Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

Keberlakuan Asas Lampaunya Waktu (Rechtverwerking) Dalam Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Muhammad Irfan; Marilang Marilang
Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 3 No 2 (2021): ALDEV
Publisher : Law Department, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v3i2.15280

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui keberlakukan asas lampaunya waktu (Rechtverwerking) dalam sistem hukum pertanahan di Indonesia serta untuk mengetahui hal-hal yang memengaruhi pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menerapkan rechtverwerking terhadap kasus sengketa kepemilikan tanah berdasarkan  Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1083/K/Pdt/2016. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan cara menerapkan studi kepustakaan. Bahan-bahan yang telah diperoleh, baik berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, maupun tersier akan dianalisis dengan metode deksriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa keberlakuan rechtverwerking dalam hukum pertanahan di Indonesia telah ada sejak zaman kolonial dan diterapkan dalam berbagai yurisprudensi pengadilan sehingga dalam penerapannya rechtverwerking sangat digantungkan pada putusan hakim yang mengadili perkara. Keberadaan rechtverwerking saat ini telah diwujudkan dalam Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah yang tujuannya adalah untuk mengatasi kelemahan dari sistem publikasi negatif pendaftaran dan sebagai bentuk jaminan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang sertipikat hak atas tanah sebagaimana diwujudkan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1083K/PDT/2016. Hal-hal yang mempengaruhi pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam mengadili perkara dalam Putusan Mahkamah Mahkamah Agung No. 1083K/PDT/ 2016 adalah hakim melihat pada unsur/syarat rechtverwerking sebagaimana dikemukakan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah, yakni telah diterbitkan sertipikat, lewat waktu 5 (lima) tahun, dikuasai oleh pemegang sertipikat, dan tidak adanya protes atas gugatan dalam waktu yang ditentukan. Namun, dalam pertimbangan hukumnya, hakim kurang mempertimbangkan mengenai unsur itikad baik Penggugat maupun Tergugat dalam perolehan tanah yang menjadi objek sengketa.
Kedudukan Akta Tanah Yang Dibuat Oleh Camat Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Risnawati Risnawati; Marilang Marilang
Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 2 No 2 (2020): ALDEV
Publisher : Law Department, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v2i2.15362

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat kedudukan akta tanah yang dibuat oleh camat selaku Pejabat Pembuat Akta tanah (PPAT) di Kecmatan Kajang, Kabupaten Bulukumba. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian empiris dengan pendekatan peraturan perudang-undangan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kekuatan akta tanah yang dibuat oleh Camat sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah di Kecamatan Kajang, Kabupaten Bulukumba memiliki kekuatan hukum sempurna karena bentuk akta sesuai dengan undang-undang, dibuat oleh dan di hadapan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah dalam hal ini Camat itu sendiri, dan akta dibuat oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah sesuai dengan wilayah kerjanya.
Maqashid Shariah: Implementation of the Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto Principle in the Litigation Process During the Covid-19 Pandemic A. Ummu Fauziyyah; Abd. Qadir Gassing; Marilang Marilang
FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman Vol 7, No 2 (2021): 11 Articles, Pages 181-378
Publisher : IAIN Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/fitrah.v7i2.4527

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic which has been afflicting Indonesians since the beginning of 2020 has a tremendous influence on their lives in variety of ways. The Indonesian government has taken steps to ensure that citizens are protected and that the number of positives is reduced. Keeping the rights of people seeking justice to continue litigating during the Covid-19 pandemic while simultaneously guaranteeing the safety of those infected with the virus is problematic in the field of law enforcement and justice during the Covid-19 epidemic. As a result, the government through the Supreme Court of Indonesia used the Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto principle which means that people's safety is the highest law by passively using technology in litigation and increasing the supporting facilities for strict health protocols throughout the judiciary, including the Sungguminasa Religious Court. In the context of Maqashid Syariah, the goal of this study was to show and explain the harmony of the use of the Salus Populu Suprema Lex Esto Principle during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This study took a qualitative and empirical approach. The study of primary data source was interviews conducted by judges and court personnel. Collecting, decreasing, presenting, and describing results were all part of the data analysis process. The findings of the investigation revealed that during the Covid-19 epidemic, the government's efforts to uphold justice while preserving the safety of the human soul, such as Maqashid Syariah's of the hifz an-nafs, which is at the primary level was dharuriyyah
Existence of Marriage Agreements in Islam Development Studies in the Community of Malay Border Indonesia-Malaysia Asman Asman; Marilang Marilang; Kurniati Kurniati
Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah Vol 19, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/jis.v19i1.1256

Abstract

This article explains how the Existence of the Marriage Agreement in the Sambas Community of the Indonesia-Malaysia Border. Based on the pros and cons of the Sambas Malay Society, especially about the marriage agreement regarding taklik talak as a marriage agreement in Islam. With qualitative research methods that are phenomenological observations in the field, the author wants to describe how the existence of divorce taklik talak as a marriage agreement in Islam itself and its practice in the Sambas Malay Community and the reasons for the pros and cons of religious leaders. Almost every prospective husband and wife in marriage to the Sambas Malay Community does not say sighat taklik talak by the husband to his wife after the ijab qobul consent. Sighat taklik talak only knowing that it has been written or listed in a marriage book without being notified to the husband and wife. Although divorce taklik talak has written in the marriage certificate is not an obligation to say. Still, once taklik talak has said, the taklik talak cannot be revoked again. If an agreement with a husband and wife did not fulfil by one of the parties, then the other party has the right to submit the matter to the Religious Court to resolve it. The study concludes that the pros and cons of divorce taklik talak as a marriage agreement in Islam cause a lack of knowledge about Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974 article 29 regarding marriage agreements and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) Article 46 concerning taklik talak. And the lack of socialization of related parties from KUA through religious counsellors and BP4 in Sambas.
Examining Call for the Dissolution of Indonesian Ulema Council: Siyāsah Syar’íyyah Perspective Abdul Syatar; Muhammad Imran; M Ilham; Kurniati Kurniati; Marilang Marilang; Kamaluddin Nurdin Marjuni
JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) Vol 22, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31958/juris.v22i2.6678

Abstract

The religious authoritative institution of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), is facing infiltration by members connected with acts of terrorism. This leads to public demands for its dissolution under the banner of "Joint Enemy Terrorism". Therefore, this study aimed to assess the possibility of dissolving MUI by reviewing the root causes of terrorism within the religious institution. Through the lens of Islamic political analysis and a critical examination of various data sources, it became evident that the discourse advocating for the dissolution centered around the hashtag #BubarkanMUI#. This hashtag campaign was initiated to frame the participation of MUI members in extremist activities, thereby posing a threat of criminal terrorism. MUI, on the other hand, was beyond dispute due to its strong and legally entrenched position. In this context, the prospect of the dissolution became irrelevant, impractical, and challenging to materialize primarily due to membership issues. The existence of MUI was strengthened and secured through several laws mandating its engagement, including the certification of halal products and regulation of Sharia banking. This showed the religious institution must embark on a thorough evaluation and enhancement of both its structural framework and membership recruitment processes. Regarding the authority to dissolve non-political institutions and organizations, this prerogative should be entrusted to the Constitutional Court, serving as a judicial entity responsible for safeguarding democracy, human rights, and constitutional principles.
Analisis Gugatan Pembatalan Adopsi Kepada Orang Tua Angkat Perspektif Hukum Islam Satriani Satriani; Marilang Marilang; Rahman Syamsuddin
Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : CV. Lenggogeni Data Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61292/eljbn.179

Abstract

This study aims to examine the general review of child adoption, analyze the lawsuit for annulment of adoption of adopted children, and the perspective of Islamic law related to adoptive parents who ask for compensation. The research method used is normative legal research with a literature approach. The results show that; Adopted children are entitled to maintenance and nafkah from adoptive parents. Adopted children do not have inheritance rights from the adoptive family. Adopted children can retain their biological family name or replace it with the name of the adoptive family. Adoption does not change the mahram relationship. Adopted children are entitled to the same protection as biological children. In Islam, adoption is not recognized. Adoptive parents may not ask for back grants to adopted children, including compensation for care. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji tinjauan umum tentang adopsi anak, menganalisis gugatan pembatalan adopsi anak angkat, dan perspektif hukum Islam terkait orang tua angkat yang meminta ganti rugi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa; Anak angkat berhak mendapatkan pemeliharaan dan nafkah dari orang tua angkat. Anak angkat tidak memiliki hak waris dari keluarga angkat. Anak angkat dapat mempertahankan nama keluarga biologisnya atau menggantinya dengan nama keluarga angkat. Pengangkatan tidak mengubah hubungan mahram. Anak angkat berhak mendapatkan perlindungan yang sama seperti anak biologis. Dalam Islam, adopsi tidak diakui. Orang tua angkat tidak boleh meminta kembali hibah kepada anak angkat, termasuk ganti rugi pengasuhan.Kata Kunci: Adopsi anak, hukum Islam, pembatalan adopsi, gugatan rekonvensi