Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.177
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal CALYPTRA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Veritas et Justitia PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Hukum tora: Hukum mengatur dan melindungi masyarakat Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesian Journal of International Law Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Hang Tuah Law Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Equalegum International Law Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada)
Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Veritas et Justitia

 1 
AKIBAT HUKUM PERATIFIKASIAN PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA: STUDI KASUS KONVENSI PALERMO 2000 Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo
Veritas et Justitia Vol 1, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Chatolic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractRatification in Indonesia does not have any legal consequences for the application of the treaties at national level.  The reason is that ratification only binds Indonesia as a subject of international law. In comparison, parliamentary approval in the Indonesian context is not the same as the United States Senate’s approval. The Indonesian Government signed the Palermo Convention on December 12, 2000 and ratified it on April 20, 2009. The issue discussed here regards the legal status of this Convention.  In the 80’s it was assumed that any treaties ratified or acceded, would ipso facto be enforceable in Indonesia. I argued that Indonesia should be regarded as a state applying the monist approach, which legal practice seems to reject.  I stand for the monist approach especially with regard to the legal status of the 2000 Palermo Convention. In addition I also argue about the importance of differentiating between Indonesia’s international obligations and the issue of direct applicaton of the Convention by national couts. Keywords: Ratification, Integration, Implementation, Treaty, Indonesia’s legal system
AKIBAT HUKUM PERATIFIKASIAN PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA: STUDI KASUS KONVENSI PALERMO 2000 Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v1i1.1416

Abstract

AbstractRatification in Indonesia does not have any legal consequences for the application of the treaties at national level.  The reason is that ratification only binds Indonesia as a subject of international law. In comparison, parliamentary approval in the Indonesian context is not the same as the United States Senate’s approval. The Indonesian Government signed the Palermo Convention on December 12, 2000 and ratified it on April 20, 2009. The issue discussed here regards the legal status of this Convention.  In the 80’s it was assumed that any treaties ratified or acceded, would ipso facto be enforceable in Indonesia. I argued that Indonesia should be regarded as a state applying the monist approach, which legal practice seems to reject.  I stand for the monist approach especially with regard to the legal status of the 2000 Palermo Convention. In addition I also argue about the importance of differentiating between Indonesia’s international obligations and the issue of direct applicaton of the Convention by national couts. Keywords: Ratification, Integration, Implementation, Treaty, Indonesia’s legal system
AKIBAT HUKUM PERATIFIKASIAN PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA: STUDI KASUS KONVENSI PALERMO 2000 Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v1i1.1416

Abstract

AbstractRatification in Indonesia does not have any legal consequences for the application of the treaties at national level.  The reason is that ratification only binds Indonesia as a subject of international law. In comparison, parliamentary approval in the Indonesian context is not the same as the United States Senate’s approval. The Indonesian Government signed the Palermo Convention on December 12, 2000 and ratified it on April 20, 2009. The issue discussed here regards the legal status of this Convention.  In the 80’s it was assumed that any treaties ratified or acceded, would ipso facto be enforceable in Indonesia. I argued that Indonesia should be regarded as a state applying the monist approach, which legal practice seems to reject.  I stand for the monist approach especially with regard to the legal status of the 2000 Palermo Convention. In addition I also argue about the importance of differentiating between Indonesia’s international obligations and the issue of direct applicaton of the Convention by national couts. Keywords: Ratification, Integration, Implementation, Treaty, Indonesia’s legal system
Co-Authors Affandi, Verdinandus Kiki ANDRI WAHYUDI, ANDRI Asdiana, Femmy Chomariyah, Chomariyah Chomariyah, Chomariyah Gozal, Kenxie Handiwiyanto, Billy Harsono, Wiyono Kent Kurniawan Handi Kezia Grace Harefa Krustiyati, J. M. Atik Lingga Parama Liofa Maria Hana Angelita Muhammad Insan Tarigan Nathania Shella Iskandar Pattynama, Francis Maryanne Priyanto, Hengky Budi Siswanto, Ovina Viviani Bambang Suhariwanto Sujono Suk, Hyun-Tae Winata, Oey Valentino Young, James Tirtowijoyo