Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial International Journal Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din Jurnal Ulunnuha MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan
Achmad Azis Abidin
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Kehujjahan Hadis Mursal Menurut Imam Madzhab Empat Achmad Azis Abidin
International Journal Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din Vol 22, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (5072.82 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/ihya.22.2.5697

Abstract

According to the muhaddits, a hadis is acceptable and reliable to be hujjah in law when its sanad has continuous authority till the Prophet Muhammad, beside that the narrator who delivered it is a tsiqat (‘adil and dhabt). If some sanads are ommited between the successor and the Prophet Muhammad, the hadis is called mursal. Islam scholars have different views in measuring the credibility and realibility of mursal hadis. Some of them absolutely received mursal hadis to be hujjah, the other one received it by giving requisites, while the rest of scholars absolutely rejected it. This article presented the opinion of four Islamic legal schools (Imam Abu Hanifah (d. 148 H), Imam Malik bin Anas (d. 179 H), Imam Syafi’i (d. 204 H), and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (d. 241 H)) regarding the validity of mursal hadis as hujjah. This result of this arcticle revealed that Imam Abu Hanifah, Imam Malik bin Anas, and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal accepted mursal hadis as hujjah by generally requites. Furthermore, Imam Syafi’i accepted it by specially requites.
Shahadah 'Ilmy; Integrating Fiqh and Astronomy Paradigm in Determining The Arrival of Lunar Months in Indonesia Muh. Arif Royyani; Abdul Mufid; M. Ihtirozun Ni’am; Alfian Qodri Azizi; Achmad Azis Abidin
AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial Vol. 16 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia IAIN Madura collaboration with The Islamic Law Researcher Association (APHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v16i2.5320

Abstract

Formulating the fixed methodology for determining the beginning of Ramadan month and Islamic Feast in Indonesia is still ongoing. This article attempts to offer an integration between sharia and scientific views through 1) the concept of shahadah (witnessing) in the paradigm of fiqh and astronomy, and 2) the integration of those paradigms in determining the beginning of lunar months, particularly Ramadan and Syawal. This study uses qualitative methods in gaining the data then analyzes it using the approach of Miles & Huberman on interdisciplinary study. The findings of this research are as follows: 1) the concept of shahadah in the paradigm of fiqh is based on religious vows and factual evidence, while the astronomical paradigm perceives it from the certainty of external factors (weather, climate, environment, etc.). 2) Integration of those two paradigms results in better methods. It can turn the shahadah into the quality of qat'i (fixed) while the astronomic perspective gains more legitimacy. The integration is therefore called shahadah-'ilmi which potentially integrates the criteria of crescent visibility (imkan al-rukyah) in Indonesia to minimize the common occurrence on differences in determining those days. (Penetapan awal bulan Ramadhan dan Hari Raya di Indonesia masih terus dirumuskan metodologinya. Artikel ini menawarkan integrasi antara sudut pandang syari’ah dan saintifik melalui kajian atas 1) konsep syahadah dalam paradigma fiqh dan astronomi, 2) integrasi paradigma fiqh dan astronomi dalam menetapkan awal bulan Islam, utamanya Ramadhan dan Syawal. Penelitian ini menggali data dengan metode kualitatif kemudian menganalisisnya dengan pendekatan Miles & Huberman tentang kajian interdisipliner. Temuan penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut: 1) Konsep shahadah dalam paradigma fiqh adalah penglihatan yang disertai dengan sumpah dan bukti faktual, sementara dalam paradigma astronomi, shahadah didasarkan pada kepastian ukuran dari faktor–faktor eksternal meliputi cuaca, iklim dan lingkungan. 2) Integrasi dua paradigma tersebut menghasilkan metode yang lebih baik dalam penentuan awal Ramadhan dan Syawal. Shahadah dalam sudut pandang fiqh berubah menjadi qath’i (pasti), sementara hasil persaksian astronomi semakin memperoleh legitimasi. Integrasi kedua paradigma melahirkan konsep shahadah-'ilmi yang dapat digunakan untuk menentukan tampaknya hilal (rukyah hilal) awal Ramadhan dan Syawal di Indonesia sehingga perbedaan yang kerap terjadi dalam menentukan dua awal bulan tersebut dapat diminalisir.)
Reconstructing the Death of Prophet Muhammad Through Hadith Criticism and Historical Analysis Irfan Maulana Ahmad; Ahmad Musyafiq; Muhtarom Muhtarom; Achmad Azis Abidin
Jurnal Ulunnuha Vol 15, No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/ju.v15i1.12736

Abstract

This study examines the hadiths describing the final moments of the Prophet Muhammad’s (SAW) life through the application of isnād (chain) and matn (text) criticism, with particular focus on the differing narrations transmitted by ‘Ā’ishah bint Abī Bakr and ‘Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib. The research specifically aims to determine how matn criticism can be used to evaluate the historical reliability and interpretive implications of these narrations concerning the Prophet’s final moments. Employing a qualitative library-based approach and descriptive-comparative analysis, the study examines narrations found in Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Ṭabaqāt Ibn Sa‘d, and Durrah an-Nāṣiḥīn fī al-Wa‘ẓ wa al-Irshād, alongside theoretical perspectives from Dirāsāt fī al-Ḥadīth wa al-Tārīkh and Manhaj Kritik Matan ‘Ā’isyah RA. The analysis evaluates the continuity of transmission, reliability of narrators, textual consistency with the Qur’an and authentic hadiths, and the historical coherence of each narration. The findings reveal that the narration transmitted by ‘Ā’ishah bint Abī Bakr regarding the Prophet’s passing in her embrace is the strongest and most historically reliable narration, classified as ṣaḥīḥ li dhātihi. In contrast, narrations attributed to ‘Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib and Ibn ‘Abbās are categorized as weak (ḍa‘īf) or disconnected (maqṭū‘) due to deficiencies in transmission, although they continue to hold spiritual and moral significance. The study concludes that matn criticism plays a crucial role in distinguishing between historically authoritative reports and narrations functioning primarily as moral or devotional traditions, thereby contributing to a more objective understanding of the Prophet Muhammad’s (SAW) death.
ETHICAL HERMENEUTICS AS A FRAMEWORK FOR RELIGIOUS MODERATION: A STUDY OF AL-IKLĪL FĪ MA’ĀNI AL-TANZĪL BY KH. MISBAH MUSTOFA Achmad Azis Abidin; Rokhmah Ulfah; Eka Mulyo Yunus; Faza Nailil Muna Syahida
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 6, No 1 (2025): Contemporary Issues in Qur'anic Interpretation: Bridging Tradition and Modernity
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v6i1.12518

Abstract

Religious extremism continues to pose a major challenge in contemporary Islamic societies, particularly in plural contexts where competing interpretations of the Qur’an often generate exclusivism and intolerance. While existing studies on religious moderation largely approach this issue from sociopolitical or policy-oriented perspectives, there remains a significant gap in understanding how moderation is constructed as an ethical-hermeneutical practice within local Qur’anic exegetical traditions. This study aims to analyze how KH. Misbah Mustofa formulates religious moderation (wasat}iyyah) as an ethical hermeneutic in al-Iklīl fī Ma’āni al-Tanzīl, and to identify the moral principles and interpretive strategies underlying this framework. Employing a qualitative, library-based methodology, the research utilizes thematic content analysis of selected Qur’anic verses related to justice, balance, tolerance, and human responsibility as khalīfah fī al-ard}. The findings reveal that KH. Misbah conceptualizes moderation not as a political compromise or ideological midpoint, but as a dynamic ethical process that integrates textual interpretation with moral reasoning and social accountability. Anchored in Qur’anic values such as ‘adālah (justice), ta’ādul (balance), and ta’āruf (mutual recognition), his tafsir presents moderation as a cultivated moral virtue capable of resisting both religious extremism and ethical relativism. This study contributes to contemporary Qur’anic studies by advancing ethical hermeneutics as a robust analytical framework for religious moderation, highlighting the intellectual significance of Indonesian pesantren-based tafsir in global discussions on Islamic ethics, pluralism, and social harmony.
Co-Authors Abdul Mufid Ahmad Musyafiq Alfian Qodri Azizi Eka Mulyo Yunus Faza Nailil Muna Syahida Irfan Maulana Ahmad M. Ihtirozun Ni’am Muh. Arif Royyani Muhtarom Muhtarom Rokhmah Ulfah