Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Reconstruction of Agrarian Reform Policy Based on Presidential Regulation No. 62 of 2023: A Juridical Study on State Responsibility in Guaranteeing Citizens’ Constitutional Rights to Land Pangesti, Shinta; Nugiantari, Ayu Rosita; Permadi, Bagus; Vanny, Vanny
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v5i2.2204

Abstract

Land inequality remains a persistent issue in Indonesia, often leading to agrarian conflicts and limiting access for marginalized groups. Presidential Regulation No. 62 of 2023 was introduced to strengthen agrarian reform and uphold citizens’ constitutional rights to land. This study aims to examines Presidential Regulation No. 62 of 2023 as a key policy aimed at addressing inequality in land ownership in Indonesia, with a focus on how this regulation facilitates agrarian reform and resolves agrarian conflicts. The objective of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy in distributing land to marginalized communities and ensuring citizens’ constitutional rights to land. The method employed is a normative juridical approach, using library research as the technique for collecting legal materials. Data were gathered from primary sources, such as the regulation itself, and secondary sources, including books, journals, and previous studies on agrarian reform. The findings indicate that although this policy has the potential to reduce land inequality, its implementation faces significant challenges due to bureaucratic obstacles, political influence, and resistance from large landowners. This study concludes that the success of implementation largely depends on government commitment, effective oversight, and community involvement to ensure equitable land distribution and the resolution of agrarian conflicts.
Perspektif hukum agraria terhadap perlindungan para pihak dalam kontrak pembangunan pipa gas bawah tanah Pangesti, Shinta; Girsang, Fredsly Hendra Sardol; Widyanti, Khairina; Syari, Shinta Kumala
Widya Bhumi Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Widya Bhumi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/wb.v6i1.287

Abstract

The construction of underground gas pipelines across privately owned land may create legal uncertainty, restrict land use, and trigger compensation disputes when it relies solely on right-of-way agreements without clear minimum standards. This study formulates minimum contractual clauses for right-of-way agreements to protect land-right holders within Indonesia’s agrarian-law framework. Using a normative-juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research examines primary legal materials consisting of the Basic Agrarian Law, the Land Acquisition Law, Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021, Government Regulation Number 19 of 2021, Minister of ATR/BPN Regulation Number 19 of 2021, and Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation Number 32 of 2021, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of books, journal articles, and references on right-of-way and easement practices. These materials were obtained through library research and document review and analyzed prescriptively. The findings show that minimum clauses should regulate parties’ authority, corridor identification, access scope, land-use restrictions, duration, compensation, liability, restoration, supervision, and dispute resolution. These standards strengthen legal certainty, reduce conflict, and balance private land rights with energy infrastructure needs. Pembangunan pipa gas bawah tanah yang melintasi tanah milik perseorangan dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, membatasi pemanfaatan tanah, dan memicu sengketa kompensasi apabila hanya didasarkan pada perjanjian hak lintas tanpa standar minimum yang jelas. Penelitian ini merumuskan klausul minimum kontrak hak lintas untuk melindungi pemegang hak atas tanah dalam kerangka hukum agraria Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, penelitian ini mengkaji bahan hukum primer yang terdiri atas Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Undang-Undang Pengadaan Tanah, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2021, Peraturan Menteri ATR/BPN Nomor 19 Tahun 2021, dan Peraturan Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Nomor 32 Tahun 2021, serta bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku, artikel jurnal, dan referensi mengenai praktik hak lintas dan easement. Bahan-bahan tersebut diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan penelaahan dokumen, lalu dianalisis secara preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa klausul minimum harus mengatur kewenangan para pihak, identifikasi koridor, ruang lingkup akses, pembatasan penggunaan tanah, jangka waktu, kompensasi, tanggung jawab, pemulihan tanah, pengawasan, dan penyelesaian sengketa. Standar ini memperkuat kepastian hukum, mengurangi konflik, dan menyeimbangkan hak atas tanah dengan kebutuhan infrastruktur energi.
Dualisme Kedudukan Hak Guna Usaha: Perspektif Keterbukaan Informasi Publik dan Kontrak Bisnis Shinta Pangesti; Prisca Octavia Rumokoy; Nonita Sabillah Fahzari; I Dewa Wirantaya; Selin Dinda Hariyanti
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 4: Juni 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i4.16700

Abstract

The Dualism of the Legal Status of Land Cultivation Rights: The Principle of Public Information Disclosure and Business Contracts. This study aims to analyze the Supreme Court’s decision in the Judicial Review (PK) ruling Number 61 PK/TUN/KI/2020 concerning the dispute over information on Land Cultivation Rights (Hak Guna Usaha/HGU) between Forest Watch Indonesia and the Information and Documentation Management Officer (PPID) of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN). The main focus of this research is to examine HGU from the perspectives of agrarian law and contract law. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a qualitative analytical approach. The statute approach and case approach are employed to examine the Supreme Court decision and the legal norms that form the basis of law in Indonesia. A dualism arises between business actors and the public: business actors view HGU as private, while the public perceives it as public. The results of the study indicate that Forest Watch Indonesia was not at fault in requesting information from the Ministry of ATR/BPN, and the Ministry itself cannot be held entirely at fault either. Reconstruction is therefore necessary to prevent conflict dualism.