Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Humaniora SULUH: Jurnal Abdimas Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat IPTEKS Journal of Innovation and Community Engagement Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan Jurnal Manajemen Maranatha
Sherlywati Sherlywati
Program Studi Manajemen Universitas Kristen Maranatha
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Humaniora

 1 
A Study of Undergraduate Students’ Perception about Academic Advising in an Indonesian University Imelda Junita; Fanny Kristine; Sherlywati Limijaya; Tabita Emmanuella Widodo
Humaniora Vol. 11 No. 2 (2020): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v11i2.6490

Abstract

The aim of the research was to explore undergraduate students’ perceptions about academic advising in an Indonesian university by measuring aspects of academic advising, involving the nature of advising relationship, the frequency of activities occurring during advising sessions, and students’ satisfaction with academic advising. The research applied quantitative research conducted by administering a questionnaire. The sample consisted of 302 undergraduate students who were asked to respond about the type of academic advising they perceived, topics discussed between advisor and student during academic advising sessions, and their satisfaction with academic advising in the university. The results show that the undergraduate students at an Indonesian university perceive their academic advising as ‘developmental advising’ rather than ‘prescriptive advising’. Undergraduate students perceive that the advisors not only focus on academic performance but also students’ holistic development. Most students are satisfied with the academic advising they have experienced. The topics most frequently discussed are related to the registration and course selection, while the topics most rarely discussed are related to institutional policies. In general, 72,85% of students satisfy with the academic advising they have experienced.
Qualitative Review of Academic Advising Perceptions: Some Students Satisfied and Need It, Some Don’t Sherlywati; Fanny Kristine; Imelda Junita
Humaniora Vol. 13 No. 3 (2022): Humaniora
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/humaniora.v13i3.8046

Abstract

The research presented experiences in seeking academic advising patterns that produce satisfaction, urgency, and students’ academic and personal development at a university in Bandung, Indonesia. Data were collected using the story circle method. Four questions, including the meaning of advising, memorable experiences, perception of the process and advisors, and student expectations, were asked to answer the two main research questions. The two main questions involved the meaning and benefits of advising and satisfaction. A total of 57 respondents divided into seven groups of story circles were selected as participants using a purposive sampling method. Data were analyzed using a hierarchical Cresswell approach, starting from transcription, coding, categorizing, and developing themes. The results show that some students are satisfied with academic advising, but others feel dissatisfied even though it is important. The results also show that most advisors have created meaningful and memorable stories supporting student academic achievement. However, the relationship between lecturers and undergraduates determines the satisfaction level. The managers suggest from the research that it is necessary to hold coaching and counseling, training for advisors, and set a minimum procedural standard, including equating online communication channels because it minimizes the inequality of students’ satisfaction. 
Co-Authors Asni Harianti Carolina Eliot Simangunsong Erwin Ardianto Halim Ester Natalia Fanny Kristine Fanny Kristine Henky Lisan Imelda Junita Meily Margaretha Meyliana Nunnik Lestari Dewi Rapina Rini Handayani Salsabila, Unik Hanifah Sienly Veronica Silvia Sinta Setiana Sri Zaniarti Susanti Saragih Tabita Emmanuella Widodo Tan Kwang Tatik Budiningsih Tri Octaviani Yani Monalisa Yunita Chirsty