Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

Criminal Liability Political Parties in Criminal Acts of Corruption: Indonesia Korea Comparison Lukitasari, Diana; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Ginting, Rehnalemken; Subekti, Subekti; Pratiwi, Dian Esti
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2021)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v6i2.33917

Abstract

Political parties are often in the spotlight because of the corrupt behavior of their members with the aim of party interests. The forms of criminal acts of corruption by cadres or political party administrators have various modes, including bribery, buying and selling positions, extorting strategic sectors, harming state finances, abuse of authority and misuse of budgets in development programs. Although there are many cases where political parties are suspected of being in the vortex of enjoying the proceeds of criminal acts of corruption, until now criminal responsibility is still borne by individuals, whether cadres or administrators of political parties. This study aims to provide an overview of the criminal liability arrangements of political parties in corruption in Indonesia and to conduct a comparative study of the accountability of political parties in Indonesia and South Korea. The research method used is non-doctrinal by taking secondary data sources with legal, conceptual and grammatical approaches. The results show that Indonesia still includes political parties as corporations, however, political parties in Indonesia are legal entities that cannot be held criminally responsible. South Korea is an example of a country that regulates criminal acts of political parties through their respective laws. In general, South Korea imposes criminal responsibility on persons or administrators of party members, not on the party itself.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF LAND BANK INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA (Comparative Study with the United States) Devi Febriyanti; Rehnalemken Ginting; Waluyo
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): March
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2608

Abstract

This study analyzes the idea and implementation of the Land Bank in Indonesia, comparing it with similar systems in other nations, especially the United States. This study aims to examine the Land Bank policy in Indonesia, juxtapose its frameworks with those in the United States, and formulate an optimal Land Bank concept suitable for implementation in Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical methodology using comparative legal and philosophical methods. The findings indicate that although the Land Bank in Indonesia has the same aims as its counterpart in the United States, namely land management for public benefit, there are considerable disparities in operational and regulatory methodologies. In Indonesia, the Land Bank is mostly centralized and oriented towards social concerns, but in the United States, it is more decentralized and operates as a financial entity. The optimal framework for a Land Bank in Indonesia must emphasize justice, openness, and sustainability, while enhancing the function of Notary/PPAT and improving the integration of land information systems. This study underscores the significance of cooperation among the government, corporate sector, and communities to establish an efficient and sustainable Land Bank in Indonesia.
Legal Study Concerning Zero Verdicts Related to the Principles of Certainty, Justice and Benefits in Indonesia Fauzia Awaludin; Rehnalemken Ginting
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): June : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v1i2.154

Abstract

A nil sentence is very appropriate to apply to defendants whose verdict is sentenced to death, such as in the case of Muhammad Natsir and Heru Hidayat. However, the Dimas Kanjeng case certainly raises a different problem, where the panel of judges imposed a maximum prison sentence of 20 years, so if there are other cases the verdict must be nil. This means that the defendant, who was previously sentenced to 20 years in prison, was not increased to life imprisonment. Another problem is the lack of integrated administration between courts which results in overlapping criminal sanctions that exceed 20 years. Tstelsel's absorption in a sharpened realist concursus states that it is necessary to review the level between crimes that have permanent legal force and crimes that have just been revealed based on higher criminal threats, so that the implementation of a nil sentence achieves the principles of legal certainty, justice and expediency. The implementation of the nil sentence must be socialized to the wider community, especially in the case of Dimas Kanjeng and Muhammad Natsir, who in their decision were sentenced to a nil sentence because they had previously been sentenced to death. The aim of the outreach is to ensure that there is no misunderstanding of the defendant's release from criminal sanctions, because a zero verdict arises because the verdict has been maximum and can no longer be handed down. Judges need to interpret in more depth the basic reasons for giving a nil verdict which is linked to SEMA No. 1 of 2022 to better ensure justice and benefits for society, which of course is adjusted to the legal facts obtained during the trial period.
CAUSES OF CHILDREN COMMITTING THEFT CRIMES (Case Study of the Ngawi District Attorney's Office in 2022) Ria Mahardika, Agustin Dwi; Ginting, Rehnalemken
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v2i1.157

Abstract

In the future, the child plays an important role in shaping the history, country and way of life of a country. In other words, children are the next generation of the nation. However, the potential for criminal behavior is also inherent in children. One of them is through theft. The factors that underlie children committing theft include family, environment, and even self. This study aims to determine and examine the factors that cause children to commit theft, as well as the efforts made to prevent this occurrence and law enforcement. This legal research uses descriptive analysis techniques by combining sociological or empirical approaches. Based on the results of the study, the main factors that encourage young people to commit theft in the Ngawi region are family, education, and economic factors. Poor education, weak economy, and a less harmonious family environment due to family conditions that are no longer intact due to divorce or death of parents, become additional factors in themselves. As a result, children lose positive role models on how to live their lives. To overcome this, efforts are needed to handle it as early as possible with various approaches and patterns of prevention, repressive, and curative handling.
Urgensi Kehati-Hatian Dalam Penggunaan Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif Hukum Di Era Digital Tika Andarasni Parwitasari; Ismunarno; Supanto; Riska Andi Fitriono; Rehnalemken Ginting; Sulistyanta
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.2711

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji urgensi peningkatan kesadaran hukum dan literasi digital dalam penggunaan media sosial guna mencegah kejahatan siber seperti kontaminasi nama baik, hoaks, pelanggaran privasi, dan kebencian kebencian. Fokus utama yang akan dibahas dalam tulisan ini adalah meningkatnya jumlah kasus hukum terkait media sosial di Indonesia, yang sering kali disebabkan oleh rendahnya pemahaman masyarakat terhadap penerapan hukum dari perilaku berani. Artikel ini mencoba melakukan pendekatan yuridis normatif, yaitu pendekatan peraturan-undangan dan konteks untuk menganalisis bagaimana norma hukum berinteraksi dengan praktik digital. Indonesia telah memiliki Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik serta perlindungan konstitusional dalam Pasal 28E dan 28J Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, meskipun demikian kesadaran masyarakat terhadap regulasi tersebut masih kurang. Akibatnya, media sosial sering disalahgunakan untuk tujuan penyebaran hukum seperti penyebaran informasi palsu atau kontaminasi nama baik secara berani. Artikel ini menekankan pentingnya peningkatan literasi hukum, pembaruan regulasi yang adaptif terhadap perkembangan digital, serta kolaborasi antara pemerintah, platform digital, dan dalam mendorong perilaku berani yang bertanggung jawab.