Yuliana Setyaningsih
Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Gramatika

ARGUMENT CONSTELLATION IN JOURNAL ARTICLES: TOULMIN STEPHEN PERSPECTIVE (KONSTELASI ARGUMEN DALAM ARTIKEL JURNAL: PERSPEKTIF STEPHEN TOULMIN) Yuliana Setyaningsih; R. Kunjana Rahardi
Jurnal Gramatika Vol 6, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/jg.2020.v6i2.4079

Abstract

A constellation of arguments is present in each component of a journal article. Understanding the constellation of arguments in such journal articles is important because they will directly affect the writing of journal articles. This study aims to describe the constellation of arguments in the structure of the intended journal article. Data were collected by the observation method. The technique used in the framework of applying the method of referencing was a competent free observation technique. The next technique is note-taking. Data validation is done theoretically by confirming the available data on the theories. Also, validation is carried out to experts who master the matters of argument. The data validation was done after the data had been classified and verified. The data analysis method applied in this research is the method of distribution or distribution. The technique applied is a technique for direct elements.The data analysis method applied was the content analysis method. The results of the analysis were presented with informal presentation techniques. This research had produced the findings of the constellation of arguments in sections of journal articles. The parts of the journal article that may be present in the argument are in the following sections: (1) background, (2) literature review, (3) method, and (4) discussion. There is no argument in the conclusion section of the paper.
MODAL QUALIFIERS AS BOOSTER IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING OF THE THESIS DISCUSSION SECTION (MODAL QUALIFIERS SEBAGAI BOOSTER DALAM TULISAN ARGUMENTATIF PADA BAGIAN PEMBAHASAN TESIS) Yuliana Setyaningsih; R. Kunjana Rahardi; Refa Lina Tiawati
Jurnal Gramatika Vol 9, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/jg.2023.v9i1.6316

Abstract

The importance of using modal qualifiers as a component of argumentative writing in the discussion section of student theses has not been fully realized by students. In fact, this component greatly determines the level of strength of the argument as a vehicle for conveying scientific truth. Scientific truth can be tested through the strength of the argument that appears in the selection of the types of modal qualifiers that accompany the position statement. This study aims to describe the manifestation of the form and function of the modal qualifier as a booster in argumentative writing for thesis discussion. The research data is in the form of excerpts of claims which contain boosters from the thesis discussion section of students of the Indonesian Language Education Master’s Program at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. Data was collected by listening method with note-taking technique. Furthermore, the stages of classification and typification of data are carried out. The analytical method used in this study is the distributional analysis method and the content analysis method. The results of this study are the following forms of capital qualifiers as boosters: (1) definitely, (2) necessary, (3) must, (4) certainly, and variations in form. This study also found seven booster functions as follows: (1) affirming by showing confidence, (2) affirming by giving recommendations, (3) affirming by confirming something, (4) affirming by confirmation of clarity, (5) affirming by inferring purpose, (6) affirming of intent by ensuring, (7) affirming by suggesting something.