Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Model of History Education Laboratory Management Tarunasena Tarunasena; Ayi Budi Santosa; Iing Yulianti
FACTUM: Jurnal Sejarah dan Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Model-Model Pembelajaran Sejarah
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dan APPS (Asosiasi Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/factum.v9i1.21693

Abstract

The background of this research is based on the importance of forming professionalhistory teacher candidates in accordance with the above mentioned expectations,the Department of Historical Education needs to empower and develop the HistoryLaboratory as a superior program. The History Education Laboratory is centered onthe field of science, a place of authority and academic integrity. The HistoryEducation Laboratory was formed in order to meet the needs of the department andthe development of academics. The main limitation of this research problem is"what is the model of Management of Historical Education Laboratory in HigherEducation from the Organization and Administration aspects? Qualitative researchmethods are research procedures that produce descriptive data in the form ofwritten or oral words from and observable behavior. The objective of the researcherto use a qualitative approach is to look for a complex and holistic description of thesubject matter studied in this regard regarding the management model of theHistorical Education laboratory in tertiary institutions.
TEUNGKU MUHAMMAD DAUD BEUREUEH DAN REVOLUSI DI ACEH (1945-1950) Bambang Satriya; Andi Suwirta; Ayi Budi Santosa
FACTUM: Jurnal Sejarah dan Pendidikan Sejarah Vol 7, No 1 (2018): Sejarah Lokal dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dan APPS (Asosiasi Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/factum.v7i1.11925

Abstract

This research was distributed by attractions of authors to Teungku Muhammad Daud Beureueh the leader with big influence when the revolution happened in Aceh. The main issues studied in this research is “How was Teungku Muhammad Daud Beureueh’s role in defending the independence of Indonesian Republic in Aceh 1945-1950?”. This study uses historical method which includes four steps: 1) Heuristics, 2) Criticism, 3) Interpretation, 4) Historiography. Based on the result, the political and socio-economic conditions in Aceh after the independence of Indonesian Republic was unstable. The role of Teungku Muhammad Daud Beureueh in Peristiwa Cumbok gave the awareness to local government to give more attention in this horizontal conflict and he instructing to mobilize the troops to attack the uleebalang clan in Pidie. He also stopped the Tentara Perjuangan Rakyat (TPR) movement who headed by Husin Al Mujahid. As the Military Governor of Aceh, Langkat, and Tanah Karo, Teungku Muhammad Daud Beureueh can merged the paramilitary organizations into TNI organization, he also the inisiator who collected the cost to buy an airplane for Indonesian government, and he can stopped the Sayid Ali movement. Teungku Muhammad Daud Beureueh rejected the merging of Aceh into the Sumatera Utara Province and this case made his disappointed to the center government and also Soekarno.
OPIPA and the Decolonization of Scientific Governance in Indonesia, 1948–1956 Ayi Budi Santosa; Wildan Insan Fauzi; Dimas Aldi Pangestu
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): October
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v6i4.5135

Abstract

This article examines the role of the Organisasi Penjelidikan dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (OPIPA), which developed from the Dutch Organisatie voor Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (ONO), in the decolonization of scientific governance in Indonesia between 1948 and 1956. Histories of Indonesian science have generally regarded the Indonesian Council of Sciences (Majelis Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, MIPI) as a major milestone in the consolidation of national science, while OPIPA’s role in this transformation has received less attention. Using a historical approach, this study draws on State Secretariat archives and ONO/OPIPA records, including government decisions, organizational records, conference resolutions, correspondence, publications, and documents on international scientific relations. The findings show that OPIPA retained several coordinating practices from the colonial period while adapting them to the needs of the Indonesian state. OPIPA coordinated research, collected information on scientific personnel, supported technical training, and maintained Indonesia’s connections with international scientific network. Yet the Indonesianization of institutional leadership advanced more rapidly than the development of national scientific capacity. OPIPA remained constrained by limited authority, shortages of expertise, financial limitations, and its disciplinary scope. These experiences contributed to debates over a broader framework for scientific governance and the establishment of MIPI in 1956. The article argues that Indonesian scientific institutions changed gradually after independence. Existing networks and practices were retained where they remained useful, but were increasingly placed under Indonesian authority.