Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum & Keadilan JURNAL ABDIMAS TRIDHARMA MANAJEMEN Jurnal Lokabmas Kreatif : Loyalitas Kreatifitas Abdi Masyarakat Kreatif AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan
Bambang Wiyono
universitas pamulang
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Analisis Kausalitas dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korupsi Pasca Mutasi Jabatan: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 8681 K/Pid.Sus/2025 Muhamad Zainal Arifin; Bambang Wiyono; Muhammad Sa’dullah
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v6i1.1904

Abstract

This study examines criminal liability for corruption committed by public officials after job mutation, with particular attention to the application of causality theory in Supreme Court Decision Number 8681 K/Pid.Sus/2025. The legal issue arises from the temporal gap between administrative actions taken during the defendant’s tenure and the emergence of state losses after the official no longer held the relevant position. This situation raises questions regarding the limits of criminal responsibility and the existence of a legally relevant causal link. The research aims to analyze how the Supreme Court constructed criminal liability and applied causality theory in determining responsibility under such circumstances. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes legislation, judicial decisions, and doctrinal theories on criminal liability and causation. The findings show that the defendant’s administrative recommendation, issued lawfully during his tenure, did not have a direct and adequate causal relationship with the unlawful land sale conducted by third parties several years later. The emergence of an intervening cause and the loss of control after job mutation indicate a break in the chain of causation. This study concludes that the application of causality theory in corruption cases must be proportional and consistent with the principles of tempus delicti, individual criminal responsibility, and legal certainty.
Legal Protection of Endangered Wildlife in Indonesia: Analysis of Verdict No. 185/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bon under the Conservation Law bambang wiyono
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6348

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection of endangered wildlife in Indonesia through the enforcement of Law No. 5 of 1990 concerning the Conservation of Living Natural Resources and Their Ecosystems. The analysis focuses on Verdict No. 185/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Bon of the Bon District Court, which involved the illegal trade of protected wildlife species. The research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the legal framework in deterring wildlife crimes and assess the role of the judiciary in upholding conservation efforts. Using a normative juridical approach combined with case analysis, this paper highlights key legal considerations, including the interpretation of criminal liability, sentencing consistency, and the alignment of court decisions with conservation objectives. The findings reveal that although the legal provisions are comprehensive, enforcement challenges—such as light sentencing and limited deterrence—remain significant obstacles. The study concludes that stronger legal interpretation, enhanced coordination among law enforcement agencies, and public awareness are crucial for the effective protection of endangered species in Indonesia. This case serves as a reflection of the broader struggle between legal norms and the practical realities of wildlife conservation.
Co-Authors Agus Salim Bachtiar Bachtiar Bastianon Bastianon Defruzer Defruzer Dhoni Presti Wahyono Dyas Mulyani Benazir Eka Martiana Wulansari Endi Arofa Erick Cristian Fabrian Siagian Gregorius Hermawan K Gunawan Gunawan Irawan Saputro Keti Respati Meigi Meigi Muhamad Iqbal Muhamad Zainal Arifin Muhammad Iqbal Muhammad Sa’dullah Nova Susanti Oksidelfa Yanto Panduma Putra Pratama Purmanto Purmanto Rizal S. Gueci Susanto Susanto T. Muamar Kadafi Yoyon Mulyana Darusman