Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

Inequality Between Parties In The Industrial Relations Court: Reconstructing Equality of Arms Between Workers and Employers Muhamad Abas; Deny Guntara
Jurnal Hukum Replik Vol 14 No 02 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Replik
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/zb85qj65

Abstract

Inequality between workers and employers in the settlement of industrial relations disputes stems not only from disparities in economic power but may also arise from procedural rules that formally treat both parties equally while overlooking their differing practical capacities to access judicial forums, manage procedural time constraints, navigate procedural stages, and produce evidence. This study aims to examine the forms of procedural inequality between workers and employers before the Industrial Relations Court and to reconstruct the principle of equality of arms as a normative basis for reforming the procedural law governing industrial relations dispute resolution in Indonesia. This study employs a normative-doctrinal legal research method using statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The analysis focuses on Law No. 2 of 2004 and several Constitutional Court decisions issued in 2025–2026 concerning relative jurisdiction, time limits for filing claims, and mediation procedures. The findings demonstrate that formal equality does not necessarily result in genuine procedural equality. Procedural inequality manifests in four principal dimensions: access to judicial forums, procedural time arrangements, procedural stages, and evidentiary processes. Accordingly, the principle of equality of arms should not be confined to evidentiary matters but should serve as a comprehensive framework for designing the procedural law of the Industrial Relations Court. The novelty of this study lies in the concept of substantive equality of arms, comprising access equality, temporal equality, procedural equality, and evidentiary equality. This framework is intended to ensure that workers and employers are afforded a reasonable and effective opportunity to assert and defend their rights without placing either party at a substantial procedural disadvantage. Reform of Industrial Relations Court procedure should therefore move beyond formal equality toward substantive procedural equality while preserving legal certainty, judicial impartiality, and a fair balance between the interests of the parties. Keywords Industrial Relations Court; equality of arms; procedural justice; workers; employers; access to justice
Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Debt Collector dalam Penarikan Paksa Kendaraan Bermotor sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia Fuad Hasan; Deny Guntara
Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jhi.v5i4.2997

Abstract

Pengambilalihan kendaraan bermotor yang menjadi objek jaminan fidusia oleh debt collector hingga kini kerap memunculkan masalah hukum, terutama bila dijalankan dengan paksaan dan mengabaikan tata cara yang digariskan peraturan perundang-undangan. Perbuatan semacam itu bukan hanya melahirkan sengketa perdata, tetapi juga dapat menyeret pelakunya ke ranah pidana ketika diiringi ancaman, intimidasi, kekerasan, ataupun perbuatan melanggar hukum yang lain. Studi ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaji aturan hukum yang melandasi penarikan kendaraan bermotor objek jaminan fidusia oleh debt collector di Indonesia sekaligus menelaah pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi debt collector yang menarik kendaraan tersebut secara paksa. Metode yang dipakai ialah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif-analitis, melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), serta pendekatan kasus (case approach). Bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier dihimpun lewat studi kepustakaan, lalu dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan penafsiran dan argumentasi hukum. Temuan penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa tata cara eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia dan dikuatkan oleh Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 serta Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021. Eksekusi langsung baru dapat ditempuh jika debitur mengakui cidera janji dan menyerahkan objek jaminan dengan sukarela. Debt collector tidak berwenang menarik kendaraan secara paksa di luar jalur hukum yang sah. Bila penarikan dilakukan dengan ancaman, kekerasan, atau pemaksaan yang memenuhi unsur delik, debt collector dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Penyalahguna Narkotika Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak (Studi Di BNN Kabupaten Karawang) Rahel Riviena Putri Utami Sitohang; Deny Guntara; Muhamad Abas; Raka Indra Pratama
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v11i1.5234

Abstract

This study aims to examine the regulation and implementation of legal protection for children involved in drug abuse based on Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, conducted at the Karawang Regency National Narcotics Agency (BNN). The method used is normative juridical through analysis of laws and regulations, supported by literature studies and field data in the form of interviews. The results indicate that legal provisions position children as subjects whose rights must be guaranteed, including assistance, identity confidentiality, and physical, mental, and social recovery. Field implementation prioritizes a humanistic approach, emphasizing recovery over punishment, although criminal proceedings are still possible depending on the level of involvement. In practice, treatment is more directed at rehabilitation for users, while dealers can be subject to sanctions with special treatment. Obstacles encountered include limited detention time, suboptimal assessments, inter-agency coordination, minimal family support, and inadequate rehabilitation facilities. Therefore, synergy is needed between law enforcement officials, families, and community to achieve effective and sustainable protection for children.
Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Hukum Fungsi Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perjanjian Kredit Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia Anindya Arumdani; Deny Guntara; Muhamad Abas
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 4 (2026): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i4.4773

Abstract

With the existence of Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, when there is a credit agreement for fiduciary guarantees, the fiduciary guarantee must be registered online on the AHU online site by authorized officials. The uncertainty and ineffectiveness of the implementation of fiduciary guarantees in the practice of credit agreements, there are fiduciary guarantees which in practice the relevant party has not or does not register the fiduciary after the agreement agreement, then it cannot be unilaterally controlled or transferred the object of the guarantee and if the creditor has registered the fiduciary guarantee, there will be legal certainty for the parties. because of this, this paper aims to analyze the position of the Fiduciary guarantee function in credit agreements for legal certainty for creditors and debtors and to find out the legal consequences that occur if the Fiduciary guarantee credit agreement is not registered in accordance with the provisions of Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. The method used in this study is normative juridical legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach. Fiduciary Guarantees are a complement to the core agreement or credit agreement and become legal protection for both parties, both creditors and debtors.
Utilization Of Electronic Technology in Ptsl Program in Karawang Regency And Its Implications On Issuance Of Electronic Documents in Land Registration Activities Based On Permen No. 3 Year 2023 Fitria Aidina; Deny Guntara; Muhamad Abas
DE LEGA LATA: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 10, No 2 (2025): July-December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/dll.v10i2.24336

Abstract

The Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) is a government strategy to provide legal certainty over land asset ownership in order to create social and economic stability in society. This legal certainty not only increases the economic value of land assets but also strengthens social harmony by minimizing the potential for agrarian conflicts. The implementation of PTSL encourages public legal awareness, creates a healthier legal environment, and facilitates transparent and legitimate land transactions. The use of technology in the implementation of PTSL however has a gap between theory and practice. This study aims to understand the use of electronic technology in the Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) in Karawang Regency and the implications of the implementation of the Minister of ATR/BPN Regulation No. 3 of 2023 on the process of issuing electronic documents in land registration in the region. The research methodology uses qualitative analysis using an empirical legal approach, namely solving problems by examining secondary data and primary data in the field. The results of the study, in Karawang, PTSL accelerates the land legalization process and increases community participation in data collection. Collaboration between the community, technological support, and the active role of government officials are the main keys to the success of PTSL. This program is a real model of synergy between the state and society in realizing inclusive and sustainable agrarian legal certainty.