Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing

Sentiment Analysis on Cyanide Case After 'Ice Cold' Aired with NLP Method using Naïve Bayes Algorithm Rahmatika Hizria; Sarwadi Sarwadi; Rabiatul Adawiyah Hasibuan; Ramadhani Ritonga; Rika Rosnelly
Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Article Research Volume 6 Issue 1, January 2024
Publisher : Information Technology and Science (ITScience)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/cnahpc.v6i1.3408

Abstract

Information technology is developing increasingly rapidly, and the reach of the Internet has expanded even to remote areas. The public increasingly uses social media as a source of information that discusses all aspects of people's lives. Social media has a vital role for most people, one of which is the news of the cyanide coffee case. The Cyanide Coffee case was discussed again by netizens after Netflix raised this case in a documentary film entitled Ice Cold, which made the public even more convinced of the irregularities of the case. Based on this, sentiment analysis is needed to extract comments to obtain public opinion information. The sentiment analysis aims to create a sentiment model to determine public comments on this case. Therefore, this research was conducted to find out and classify public sentiment on the Cyanide Coffee Case using the Natural Language Processing (NLP) method, which is a text preprocessing process followed by the tokenization stage. Data filtering was used using Indonesian Stopwords, and then normalization was continued using Porter Stemmer. In this study, data collection was carried out based on public comments on Ice Cold shows on the TikTok platform using TikTok Comments Scraper. The test results show that the classification using naïve Bayes obtained the results of 22 negative comments, 4052 neutral comments and 34 positive comments. The classification results of this study are 87% accuracy, 97.6% precision, 87% recall, and 91.9% F-Score.
Co-Authors Abwabul Jinan Aditia Rangga Agus Fahmi Akbar Idaman Alan Prayogi Alesia Lorenza Sinaga Alvinur Naswar Alvinur Naswar Ameliana Sihotang Anton Purnama Arselan Ashraf B. Herawan Hayadi Batubara, Muhammad Akbarri Bob Subhan Riza Cindy Paramitha Cindy Paramitha Dedi Irawan Dedi Irawan Della Syahrani Desi Irfan Dian Maya Sari Diky Wahyudi Edy Victor Haryanto, Edy Victor Eko Setyo Budi Putra Aji Elly Veronika Sihite Elsa Aditya Eri Triwanda Esmawaty Sinaga Finis Hermanto Laia Gusti Firanda Hardianto Hardianto Hardianto Hardianto Hartono Hartono Hetty Zahrani IQBAL GIFFARI RITONGA Jaka Kusuma Jaka Tirta Samudra Jazmi Hadi Matondang Junaidi Junaidi Karuniaman Buulolo Kristine Wau Linda Wahyuni Linda Wahyuni Linda Wahyuni Lubis, Cindy Paramitha M. Agung Oki Prayugo Maradona Jonas Simanullang MARIA BINTANG Masri Wahyuni Mega Christin Lase Mega Christin Morys Lase Mega Marisani Ziraluo Mimi Chintya Adelina Mira Kartiwi Muhammad Fachrurrozi Nasution Muhammad Sadikin Muhammad Zulkarnain Lubis Mutiara S. Simanjuntak Pius Deski Manalu Progresif Bulolo Progresif Bulolo5 Puji Sari Ramadhan Rabiatul Adawiyah Hasibuan Rahmatika Hizria Rais Affaruq Zunnurain Ramadhani Ritonga Ridha Maya Faza Lubis Rofiqoh Dewi Rohima, Rohima Rony, Zahara Tussoleha Roslina, Roslina Rubianto Rubianto Rubianto Sartika Mandasari Sarwadi Sarwadi Sarwadi, Sarwadi Syawaluddin Kadafi Parinduri Teddy Gunawan Teddy Surya Gunawan Teddy Surya Gunawan Teresa Tamba Tri Andre Anu Tri Andre Anu Triandi, Budi Ubaidullah Hasibuan Wahyuni, Linda Wanayumini Wulandari, Wulandari Yuni Franciska Zakarias Situmorang Zuriati Janin