Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PUBLIC HEARING SEBAGAI RUANG (SARANA) PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN PERATURAN DAERAH YANG DEMOKRATIS (Studi Penyusunan Raperda Kota Salatiga Tentang Penyelenggaraan Tertib Tuna Sosial) Alfret; Rauta, Umbu; Setyorini, Heny
Magistrorum et Scholarium: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24246/jms.v4i32024p278-288

Public hearing is one of the instruments for Local People's Representative Council (DPRD) of Salatiga City to absorb people's aspirations in the formation of local regulations. Networking and absorbing the aspirations of the community is important in the process of forming local regulations so they can answer the needs and solve the problems, because sociologically, local regulations must prioritize usability and usefulness. This Public Hearing was held in order to absorb the aspirations of the community regarding the Draft Regional Regulation on the Implementation of Social Order. The activity began with the presentation of the substance of the Draft Regional Regulation then continued with a direct question and answer session, also can access by Youtube even for those who have not had the opportunity to submit questions and suggestions can access the google form link that has been provided. This activity provide benefit where the DPRD as the people's representative can absorb the aspirations of the community as a whole.

ANALISIS PENGATURAN SUBSTANSI KEWENANGAN ISTIMEWA DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH ISTIMEWA DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA Maheswara, Giovanni Battista; Rauta, Umbu; Margaretha, Lagasakti Parwati
Justitia et Pax Vol. 40 No. 1 (2024): Justitia et Pax Volume 40 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v40i1.7879

The Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the provinces in Indonesia that has a privileged status so that it has a certain authority in running its government. This authority is affirmed in Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2012 concerning the Privileges of the Special Region of Yogyakarta which includes matters such as procedures for filling out the positions, positions, duties, and authorities of the Governor and Deputy Governor; DIY Regional Government Institutions; Culture; Land; and Layout. These five powers are then directly implemented into the Special Regional Regulation. The problem of this research is how is the substance of the Special Authority of DIY which is regulated by the Perdais? And whether of the 5 kinds of special authority mentioned in Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2012 concerning the Privileges of the Special Region of Yogyakarta there are only 5 Special Regional Regulation or can it be reduced to more than 5 Special Regional Regulation?. The research method that will be carried out is a normative study, namely research that focuses on positive legal norms and laws and regulations. The approach method used is the history of law; sociology of law and legal politics.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Setengah-Hati: Final tetapi Tidak Mengikat dalam Kewenangan Pengujian Konstitusional Kishan, Marcelino Ceasar; Rauta, Umbu; Alves de Sousa, Freidelino Paixao Ramos
Widya Yuridika Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/wy.v7i1.4678

This article aims to discuss the bindingness of constitutional review decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI). In particular, this article looks at the relevance between the grand design of the nature of the MKRI decision in Article 24C paragraph (1) The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) with the practice of constitution disobedience. Based on that issue, this article argues that the MKRI is designed not to have a final and binding decision, but only final decisions. Because based on the Supremacy-of-Text Principle which is coherent with the concept of applying law based on regulations in the Rule of Law, the non-appreance of binding phrases in Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 UUD NRI 1945 makes the decision of the Constitutional Court in the authority of constitutional review has no binding legal force. Grammatical argumentation comes from interpretation with original meaning and textualism methods which find that the word final does not mean binding due the two words stand separately. By drawing on the concepts of strong-form judicial review and weak-form judicial review, the non-binding nature of MKRI decisions can legitimize the disagreement. Because the indecisivenesss of the Constitution establish a half-hearted form of MKRI, namely the partial weak-form judicial review. Thus, the form of MKRI is a strong and weak-form judicial review that makes MKRI decisions can be opposed. This article uses normative research methods with conceptual approach, statutory approach, and comparative approach.

PENGATURAN PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG: PRESIDENTIAL REGULATION OR ACT? Sri Agung Baskoro; Umbu Rauta; Theofransus Litaay
Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2024.v9.i1.p21-40

This article aims to discuss the issue of the appropriate form of legal product for regulating government procurement of goods/services. The existing legal product is the Presidential Regulation, in this case, Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018. Considering the material content covered by the Presidential Regulation, this article proposes that regulating government procurement of goods/services should be an Act because there is no explicit delegation from the Act that orders government procurement of goods/services to be regulated by Presidential Regulation. Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 uses an implicit delegation technique that is strengthened by the function of the Presidential Regulation as a legal instrument in exercising the executive power of the President, according to Act Number 12 of 2011. Such an approach is inappropriate because implicit delegation is not law. Furthermore, the Presidential Regulation also contains material content in the form of sanctions. Therefore, the ideal form of legal product for regulating government procurement of goods/services is an Act.

Kekuasaan Presiden Dalam Pembentukan Kabinet Menurut Sistem Presidensial Kelmaskosu, Krisyando; Rauta, Umbu
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i1.11739

This study aims to discuss the president's power in forming a cabinet in connection with the amendment to Law No. 39 of 2008 concerning State Ministries (Ministry Law). One of the main changes to the law is Article 15 concerning the total number of ministries, which was originally limited to a maximum of 34 ministries, changed according to the needs of the administration of government by the President. The norm does not explicitly regulate the total number of ministries. This is indeed compatible or in line with the presidential system of government firmly adopted by Indonesia after the constitutional amendment in 2002. The problems arising from the change in the norm are related to the implications of increasing the number of ministries which are related to governance. The change in this article refers to legalistic, not prerogatives because if it is prerogative, the number of ministries does not need to be regulated in the law. The formation of the cabinet is one of the powers held by the President in a presidential system of government. The research method uses normative legal research with a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a statutory approach. The results of the study indicate that the changes in the norms in the Ministry Law are in accordance with the presidential system of government. However, the president's discretion in forming a cabinet must take into account the professionalism, integrity, and track record of ministerial candidates so as not to merely accommodate short-term political interests. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas tentang kekuasaan presiden dalam pembentukan kabinet. sehubungan dengan adanya perubahan Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 2008 tentang Kementerian Negara (UU Kementerian). Salah satu pokok perubahan pada undang-undang tersebut yaitu Pasal 15 terkait jumlah keseluruhan kementerian, yang semula dibatasi paling banyak 34 kementerian berubah menjadi sesuai kebutuhan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan oleh Presiden. Dalam norma tersebut tidak diatur secara eksplisit mengenai jumlah keseluruhan kementerian. Hal itu memang kompatibel atau sejalan dengan sistem pemerintahan presidensial yang dianut secara tegas oleh Indonesia pasca amandemen konstitusi tahun 2002. Permasalahan yang timbul dari perubahan norma tersebut terkait implikasi pada penambahan jumlah kementerian yang mana berhubungan dengan tata kelola pemerintahan. Perubahan pasal ini mengacu pada legalistik bukan prerogatif sebab jika prerogatif jumlah kementerian tidak perlu diatur dalam UU. Pembentukan kabinet tersebut merupakan salah satu kekuasaan yang dimiliki oleh Presiden dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensial. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perubahan norma pada UU Kementerian sudah sesuai dengan sistem pemerintahan presidensial. Namun, keleluasaan presiden dalam pembentukan kabinet harus mempertimbangkan profesionalisme, integritas dan track record calon menteri sehingga tidak sekedar mengakomodasi kepentingan politik jangka pendek.

ANALISIS PENGATURAN SUBSTANSI KEWENANGAN ISTIMEWA DALAM PERATURAN DAERAH ISTIMEWA DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA Maheswara, Giovanni Battista; Rauta, Umbu; Margaretha, Lagasakti Parwati
Justitia et Pax Vol. 40 No. 1 (2024): Justitia et Pax Volume 40 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v40i1.7879

The Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the provinces in Indonesia that has a privileged status so that it has a certain authority in running its government. This authority is affirmed in Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2012 concerning the Privileges of the Special Region of Yogyakarta which includes matters such as procedures for filling out the positions, positions, duties, and authorities of the Governor and Deputy Governor; DIY Regional Government Institutions; Culture; Land; and Layout. These five powers are then directly implemented into the Special Regional Regulation. The problem of this research is how is the substance of the Special Authority of DIY which is regulated by the Perdais? And whether of the 5 kinds of special authority mentioned in Article 7 paragraph (2) of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 13 of 2012 concerning the Privileges of the Special Region of Yogyakarta there are only 5 Special Regional Regulation or can it be reduced to more than 5 Special Regional Regulation?. The research method that will be carried out is a normative study, namely research that focuses on positive legal norms and laws and regulations. The approach method used is the history of law; sociology of law and legal politics.

Kewenangan Inheren Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Perkara Pengaduan Konstitutional dengan Objek Putusan Pengadilan Aruan, Bagas Christofel; Rauta, Umbu
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): January-June 2022
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v2i1.27828

The authority of the Constitutional Court is often limited only to the judicial review of statutory products, not practice. The method used for this research is normative legal research using a conceptual approach, legislation, and comparisons. This legal research aims to examine the implementation of constitutional complaint schemes in various countries while reviewing the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court in reviewing constitutional complaint cases with the object of court decisions. The results show that the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea has many similarities with the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia; at the same time, the German Constitutional Court gives rights to individuals, communions, and associations to file a constitutional complaint and the United States Supreme Court establishes several criteria for legal standing for parties who make constitutional complaints. Then, the Constitutional Court has the authority to decide on constitutional objections, including court decisions, considering the court's decision is analogous to the law itself. Furthermore, based on constitutionalism, the constitutional complaint is the inherent authority of the Constitutional Court. KEYWORDS: Constitutional Court, Constitutional Complaint, Court Rulings, Inherent Power.

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 17 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search