Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Agrosilvopasture-Tech

Pengaruh Program Keluarga Harapan Terhadap Tingkat Kemiskinan di Desa Mamala, Kecamatan Leihitu, Kabupaten Maluku Tengah Selay, Ainayyah A; Girsang, Wardis; Luhukay, Johanna M
Jurnal Agrosilvopasture-Tech Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Agrosilvopasture-Tech
Publisher : Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/j.agrosilvopasture-tech.2025.4.1.63

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of PKH on the poverty level in Mamala Village. This research was conducted in Mamala Village, Leihitu Subdistrict, Central Maluku Regency, in February 2024. The sampling technique in this study used a simple random sampling technique, namely 60 respondents who were randomly selected, 30 PKH recipient respondents, and 30 non-PKH recipients. The data analysis method used in this research is a quantitative method using the Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis. The results showed that the family hope program had an effect on improving the household income of PKH recipients.
Kemiskinan Rumah Tangga Petani di Daerah Transmigrasi: Studi Kasus Desa Waihatu Kecamatan Kairatu Kabupaten Seram Bagian Barat Gultom, Eka N; Girsang, Wardis; Parera, Weldemina B
Jurnal Agrosilvopasture-Tech Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Agrosilvopasture-Tech
Publisher : Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/j.agrosilvopasture-tech.2025.4.1.95

Abstract

This research aims to find out how big the level of poverty and inequality is in Waihatu Village, Kairatu District, West Seram Regency. The number of respondents was 50 (12%), who were determined simply randomly from 430 farming households. Primary data was obtained through observation and interviews using questionnaires, and secondary data was obtained from references to documents and previous research results. The research results show that food expenditure is greater than non-food expenditure. There were 7 (people) poor respondents, and the gap in Waihatu was low because the bottom 40% received 18% (34%) of total expenditure.