Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Green Taxonomy as a Basic Concept of Sustainable Finance Through Green Bond Issuance Prakoso, Bhim; Hariyani, Iswi; Wahjuni, Edi; Ali, Moh.; Wardhana, Rhama Wisnu
Acten Journal Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1: Apr 2025
Publisher : PT Matra Cendikia Abadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71087/ajlr.v2i1.31

Abstract

The increasing awareness of global issues in the sustainable development goals (SDGs) agenda initiated by the UN, has given rise to green investment in the economic sector, especially in the financial aspect. Referring to capital activities aimed at projects that address global issues. In recent years, green investment practices have begun to increase both in terms of the number of debt securities from individuals and countries participating in supporting the realization of SDGs 2030. In the Indonesian Capital Market there is a new financial instrument called green bonds. Green Bonds are regulated through the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) Number 60 of 2017, as is the authority held by OJK regarding the regulation of the financial services sector in Indonesia. This article will discuss the legal status of green bonds in Indonesia and whether green bonds can be one of the financing schemes in Indonesia. However, interest in green bonds is still quite low considering the obstacles that result in investment risks. The research method with a normative juridical type, using literature and descriptive studies in solving problems, this research is expected to not only answer the risks but also the utility of green bonds in realizing economic and environmentally sustainable development goals.
THE APPLICATIONS OF DECLARATION DECISIONS ON CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW IN INDONESIA Zulaika, Emi; Erfandy, Noviandy Nur Fadillah Putranti; Hariyani, Iswi
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1377

Abstract

Declaratory judgment is one of the decisions that can be given by the court to confirm a pre-existing legal right or situation, and not to provide new recognition or ratification. Declaratory decisions do not require execution because the decision explains the existing situation or the actual situation. The Civil Procedure Law has not fully addressed the problems related to execution that have become complaints from the public, especially regarding the governance and execution procedures that can produce an effective and efficient process. Some of the problems that will be analyzed are whether a declaration decision can be requested for execution and find out the time limit for requesting execution of the declaration decision. Furthermore, the study will explore the broader implications of these legal gaps, such as how they contribute to delays in the resolution of disputes and the challenges faced by parties seeking justice. This lack of clear regulation significantly hinders the smooth enforcement of the judicial process and contributes to unresolved legal disputes. Juridical-normative research results in finding a legal vacuum in the regulation of execution of civil procedural law in Indonesia. In this case, it’s the declaration decision that does not need to be requested for execution, if you want to execute it, you need to file a new lawsuit. However, it should be noted that there is no provision that regulates the period of time when the decision must be executed by the losing party or the time limit for the execution of the execution decision.
RESTRUKTURISASI UTANG PT GARUDA INDONESIA, Tbk. SEBAGAI UPAYA PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG KEPADA KREDITUR Widya Sari Amalia; Iswi Hariyani; Bhim Prakoso
MIMBAR YUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul Ulum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v6i2.3658

Abstract

PKPU has a goal to improve the company from an economic standpoint and the company's ability as a debtor to make a profit, with this step it is hoped that the company can pay off its obligations. Settlement is not defined by Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (hereinafter referred to as the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU). However, in this case the general understanding is as normalized in Article 222 of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU that in principle the reconciliation plan includes an offer to pay part or all of the debt to creditors. In bankruptcy and PKPU cases, all creditors and debtors have the opportunity to submit a peace plan which can be part of a debt restructuring. SOEs have a responsibility in the problems being faced by PT Garuda Indonesia, Tbk. PT Garuda Indonesia, Tbk. is unable to pay its debts to creditors because of the equity of PT Garuda Indonesia,Tbk. recorded negative. The enormous debt made PT Garuda Indonesia, Tbk. choose to do debt restructuring even though the path chosen has a risk of bankruptcy. Even though PT Garuda Indonesia, Tbk. is experiencing financial problems. continue to run its business, this is in line with the principle of business continuity as normalized in 240 of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU.