Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.56
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Legalitas Yustisia Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Journal of Social Science
Abdul Madjid
Departemen Of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Chemistry Education Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Relation Between Plea of Guilty and Defendants Right in RUU KUHAP (An Overview Through “Jalur Khusus” System) Intan Khoirun Nisa'; Abdul Madjid; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p06

Abstract

The stacks of cases in judicial institutions hinder achieving the principles of fast, simple, low-cost justice. Through the Drafting Team for the Criminal Procedure Code Draft, the intention is to try to adopt a system that commonly applies in the common law legal system, namely plea bargaining “jalur khusus”” which is shown in Article 199 of the RUU KUHAP. This research intends to examine the concept of plea of guilty used in special channels and to look for the relationship between giving a plea of guilty and the rights of the defendant. This research uses normative juridical research methods or library legal research using conceptual and analytical approaches. The technique for collecting legal materials used is the library research model. From this research it can be concluded that the plea of guilty given by the defendant to the indictment by the public prosecutor must be voluntary, in this case, the judge will assess the truth of the Plea of Guilty. It brings consequences that the trial process will faster for the defendant. However, ““jalur khusus”” do not specifically regulate what defendant right will release if he confesses to the charges, moreover there is a gap that need to be resolve. This has the potential for uncertainty for the defendant. Apart from that, there is no regulation regarding the right to file legal action which will have an impact on the defendant's right to obtain legal certainty regarding efficient time to achieve a speedy trial.
Pertanggungjawaban Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Perihal Surat Pernyataan Keabsahan Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Elektronik Arifatul Aininta Mardjoni; Abdul Madjid; R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi’i
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i01.p15

Abstract

After the enactment of ATR/BPN Ministerial Regulation Number 5 of 2020 concerning Electronic Integrated Mortgage Services, the regulations regarding the Statement of Validity and Veracity of Documents as a condition for registering Electronic Mortgage Rights which must be attached to the PPAT will apply. This research aims to examine in more depth the limits of PPAT's responsibility as guarantor of the Statement of Validity and Correctness of Documents, bearing in mind that the inclusion of this letter is mandatory based on article 10 paragraph 2 of the ATR/BPN Ministerial Regulation because it is part of the administrative procedure in registering the latest electronic mortgage rights. The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The results of this research explain that the difference between Conventional Ht and Ht-el has additional provisions, where PPAT is responsible for the Letter of Accountability for the validity and correctness of the documents which are a requirement for complete registration of Mortgage Rights. This is regulated in ATR/BPN Ministerial Regulation No. 5 of 2020. However, PPAT's responsibility in terms of this statement of truth is limited to formal truth only, and is also limited to the duties of PPAT's position. However, if there is an error or negligence committed by PPAT and as long as it can be proven, then PPAT can be held administratively, civilly or criminally responsible. Setelah diberlakukannya Permen ATR/BPN Nomor 5 Tahun 2020 tentang Pelayanan Hak Tanggungan Terintregasi Secara Elektronik maka berlakulah peraturan mengenai Surat Pernyataan Keabsahan dan Kebenaran Dokumen sebagai syarat pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Elektronik yang wajib dilampirkan PPAT. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji lebih dalam megenai batasan pertanggungjawaban PPAT selaku penjamin Surat Pernyataan Keabsahan dan Kebenaran Dokumen, mengingat penyertaan surat ini wajib berdasarkan pasal 10 ayat 2 Permen ATR/BPN karena merupakan bagian dari prosedur administratif dalam pendaftaran hak tanggungan eletronik yang terbaru. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normative. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Perbedaan antara Ht Konvensional dan Ht-el memiliki ketentuan tambahan, di mana PPAT bertanggung jawab atas Surat Pertanggungjawaban keabsahan dan Kebenaran Dokumen yang menjadi syarat kelengkapan pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan. Hal ini diatur dalam Permen ATR/BPN No.5 Tahun 2020. Namun, pertanggungjawaban PPAT dalam hal surat pernyataan kebenaran ini sebatas kebenaran formil saja, dan juga sebatas sesuai dengan tugas jabatan PPAT. Namun jika memang terjadi kesalahan atau kelalaian yang dilakukan oleh PPAT dan selama dapat dibuktikan, maka PPAT dapat bertanggungjawab secara administratif, perdata maupun pidana.
Imposing Corporate Death Penalty in Indonesia: A Discourse on Penalisation, Corporate Culture, and Deferred Prosecution Agreement Alfons Zakaria; Abdul Madjid; Bambang Sugiri; Sihabudin Sihabudin; Fareed Mohd Hassan
Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Vol 8 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of law Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/UJLC.2024.v08.i02.p04

Abstract

The Indonesian Penal Code 2023 regulates corporate criminal liability. It covers various issues, including the actions of a corporation that amount to corporate crimes, the conditions under which a corporation can be held criminally responsible, who can be held accountable, and the types of criminal sanctions imposed on corporations. The primary criminal sanction is the imposition of fines. However, several types of additional punishments may also be imposed, including dissolution of the corporation or, in other words, the “corporate death penalty”, which leads to a permanent termination of the corporation's operations, loss of jobs for employees, termination of production, and stoppage of tax payments to the government. Thus, if imposed without caution, corporate death penalty will negatively impact the state and society. This article analyses the effect of corporate death penalty on the society and highlights the need for judges to exercise caution before dissolving a corporation. The study applies normative legal research with the statutory and comparative approach. Primary and secondary legal materials were analysed. This article argues against the imposition of corporate death penalty in Indonesia for three reasons. First, Indonesia does not have sentencing guidelines for corporations. Second, Indonesia has not developed a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) mechanism yet, which is an obstacle to developing a better corporate culture. Third, corporate death penalty has harmful impacts on a country's economy and public welfare; among others, it increases the unemployment rate, which impacts social life.
Co-Authors Ahmad Fauzi Ahmad Fauzi Alfons Zakaria Apripari, Apripari Arifatul Aininta Mardjoni Bambang Sugiri Fareed Mohd Hassan Intan Khoirun Nisa' Marina Rona Masruchin Ruba'i Megah Novita Endriyanti Mohammad Fadli Norentia Ekunming Sari Nurini Aprilianda Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi’i Rachmad Safa’at Setiawan Noerdajasakti Sihabudin Sihabudin Silvony Kakoe Suhariningsih Suhariningsih Sulvia Triana Hapsari Sulvia Triana Hapsari Suwitno Yutye Imran