Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

2.585

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal CALYPTRA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Veritas et Justitia PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Hukum tora: Hukum mengatur dan melindungi masyarakat Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan Indonesian Journal of International Law Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Hang Tuah Law Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Equalegum International Law Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada)

Wisnu Aryo Dewanto

Unknown Affiliation

Author-ID : 252152

Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

Title

CLASS ACTION AGAINST THE NON-IMMEDIACY OF RATIFICATION OF THE 1990 MIGRANT WORKERS CONVENTION Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 25, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Ratification of treaties in Indonesia can be regarded as mere political acts, as ratification itself does not yet rule for its enforcement in Indonesia’s jurisdiction. As stipulated in Article 11 of the 1945Indonesian Constitution, these ratifications are still subject to consent from the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) as they are the appointed institution in Indonesia with treaty-making powers. The act of ratification by the Indonesian Government is regarded as a ratification only in the international sense, where such action would only make the treaty enter into force internationally, but not internally within Indonesia. This paper seeks to analyze the legal implications which signatureand ratification of international treaties may hold in the Indonesian government. Such is done by studying the class action lawsuit for Indonesia being signatories the Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Member of Their Families and its failure continue to further ratify the Convention. Ratifikasi perjanjian internasional merupakan tindakan politik yang memerlukan persetujuan dari Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) sebagai lembaga dengan treaty-making power sebagaimana yangdiatur oleh Pasal 11 UUD 1945. Tindakan ratifikasi oleh Pemerintah Indonesia hanya bermakna sebagairatification hanya dalam the international sense, yakni membuat perjanjian tersebut berlaku di levelinternasional, bukan berlaku di wilayah hukum Republik Indonesia. Artikel ini menganalisis proses andimplikasi hukum diratifikasinya dan ditandatanganinya suatu perjanjian internasional oleh PemerintahIndonesia dengan menelaah gugatan class action yang dilakukan terhadap Pemerintah Indonesia mengenaibelum diratifikasinya Konvensi Buruh Migran.

IMPLEMENTING TREATIES IN MUNICIPAL COURTS Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 23, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

In regard to the implementation of treaties in municipal courts, treaty is divided into self-executing and non-self-executing. A self-executing treaty is defined as a treaty that its implementation does not need an implementing legislation. However, a nonself- executing treaty needs an implementing legislation to have it enforced in national courts.Terkait dengan implementasinya di pengadilan nasional suatu negara, perjanjian internasional digolongkan menjadi perjanjian internasional self-executing dan non-self-executing. Perjanjian internasional self-executing adalah perjanjian internasional yang dapat diimplementasikan secara langsung di pengadilan tanpa implementing legislation, dan perjanjian non-self-executing adalah perjanjian internasional yang tidak dapat langsung dimplementasikan di pengadilan tanpa adanya implementing legislation.

Status Hukum Internasional dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 21, No 2 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

A rule of international law is regarded as non-self-executing in the Indonesian legal system. It means the international legal norm does not have legal binding force in the domestic courts of Indonesia without an implementing legislation. Indonesia is a dualist country vis-à-vis the relation of international law and national law. In regard with the implementation of rules of international law into the Indonesian courts, Indonesia follows the transformation theory where the rules of international law must be transposed into national laws to have them enforced. Therefore, it is the supremacy of national law over international law before the domestic courts.

Co-Authors ANDRI WAHYUDI, ANDRI Asdiana, Femmy Chomariyah, Chomariyah Chomariyah, Chomariyah Gozal, Kenxie Handiwiyanto, Billy Harsono, Wiyono Kent Kurniawan Handi Krustiyati, J. M. Atik Lingga Parama Liofa Maria Hana Angelita Muhammad Insan Tarigan Nathania Shella Iskandar Pattynama, Francis Maryanne Priyanto, Hengky Budi Siswanto, Ovina Viviani Bambang Suhariwanto Sujono Suk, Hyun-Tae Winata, Oey Valentino Young, James Tirtowijoyo

Title Search

Found 3 Documents Search Journal : Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada