jill.v18i1.22042

Abstract

The phenomenon of illegal immigrants in Southeast Asia, particularly in the Indonesia-Malaysia corridor, poses serious challenges related to legal, security, and human rights issues. The complexity of this problem arises from differences in national regulations, weak cross-border surveillance, and high economic pressures that drive irregular migration. This study aims to analyze the extent to which bilateral cooperation between Indonesia and Malaysia in handling illegal immigrants is in accordance with international law and human rights protection principles. The method used is a normative juridical approach, examining international legal instruments such as the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (1990), ICCPR, ICESCR, and various bilateral Memoranda of Understanding (MoU) between the two countries. The results of the study show that, normatively, Indonesia-Malaysia cooperation has referred to international legal standards that emphasize humane treatment, the principle of non-refoulement, and the protection of the basic rights of migrants. However, operationally, its implementation still faces obstacles in the form of weak inter-agency coordination, limited resources, and a lack of independent oversight. These conditions have led to continued human rights violations, particularly in the form of arbitrary detention and limited access to basic services for undocumented migrants. Thus, strengthening monitoring mechanisms, training officers, and involving international organizations are necessary for this cooperation to be more effective, humane, and sustainable in accordance with the principles of international law.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penafsiran Konsep Penguasaan dan Ketepatan Penerapan Pasal dalam Putusan Nomor 96/Pid.B/2025/PN Mjl Rafli Tio Ramdani; Otong Syuhada; Riky Pribadi
Legalita Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Legalita
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47637/legalita.v8i1.2400

Abstract

Studi ini bertujuan mengkaji secara mendalam bagaimana konsep penguasaan dimaknai oleh hakim serta sejauh mana penerapan pasal dalam Putusan Nomor 96/Pid.B/2025/PN Mjl dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara hukum. Perkara yang dikaji mencakup dakwaan berupa tindak kekerasan terhadap tubuh, pembatasan kebebasan bergerak, serta kelalaian yang berujung pada hilangnya nyawa. Melalui perpaduan antara riset hukum berbasis fenomena empiris dan analisis normatif-yuridis, kajian ini mengungkap bahwa pilihan metodologis hakim dalam menafsirkan unsur penguasaan yakni dengan meminjam kerangka analogi relasi pengasuhan berdampak pada pembatasan jangkauan makna perampasan kemerdekaan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 333 KUHP. Dalam hal penerapan Pasal 359 KUHP, pertimbangan hakim secara substantif dapat dibenarkan berdasarkan rangkaian sebab-akibat yang terbukti. Akan tetapi, konstruksi surat dakwaan yang bersifat alternatif subsidair telah mengakibatkan tindak kekerasan yang nyata-nyata terbukti terjadi luput dari pemidanaan yang sebanding. Sebagai tindak lanjut, kajian ini merekomendasikan agar penuntut umum menggunakan model dakwaan kumulatif pada perkara-perkara yang melibatkan concursus realis, serta mendorong penetapan tolak ukur kesepakatan yang lebih terukur dalam ranah hukum pidana.
Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Perubahan Harga Sepihak Dalam Transaksi Hotel di Platform Traveloka Rica Hardyanti; Otong Syuhada; Riky Pribadi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13033

Abstract

This study examines legal protection for consumers against unilateral price changes in hotel booking transactions conducted through the Traveloka digital platform and formulates a legal liability model between hotels and digital platforms. The research adopts a juridical-empirical (socio-legal) approach by combining normative analysis of the Consumer Protection Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Civil Code, and Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 on Electronic Commerce with field data obtained from interviews with consumers, hotel management, and platform representatives. The findings indicate that post-confirmation price changes violate consumer rights, the principle of good faith, and legal certainty, and constitute both breach of contract and unlawful acts. These practices are exacerbated by the absence of clear regulations defining the allocation of liability between hotels and digital platforms, resulting in a legal vacuum that weakens consumer protection. The novelty of this study lies in integrating a normative-empirical approach with global liability theories to develop a joint liability framework applicable to digital hotel transactions. This study recommends strengthening digital consumer protection through post-confirmation price-lock mechanisms, prohibition of unilateral clauses, and mandatory re-consent procedures to ensure fairness, transparency, and legal certainty in online hotel transactions.   Penelitian ini menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen terhadap praktik perubahan harga sepihak dalam transaksi pemesanan hotel melalui platform digital Traveloka serta merumuskan model tanggung jawab hukum antara hotel dan platform digital. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris (socio-legal research) dengan memadukan analisis normatif terhadap Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen, Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik, dengan data lapangan berupa wawancara konsumen, pihak hotel, dan penyedia platform. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perubahan harga setelah konfirmasi dan pembayaran merupakan pelanggaran terhadap hak konsumen, asas iktikad baik, dan kepastian hukum, serta dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai wanprestasi dan perbuatan melawan hukum. Praktik tersebut diperparah oleh ketiadaan pengaturan tegas mengenai pembagian tanggung jawab antara hotel dan platform digital, sehingga menciptakan kekosongan hukum dan melemahkan posisi konsumen. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi pendekatan normatif-empiris dengan teori tanggung jawab hukum global untuk merumuskan konsep joint liability antara hotel dan platform digital. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi perlindungan konsumen digital melalui penerapan price-lock pascakonfirmasi, larangan klausul sepihak, dan mekanisme re-consent guna menjamin kepastian hukum dan keadilan dalam transaksi hotel daring.