Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.35
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal CALYPTRA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Veritas et Justitia PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Hukum tora: Hukum mengatur dan melindungi masyarakat Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan Indonesian Journal of International Law Hang Tuah Law Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Equalegum International Law Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada)
Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Legal Validity of the General Meeting of Shareholders Convened Pursuant to a District Court Order Subsequently Annulled by the Supreme Court Young, James Tirtowijoyo; Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2440

Abstract

This paper examines the legal paradox posed by the statutory finality of court orders authorizing the convening of General Meetings of Shareholders (GMS) under Article 80 (6) of Law No. 40 of 2007. Although the provision declares such orders is “final and has permanent legal force,” interpretive tension emerges where an order is issued ex parte in violation of the fundamental contradictory principle — notably audi et alteram partem — and subsequently annulled by the Supreme Court. Employing statutory, conceptual, and case-analysis approaches, the study analyzes the legal consequences of the landmark dispute concerning a GMS convened pursuant to District Court Order No. 1759/Pdt.P/2019/PN Sby, subsequently declared invalid ex post facto by Supreme Court Judgment No. 3241 K/PDT/2022. The inquiry contends that statutory finality is conditional rather than absolute, asserting that an order procured through procedurally defective proceedings is devoid of substantive legitimacy and may therefore be lawfully overturned. The Supreme Court’s annulment confirms that finality depends on observance of procedural guarantees and that annulment operates ex tunc, rendering resolutions adopted under the flawed Order void ab initio and stripping attendant notarial instruments of executorial force — with significant implications for corporate governance, registry practice, and the balance between legal certainty and due process.
Analysis of the Implementation of Good Corporate Governance Principles in Business Dispute Resolution in Companies in Indonesia Priyanto, Hengky Budi; Dewanto, Wisnu Aryo; Pattynama, Francis Maryanne
Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL AR RO'IS MANDALIKA (ARMADA)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/armada.v5i1.5441

Abstract

The principles of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) have become an essential foundation for ensuring business sustainability, stakeholder trust, and competitiveness in modern corporate practices. In Indonesia, the urgency of implementing GCG has increased following corporate scandals that revealed weaknesses in transparency, accountability, and oversight, often resulting in costly business disputes. This study aims to analyze the role of GCG in both preventing and resolving business disputes in Indonesian companies. Using a qualitative method with a systematic literature review, the research integrates findings from scholarly articles, regulatory documents, and case studies. Data were examined through thematic content analysis to identify patterns and relationships between governance practices and dispute outcomes. The results indicate that companies with strong GCG are significantly more effective in dispute prevention and resolution through mechanisms such as arbitration and mediation, thereby minimizing reliance on lengthy litigation. Case studies of PT Bank Century and PT Jiwasraya highlight how governance failures escalated disputes, while examples from PT Telkom illustrate the benefits of transparency and fairness in enabling constructive settlement. The findings suggest that GCG serves a dual role: as a preventive shield reducing the likelihood of disputes and as a dispute-resolution framework ensuring efficiency and fairness when conflicts arise. This study contributes to both academic discourse and practical policy recommendations, emphasizing that GCG is not merely regulatory compliance but a strategic necessity for corporate resilience and sustainable growth in Indonesia.
Pendekatan Teoritis Dan Praktis Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Hukum Modern Harsono, Wiyono; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 4 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i4.2192

Abstract

Keadilan restoratif merupakan paradigma baru dalam sistem hukum modern yang menempatkan pemulihan relasi sosial dan tanggung jawab moral pelaku sebagai inti keadilan, bukan sekadar pembalasan pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pendekatan teoritis dan praktik penerapan keadilan restoratif dalam kerangka hukum kontemporer dengan fokus pada transformasi nilai-nilai hukum menuju sistem yang lebih manusiawi dan berkeadilan sosial. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan normatif-yuridis dan komparatif dengan menelaah teori hukum, peraturan perundang-undangan, serta praktik penerapan di berbagai yurisdiksi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keadilan restoratif memiliki efektivitas tinggi dalam menurunkan angka pengulangan kejahatan, meningkatkan kepuasan korban, dan memperkuat kohesi sosial. Implementasinya di Indonesia mulai berkembang melalui berbagai kebijakan nasional, namun masih menghadapi kendala struktural, budaya hukum retributif, dan ketidaksiapan kelembagaan. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa keadilan restoratif perlu diintegrasikan secara sistematis dalam sistem hukum nasional melalui penguatan regulasi, kapasitas kelembagaan, dan kesadaran sosial, agar tercipta hukum yang substantif, partisipatif, dan berkeadilan bagi semua pihak
Co-Authors Asdiana, Femmy Chomariyah, Chomariyah Gozal, Kenxie Handiwiyanto, Billy Harsono, Wiyono Kent Kurniawan Handi Krustiyati, J. M. Atik Lingga Parama Liofa Maria Hana Angelita Muhammad Insan Tarigan Nathania Shella Iskandar Pattynama, Francis Maryanne Priyanto, Hengky Budi Suhariwanto Sujono Suk, Hyun-Tae Winata, Oey Valentino Young, James Tirtowijoyo