Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : rechtidee

PROBLEM DOKTRIN RASISME ETNIS CHINA SEBAGAI WNI (STATUS KEWARGANEGARAAN ETNIS CHINA) Sidik Sunaryo; Shinta Ayu Purnamawati
RechtIdee Vol 15, No 1 (2020): June
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v15i1.7278

Abstract

Keanekaragaman harus menjadi kekayaan dan bukan hanya sekedar beda yang satu. Tulisan ini mencoba menjelaskan problem doktrin hukum formal Negara (Konstitusi) yang mengatur tentang hubungan antara Ras (Keturunan atau Etnik) yang ada di Indonesia. Hukum tentang pengaturan Ras (Keturunan atau Etnik) di Indonesia, tidak bisa dilihat dari perspektif  baik dan buruk saja, tetapi hukum pengaturan Ras (Keturunan atau Etnik) di Indonesia harus dilihat dalam perspektif benar dan salah. Antara ketentuan satu dengan yang lainnya masih saling bertentangan yang menjadi penyebab problem konstitusional ketidakteraturan hukum yang mengatur jaminan hak dan kewajiban bagi WNI ras dan etnis China secara sejajar dengan WNI asli. Pembedaan WNI asli dan tidak asli menjadi bukti problem ketidakteraturan hukum yang menjustifikasi Rasisme di Indonesia. Hal ini mengakibatkan perbedaan perlakuan dari penyelenggara Negara terhadap WNI tidak asli dari ras dan etnis China dalam bidang sosial, budaya, agama, kependudukan dan keimigrasian.
Child Data Protection and Commercial Sharenting: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Indonesia and Egypt Qoneta Masusiyah; Kana Zahra Alma Sayogi; Eksytania Khaila Gisca Nugroho; Shinta Ayu Purnamawati; Muhammad Ahsin Lana
RechtIdee Vol 21, No 1 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v21i1.32358

Abstract

Study Objectives: This article compares Indonesian and Egyptian law to assess how each jurisdiction protects children whose images, identities, locations, emotions, and behavioral traces are disclosed or monetized online.Method/Approach: The study uses normative legal research, including statute, conceptual, and functional comparative approaches.Novelty: It compares Indonesian constitutional guarantees, the Child Protection Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, materials with Egypt’s Personal Data Protection Law No. 151 of 2020 and Executive Regulations No. 816 of 2025, read against the Convention on the Rights of the Child and General Comment No. 25.Findings: The article finds that Indonesia has developed a more explicit child-online-safety framework for electronic-system providers, including age-appropriate design, high privacy settings, risk assessment, and reporting duties. Egypt provides greater operational precision in data processing, notably by treating children’s data as sensitive and requiring explicit,  written consent from a guardian for children under 15. Both systems nevertheless leave a regulatory gap where parental authority, commercial sharenting, and platform monetization are.Conclusion: The article proposes a child-centered compliance model that combines age-sensitive assent, guardian consent, a best-interests assessment for commercial child content, traceable takedown procedures, and platform duties to prevent profiling, amplification, and reuse of high-risk child data.