Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.35
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal CALYPTRA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Veritas et Justitia PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Hukum tora: Hukum mengatur dan melindungi masyarakat Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan Indonesian Journal of International Law Hang Tuah Law Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Equalegum International Law Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada)
Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAKAN SEPIHAK PENGUBAHAN THRESHOLD DEVELOPMENT TAXONOMY NEGARA BERKEMBANG ANGGOTA WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION OLEH UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE Kent Kurniawan Handi; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
to-ra Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33541/JtVol5Iss2pp102

Abstract

In its efforts to protect the national economy the power of a country is not unlimited. The state, as the holder of sovereignty, must comply with the provisions of international law. As a WTO member who also ratified the GATT, Enabling Clause, Marrakesh Agreement, and Doha Declaration, United States of America should have complied with, and implemented with full commitment, all the provisions governed in these agreements. On the basis of the order issued by President Donald Trump through a memo dated July 26, 2019, on February 10, 2020 USTR announced a new development taxonomy threshold that caused Indonesia and 22 other WTO member countries with Gross National Income per capita less than US $ 12,375.-, the threshold of the World Bank's high-income countries, to involuntarily lose their status as developing countries, which resulted in these countries being deprived access to WTO’s special and differential treatment provisions. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a juridical analysis on the unilateral action taken by USTR to alter the development taxonomy threshold of WTO’s developing country members examined from the concept of "graduation" and the various provisions stipulated in WTO agreements. Seen from the concept of "graduation" development taxonomy designed by USTR contains various weaknesses and was not based on transparent and data-driven methodology, this has caused some WTO developing country members to lose their status prematurely. This unilateral action taken by the USTR also contradicted various provisions stipulated in the GATT, Enabling Clause, Marrakesh Agreement, and Doha Declaration, and was not in accordance with the WTO's noble goal of advancing the economies of developing countries.
State Responsibility for Environmental Damage from Climate Change under the No-Harm Principle Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo; Krustiyati, J. M. Atik
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v8i1.200

Abstract

This research delves into the critical role of states in addressing environmental damage stemming from climate change, underpinned by the fundamental principle of “no harm”. Climate change represents a profound threat to both the global ecosystem and human welfare, necessitating concerted action from all nations. The no harm principle places an obligation on states to undertake effective measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, facilitate adaptation to climate change impacts, and mitigate adverse effects on vulnerable communities. This research uses normative legal research methods with a regulatory and contextual approach. By examining both theoretical frameworks and legal instruments, the study aims to elucidate the responsibilities of states and the mechanisms through which they can fulfill these obligations. A central focus of this research is the examination of how nations collaborate internationally to achieve climate change mitigation and adaptation goals through global agreements. These agreements serve as frameworks for collective action, guiding states in their efforts to combat climate change and minimize its harmful effects. By emphasizing the no harm principle, this study seeks to deepen our understanding of state responsibility for climate change and associated environmental damage. It underscores the imperative for robust collaborative endeavors aimed at safeguarding the global environment and ensuring a sustainable future for all. Through enhanced awareness and collective action, states can fulfill their duty to protect the planet and mitigate the adverse impacts of climate change on present and future generations.
PRINSIP INVIOLABILITY DAN EKSTRATERITORIAL DALAM PENEROBOSAN GEDUNG KONSULAT RUSIA OLEH AMERIKA SERIKAT Nathania Shella Iskandar; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto; Suhariwanto
CALYPTRA Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Calyptra : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya (Mei)
Publisher : Perpustakaan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract—consular relations as one of the foreign relations is a necessity for every country. both the receiving and sending countries have their respective obligations under international law. the purpose of this research is to find out whether america's actions in entering the empty russian consulate building in seattle violated the principles of inviolability and extraterritoriality in the 1963 vienna convention. this research was conducted using a normative juridical method, using 3 (three) approaches including statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. the united states as the recipient country in this study violated the principles of inviolability and extraterritoriality by breaking into an empty russian consulate building in seattle. america should respect the principles of inviolability and extraterritoriality by bringing third parties as neutral parties, and at that time there were no urgent or extraordinary conditions (force majeure). america itself ratified the 1963 vienna convention on diplomatic law so that america could be declared to have violated the principles of international law. Keywords: inviolability, premises, consulate, extrateritoriality Abstrak—Hubungan konsuler sebagai salah satu hubungan luar negeri merupakan kebutuhan bagi setiap negara. Baik negara penerima dan pengirim mempunyai kewajiban masing-masing dalam hukum internasional. Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini untuk mengetahui apakah tindakan Amerika yang masuk kedalam gedung konsulat Rusia yang kosong di Seattle melanggar prinsip inviolability dan extraterritorial dalam Konvensi Wina 1963. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan 3 (tiga) pendekatan antara lain statute approach, conceptual approach, dan case approach. Amerika Serikat sebagai negara penerima dalam penelitian ini melanggar prinsip inviolability dan extraterritoriality dengan melakukan pembobolan kedalam gedung konsulat Rusia di Seattle yang kosong. Amerika seharusnya menghargai prinsip inviolability dan extraterritoriality dengan membawa pihak ketiga sebagai pihak netral dan pada saat itu tidak terjadi kondisi mendesak atau hal luar biasa (force majeur). Amerika sendiri meratifikasi Konvensi Wina 1963 tentang hukum diplomatik sehingga Amerika dapat dinyatakan melanggar prinsip hukum internasional. Kata kunci: inviolability, premis, konsulat, ekstrateritorial
Restorasi Sebagai Pertanggungjawaban Pemulihan Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup Bagi Perusahaan Pemegang Izin Usaha Pertambangan Lingga Parama Liofa; Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo
JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Vol. 26 No. 02 (2023): Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24123/yustika.v26i02.6023

Abstract

Mining is a business that operates in the exploitation of natural resources, so the potential for natural damage is something that must be faced and addressed wisely. The Law on Environmental Protection and Management has made it mandatory for every person who pollutes the environment to restore environmental functions, one of which is restoration. In summary, restoration is an effort to restore environmental functions in the form of restoring the environment to its original condition. However, the Law on Mineral and Coal Mining stipulates that if the IUP or IUPK holder uses mining services, the responsibility for mining business activities remains borne by the IUP or IUPK holder. This results in a conflict of laws, resulting in a legal vacuum that requires mining service providers to carry out restoration as an action to restore environmental functions. Based on this, this research aims to analyze whether mining service providers whose services are used by mineral and coal mining can be required to carry out restoration as a form of responsibility for restoring environmental functions. The results of this research show that the imposition of mining responsibilities on IUP or IUPK holders also has an impact on the absence of obligations on mining service providers to carry out restoration.
AKIBAT HUKUM PERATIFIKASIAN PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA: STUDI KASUS KONVENSI PALERMO 2000 Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v1i1.1416

Abstract

AbstractRatification in Indonesia does not have any legal consequences for the application of the treaties at national level.  The reason is that ratification only binds Indonesia as a subject of international law. In comparison, parliamentary approval in the Indonesian context is not the same as the United States Senate’s approval. The Indonesian Government signed the Palermo Convention on December 12, 2000 and ratified it on April 20, 2009. The issue discussed here regards the legal status of this Convention.  In the 80’s it was assumed that any treaties ratified or acceded, would ipso facto be enforceable in Indonesia. I argued that Indonesia should be regarded as a state applying the monist approach, which legal practice seems to reject.  I stand for the monist approach especially with regard to the legal status of the 2000 Palermo Convention. In addition I also argue about the importance of differentiating between Indonesia’s international obligations and the issue of direct applicaton of the Convention by national couts. Keywords: Ratification, Integration, Implementation, Treaty, Indonesia’s legal system
Tanggung Jawab China Sebagai Negara Pihak Dalam Maritime Labour Convention 2006 Atas Tindakan Nahkoda Kapal Penangkap Ikan Berbendera China Gozal, Kenxie; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto; Muhammad Insan Tarigan
Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 20 No. 2 (2022): Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat dan Publikasi Ilmiah (LP3M) Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Al-Qodiri Jember, Jawa Timur Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Kopertais Wilayah 4 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/qodiri.2022.20.2.126-140

Abstract

Indonesian Shipmen died on a Chinese ship. According to their information, while working on the ship, they received improper treatment such as working beyond reasonable time, eating and drinking that did not meet their needs. In addition they must also continue to work even in sick conditions by receiving improper wages. This article aims to analyze the state of China responsible for the actions of the captain and / or the ship company that did not carry out obligations in the 2006 maritime labor convention which was ratified by China since November 12, 2015. This study uses a normative juridical method, namely by conducting a library study of legal ingredients. The results of this study are that China as a State Party in the 2006 Maritime Labor Convention must carry out the obligations agreed at the convention based on the Pacta Sun Servanda principle. Failure to implement the 2006 Maritime Labor Convention which results in losses for the state or other citizens may lead to the responsibility of the Chinese state as a party to the convention. Ship companies are also responsible for deviating from the provisions in the 2006 Maritime Labor Convention in the form of improper treatment such as working beyond reasonable time, eating and drinking that is not in accordance with their needs. In addition they must also continue to work even in sick conditions by receiving improper wages.
Kartel Bidang Usaha Bahan Bakar Minyak Non Subsidi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha Lingga Parama Liofa; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 21 No. 3 (2023): Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat dan Publikasi Ilmiah (LP3M) Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Al-Qodiri Jember, Jawa Timur Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Kopertais Wilayah 4 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/qodiri.2024.21.3.1182-1199

Abstract

Cartels are dangerous because business actors act monopolistically to determine very high price levels. One business sector that is prone to cartels is the fuel oil business (hereinafter referred to as fuel). This vulnerability is caused by the government only setting a formula for calculating the retail price of non-subsidized fuel oil. The problem is that fuel can be categorized as an item that can be excluded from monopoly action. This research aims to conduct an analysis of policies that give the market freedom to determine prices through a formula for calculating the retail price of non-subsidized fuel which could trigger cartel action. This research is important because business actors can carry out anti-competitive behavior but hide behind the privileges granted by law. The research uses normative juridical research methods. The results of this research show that there is a legal vacuum that regulates the limits of cartel actions that can be excluded in the context of businesses related to the livelihoods of many people. Therefore, it is best to determine the price of non-subsidized fuel as the responsibility of the government, namely by appointing an authorized institution. Competition will continue to arise when business actors can provide the best service so that consumers can choose the safest and most comfortable place to fill up with fuel. Keyword: Non-Subsidized Fuel; Cartels; Unfair Business Competition ABSTRAK: Kartel menjadi hal yang membahayakan karena para pelaku usaha bertindak monopolis untuk menentukan tingkat harga yang sangat tinggi. Salah satu sektor bisnis yang rawan terjadi kartel yakni dalam bisnis bahan bakar minyak (selanjutnya di sebut bbm). Kerawanan tersebut disebabkan karena pemerintah hanya sebatas menetapkan formula perhitungan harga eceran bahan bakar minyak non subsidi. Hal yang menjadi permasalahan yakni bbm dapat dikategorikan sebagai barang yang dapat dikecualikan dalam tindakan monopoli. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisis terhadap kebijakan yang memberikan kebebasan kepada pasar untuk menentukan harga melalui formula perhitungan harga eceran bbm non subsidi yang dapat memicu adanya tindakan kartel. Penelitian ini menjadi penting karena para pelaku usaha dapat melakukan perilaku anti persaingan namun berlindung dibalik previlege yang diberikan oleh undang undang. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekosongan hukum yang mengatur tentang batasan tindakan kartel yang dapat dikecualikan dalam konteks usaha yang berkaitan dengan hajat hidup orang banyak. Oleh karena itu, sebaiknya penentuan harga bbm non subsidi menjadi tanggungjawab pemerintah yakni dengan menunjuk lembaga yang berwenang. Persaingan akan tetap muncul ketika para pelaku usaha dapat memberikan pelayanan terbaik sehingga konsumen dapat memilih tempat mengisi bbm yang paling aman dan nyaman. Keyword: Bahan Bakar Non Subsidi; Kartel; Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat
Konflik Internal Dalam Pencak Silat: Perspektif Hukum Progresif SuJono; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 22 No. 1 (2024): Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat dan Publikasi Ilmiah (LP3M) Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Al-Qodiri Jember, Jawa Timur Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Kopertais Wilayah 4 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/qodiri.2024.22.1.15-29

Abstract

Ttraditional martial art that is rich in cultural and historical value, is often considered a symbol of unity and national pride in many Southeast Asian countries, including Indonesia. However, like other organizations or communities, martial art is also vulnerable to internal conflicts which can affect the organization itself and also have a negative influence on the surrounding environment. The purpose of this writing this article to determine the factors that cause internal organizational disputes, especially Petrsaudaraan Setia Hati Terate martial art organization in Madiun and solutions from Hukum Progresif. The research method that the author uses is Qualitative Research, namely by collecting data through observation and interviewing sources. The primary data source used is the martial artists in Madiun City, while the secondary data source used is PSHT trainers, ulama, community leaders, academics in Madiun and surrounding areas. Problems experienced by martial art organizations, especially PSHT leadership disputes in Madiun, can be resolved using Hukum Progresif theory with steps including mediation or dialogue, upholding human rights, fair distribution of human resources and adequate education for leaders. The causal factors are that individual PSHT members do not follow the rules of the organization. The claim of the validity of the recognition was because they were both students of different generations, so turmoil arose which led to conflict.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN KASUS PEMBANTAIAN RAS NUER DI SUDAN SELATAN DITINJAU DARI STATUTA ROMA 1998 Maria Hana Angelita; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto; Muhammad Insan Tarigan
CALYPTRA Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Calyptra : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya (November)
Publisher : Perpustakaan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract —The international legal provisions for the crime of genocide are regulated in Article 5 of the 1998 Rome Statute. The massacre case that occurred in South Sudan can be categorized as a crime of genocide primarily because it specifically attacked a particular group, namely the Nuer Race. South Sudan is not a state party to the 1998 Rome Statute. Judicial developments regarding the case until 2019 have not been resolved even though action has been taken by the African Union, so it is indicated that there is a condition of 'Unwilling' by South Sudan regarding the resolution of the case. The aim of this research is to provide a juridical analysis of whether the ICC as a complementary judicial institution with national jurisdiction can play a role in resolving cases even though South Sudan is not a party state. The research results refer to Article 12 paragraph 3 of the 1998 Rome Statute that the ICC has the authority to play a role in resolving cases as regulated in Article 13 letter b of the 1998 Rome Statute through the 'proprio motu' authority to the ICC Prosecutor to carry out investigations. Keywords: rome statute 1998, icc, crime of genocide, massacre of the nuer race south sudan, proprio motu Abstrak—Ketentuan hukum secara internasional dari kejahatan genosida diatur dalam Pasal 5 Statuta Roma 1998. Kasus pembantaian yang terjadi di Sudan Selatan dapat dikategorikan sebagai suatu kejahatan genosida utamanya karena secara khusus menyerang terhadap suatu kelompok tertentu yaitu pembantaian Ras Nuer. Sudan Selatan bukan merupakan negara pihak dalam Statuta Roma 1998. Perkembangan peradilan terhadap kasus hingga 2019 tidak terselesaikan meski telah ditindak oleh African Union, sehingga diindikasikan terdapat kondisi ‘Unwilling’ oleh Sudan Selatan terhadap penyelesaian kasus. Tujuan dari penelitian ini ingin memberikan analisis yuridis apakah ICC selaku lembaga peradilan pelengkap yurisdiksi nasional dapat turut berperan dalam penyelesaian kasus meski Sudan Selatan bukan merupakan negara pihak. Hasil penelitian mengacu pada Pasal 12 paragraf 3 Statuta Roma 1998 bahwa ICC memiliki kewenangan untuk ikut berperan dalam penyelesaian kasus sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 13 huruf b Statuta Roma 1998 melalui adanya kewenangan ‘proprio motu’ kepada Jaksa ICC untuk melakukan investigasi. Kata kunci: statuta roma 1998, icc, kejahatan genosida, pembantaian ras nuer sudan selatan, proprio motu
EFFECTIVENESS OF ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS ON WORKERS' ASSURANCE OF EMPLOYMENT AGAINST COMPANIES REGISTERING ONLY PART OF THEIR EMPLOYEES Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo; Suk, Hyun-Tae
EQUALEGUM International Law Journal Volume 3, Issue 2, 2025
Publisher : SYNTIFIC

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61543/equ.v3i2.131

Abstract

Background. The social security program, managed by the Social Security provider of human resources (BPJS Employment), was created by the government as a legal protection measure for workers. Companies that only register some of their employees with Assurance Employment are not following the rules set out in Article 15 of Law Number 24 of 2011 regarding workers’ assurance. This research aims to examine the BPJS Employment branch applies the law in dealing with companies that only register some of their workers. Research Method. This study is an Empirical Juridical research that uses qualitative descriptive analysis. This research was conducted in the BPJS Employment Surabaya Rungkut branch with two informants related to the regulation. Findings. Partially Registered Companies of workers are an example of violations mentioned in Article 32, paragraph (3) of Government Regulation Number 44 of 2015 about the implementation of work accident and death insurance. Because of this, unregistered workers are unable to claim the benefits of the social security program. Conclusion. The administrative actions taken by the BPJS Employment branch are in line with the applicable regulations, and the efforts made to handle PDS cases have been properly carried out.
Co-Authors Asdiana, Femmy Chomariyah, Chomariyah Gozal, Kenxie Handiwiyanto, Billy Harsono, Wiyono Kent Kurniawan Handi Krustiyati, J. M. Atik Lingga Parama Liofa Maria Hana Angelita Muhammad Insan Tarigan Nathania Shella Iskandar Pattynama, Francis Maryanne Priyanto, Hengky Budi Suhariwanto Sujono Suk, Hyun-Tae Winata, Oey Valentino Young, James Tirtowijoyo