Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 29 Documents
Search

TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP PENOLAKAN UNTUK MENJADI PEMEGANG PROTOKOL NOTARIS Deselta, Azalia; Sulistiyono, Adi; Ginting, Rehnalemken
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol 12, No 2 (2023): November 2023
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v12i2.3191

Abstract

Abstrak: Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik. Setiap akta otentik tersebut memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sempurna, yang mana tidak diperlukannya alat bukti lain dalam pembuktian untuk memutuskan suatu perkara. Sehingga isinya sangat dirahasikan dan tidak semua orang dapat melihat isinya, kecuali para pihak dan yang pihak lain yang sudah ditentukan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Selain membuat akta otentik, notaris juga memiliki kewajiban untuk menyimpan akta-akta yang dibuatnya berupa minuta akta dan dokumen-dokumen lainnya dalam protokol notaris yang menjadi bagian dari pengadministrasian kantor. Protokol Notaris tersebut wajib dijaga dan dirawat karena sifatnya yang termasuk dalam arsip negara. Maka dari itu, sangat diperlukan penyerahan protokol notaris kepada pihak lain yang telah ditunjuk sebagai pemegang atau penerima protokol jika notaris pembuat akta tersebut bermasalah atau yang termasuk dalam kategori di Pasal 62 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Namun, dalam praktiknya sangat dimungkinkan jika pemegang atau penerima protokol menolak untuk menjadi pemegang protokol atas alasan apapun, seperti sedang sakit, kantor pemegang protokol yang sempit sehingga tidak ada tempat lagi untuk menyimpan protokol, dan sebagainya. Hal tersebut tidak diperbolehkan karena notaris wajib untuk menerima protokol meskipun tidak adanya dasar hukum yang jelas. Kewajiban tersebut tersirat dalam Pasal 2 ayat (3) huruf c Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi manusia Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 dan putusan pengadilan yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini. Maka dari itu, dalam putusan yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini menjadi dasar bahwa seorang notaris diwajibkan untuk menerima protokol notaris. Tanggung jawab yang diambil oleh pemegang protokol yang telah menolak untuk menjadi pemegang protokol notaris namun ingin membatalkannya adalah dengan membuat Pernyataan Pencabutan atas Surat Penolakan Menjadi Protokol meskipun penerima protokol dalam keadaan tidak memungkinkan.Kata Kunci: Protokol Notaris; Tanggung Jawab; Tolak Abstract: Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds. Each authentic deed has perfect legal force, which does not require other evidence in proof to decide a case. So that the contents are very confidential and not everyone can see the contents, except for the parties and other parties specified in the laws and regulations. In addition to making authentic deeds, notaries also have an obligation to keep the deeds they make in the form of deed minutes and other documents in the notary protocol which is part of the office administration. The Notary Protocol must be maintained and cared for because of its nature which is included in the state archives. Therefore, it is very necessary to hand over the notary protocol to another party who has been appointed as the holder or recipient of the protocol if the notary making the deed has a problem or is included in the category in Article 62 of the Notary Law. However, in practice it is very possible if the holder or recipient of the protocol refuses to become the protocol holder for any reason, such as being sick, the protocol holder's office is so small that there is no more space to store the protocol, and so on. This is not allowed because the notary is obliged to accept the protocol even though there is no clear legal basis. This obligation is implied in Article 2 paragraph (3) letter c of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 19 of 2019 and the court decisions examined in this study. Therefore, the decisions examined in this study serve as the basis that a notary is required to accept the notary protocol. The responsibility taken by a protocol holder who has refused to become a notary protocol holder but wants to cancel it is to make a Statement of Revocation of the Letter of Refusal to Become a Protocol even though the protocol recipient is in an impossible situation.Keywords: Notarial Protocol; Responsibility; Refusal
Kriminalisasi Pengobatan Alternatif Menggunakan Kekuatan Ghaib : Analisis Penerapan Pasal 252 KUHP 2023 dalam Melindungi Masyarakat dari Praktik Pengobatan Berbahaya Ruth Tiur Jovita Kase; Rehnalemken Ginting
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Maret : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i1.1281

Abstract

Alternative medicine using supernatural powers is a traditional practice widely found in Indonesia, but it is often conducted without scientific basis, causing negative impacts on society. These impacts include physical, financial, and psychological harm, such as delayed medical treatment leading to fatal outcomes, financial exploitation, and emotional manipulation. Article 252 of the 2023 Penal Code (KUHP) regulates this practice by imposing criminal sanctions on those who violate the law or harm the public. This regulation aims to protect the public, promote transparency, and integrate safe traditional elements into a modern, evidence-based medical system.
Analisis Problematika Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online di Indonesia Sulthanah, Miska Yusri; Ginting, Rehnalemken
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i1.1438

Abstract

The rapid development of technology has led to a transformation in gambling practices, shifting from physical establishments to online platforms. However, law enforcement in Indonesia continues to struggle with multiple challenges in addressing this issue. This research aims to assess the enforcement of online gambling laws based on Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory. It focuses on how legal structure, legal culture, and legal substance interact in the enforcement process.  The findings demonstrate that, first, in terms of legal substance, existing regulations are not yet fully effective in combating online gambling. Second, from the perspective of legal structure, law enforcement agencies face persistent challenges in combating online gambling. Third, from the perspective of legal culture, public legal awareness remains relatively low.
Implementasi Pemidanaan Judi Online Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Perjudian Online: Studi Putusan Nomor: 628/PID.B/2023/PN Sleman Bernardus Alessandro Imantaka; Rehnalemken Ginting
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.1736

Abstract

This study discusses criminal liability for perpetrators of online gambling crimes based on Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. The research employs a normative juridical approach with a case study method on Decision Number 628/PID.B/2023/PN Sleman. The defendant was proven to have knowingly distributed and disseminated links to online gambling sites via social media, as well as obtained financial gain from these activities. Based on the judge’s decision, the defendant was sentenced to 1 year and 8 months in prison and fined IDR 250,000,000. The results indicate that the application of Article 27 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 45 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law is in accordance with the principles of criminal liability, including the elements of fault (mens rea) and unlawful acts (actus reus). Nevertheless, challenges remain in law enforcement against online gambling, particularly regarding sites operating abroad and the low level of public legal awareness. The recommendations provided include a more comprehensive legal approach to enhance the effectiveness of combating online gambling in Indonesia.
Tinjauan Kriminologis terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bantuan Cadangan Beras Pemerintah (Studi Putusan No. 26/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Amb) Kristian Adi Nurpranata; Rehnalemken Ginting
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v2i2.2039

Abstract

Judicial sentencing through court judgments often does not align with the ideal objectives of sentencing itself, especially in cases involving corruption crimes. Judgment Number 26/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/Pn Amb serves as an example of the disparity between the prosecutor's sentence recommendation and the final verdict delivered by the judge. In this case, the prosecutor demanded a seven-year prison sentence, while the judge sentenced the defendant to only two years and six months, with the mitigating consideration that the defendant did not personally benefit from the state's financial loss. Therefore, the writer conducts an analytical review of this judgment through a criminological perspective and judicial reasoning. The analysis of Judgment Number 26/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/Pn Amb is intended to assess how well the judgment fulfills the ideal function of law.
Tinjauan Kriminologi Terhadap Religas Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Oleh Anak di BAPAS Surakarta Mutiara Nuqi Agustiana Putri; Rehnalemken Ginting
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Juli: Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v2i3.2037

Abstract

The increasing number of rape crimes by child perpetrators is a serious problem that needs to be reviewed in depth, not only from a legal aspect, but also from a criminological perspective that takes into account the child's social, psychological and environmental background. The type of research used is empirical legal research with a descriptive-analytical approach. This study relies on primary data obtained through direct interviews with staff at the Surakarta Correctional Facility and literature reviews of relevant laws and scientific literature. The results of the study indicate that internal factors such as past trauma, psychological disorders, and lack of moral understanding, as well as external factors such as family and social environments and weak supervision, are triggers for children to commit rape. The role of BAPAS Surakarta is proven to be crucial in efforts to provide support, rehabilitation, and social reintegration for children following court rulings. This study is expected to contribute scientifically to efforts to prevent and address sexual violence by children, as well as provide input for the government and correctional institutions in developing policies based on a child protection approach.
Criminal Liability Political Parties in Criminal Acts of Corruption: Indonesia Korea Comparison Lukitasari, Diana; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Ginting, Rehnalemken; Subekti, Subekti; Pratiwi, Dian Esti
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol 6, No 2 (2021): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2021)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v6i2.33917

Abstract

Political parties are often in the spotlight because of the corrupt behavior of their members with the aim of party interests. The forms of criminal acts of corruption by cadres or political party administrators have various modes, including bribery, buying and selling positions, extorting strategic sectors, harming state finances, abuse of authority and misuse of budgets in development programs. Although there are many cases where political parties are suspected of being in the vortex of enjoying the proceeds of criminal acts of corruption, until now criminal responsibility is still borne by individuals, whether cadres or administrators of political parties. This study aims to provide an overview of the criminal liability arrangements of political parties in corruption in Indonesia and to conduct a comparative study of the accountability of political parties in Indonesia and South Korea. The research method used is non-doctrinal by taking secondary data sources with legal, conceptual and grammatical approaches. The results show that Indonesia still includes political parties as corporations, however, political parties in Indonesia are legal entities that cannot be held criminally responsible. South Korea is an example of a country that regulates criminal acts of political parties through their respective laws. In general, South Korea imposes criminal responsibility on persons or administrators of party members, not on the party itself.
Legal Study Concerning Zero Verdicts Related to the Principles of Certainty, Justice and Benefits in Indonesia Fauzia Awaludin; Rehnalemken Ginting
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): June : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v1i2.154

Abstract

A nil sentence is very appropriate to apply to defendants whose verdict is sentenced to death, such as in the case of Muhammad Natsir and Heru Hidayat. However, the Dimas Kanjeng case certainly raises a different problem, where the panel of judges imposed a maximum prison sentence of 20 years, so if there are other cases the verdict must be nil. This means that the defendant, who was previously sentenced to 20 years in prison, was not increased to life imprisonment. Another problem is the lack of integrated administration between courts which results in overlapping criminal sanctions that exceed 20 years. Tstelsel's absorption in a sharpened realist concursus states that it is necessary to review the level between crimes that have permanent legal force and crimes that have just been revealed based on higher criminal threats, so that the implementation of a nil sentence achieves the principles of legal certainty, justice and expediency. The implementation of the nil sentence must be socialized to the wider community, especially in the case of Dimas Kanjeng and Muhammad Natsir, who in their decision were sentenced to a nil sentence because they had previously been sentenced to death. The aim of the outreach is to ensure that there is no misunderstanding of the defendant's release from criminal sanctions, because a zero verdict arises because the verdict has been maximum and can no longer be handed down. Judges need to interpret in more depth the basic reasons for giving a nil verdict which is linked to SEMA No. 1 of 2022 to better ensure justice and benefits for society, which of course is adjusted to the legal facts obtained during the trial period.
CAUSES OF CHILDREN COMMITTING THEFT CRIMES (Case Study of the Ngawi District Attorney's Office in 2022) Ria Mahardika, Agustin Dwi; Ginting, Rehnalemken
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v2i1.157

Abstract

In the future, the child plays an important role in shaping the history, country and way of life of a country. In other words, children are the next generation of the nation. However, the potential for criminal behavior is also inherent in children. One of them is through theft. The factors that underlie children committing theft include family, environment, and even self. This study aims to determine and examine the factors that cause children to commit theft, as well as the efforts made to prevent this occurrence and law enforcement. This legal research uses descriptive analysis techniques by combining sociological or empirical approaches. Based on the results of the study, the main factors that encourage young people to commit theft in the Ngawi region are family, education, and economic factors. Poor education, weak economy, and a less harmonious family environment due to family conditions that are no longer intact due to divorce or death of parents, become additional factors in themselves. As a result, children lose positive role models on how to live their lives. To overcome this, efforts are needed to handle it as early as possible with various approaches and patterns of prevention, repressive, and curative handling.
Urgensi Kehati-Hatian Dalam Penggunaan Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif Hukum Di Era Digital Tika Andarasni Parwitasari; Ismunarno; Supanto; Riska Andi Fitriono; Rehnalemken Ginting; Sulistyanta
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 6 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i6.2711

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji urgensi peningkatan kesadaran hukum dan literasi digital dalam penggunaan media sosial guna mencegah kejahatan siber seperti kontaminasi nama baik, hoaks, pelanggaran privasi, dan kebencian kebencian. Fokus utama yang akan dibahas dalam tulisan ini adalah meningkatnya jumlah kasus hukum terkait media sosial di Indonesia, yang sering kali disebabkan oleh rendahnya pemahaman masyarakat terhadap penerapan hukum dari perilaku berani. Artikel ini mencoba melakukan pendekatan yuridis normatif, yaitu pendekatan peraturan-undangan dan konteks untuk menganalisis bagaimana norma hukum berinteraksi dengan praktik digital. Indonesia telah memiliki Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik serta perlindungan konstitusional dalam Pasal 28E dan 28J Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, meskipun demikian kesadaran masyarakat terhadap regulasi tersebut masih kurang. Akibatnya, media sosial sering disalahgunakan untuk tujuan penyebaran hukum seperti penyebaran informasi palsu atau kontaminasi nama baik secara berani. Artikel ini menekankan pentingnya peningkatan literasi hukum, pembaruan regulasi yang adaptif terhadap perkembangan digital, serta kolaborasi antara pemerintah, platform digital, dan dalam mendorong perilaku berani yang bertanggung jawab.