Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Sinergi

Usability Evaluation for Mobile Health Application: Systematic Literature Review Septiani, Winnie; Rahmawati, Novia; Safitri, Dian Mardi; Luis, Martino
SINERGI Vol 28, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Mercu Buana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22441/sinergi.2024.2.009

Abstract

Health applications have unique characteristics compared to other applications. This application is needed to support the health of users/families with various facilities provided according to their functions and objectives. Usability measurement is carried out to evaluate the successful use of the application using various usability criteria. This study aimed to identify, analyze, and synthesize the usability evaluation of a mobile health application. The review was carried out on 65 selected papers from 799 usability papers from the Web of Science and Scopus in the 2013 to 2023 time period. The Systematic Literature Review approach used is the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Based on the review results, it was identified that usability measurement on mobile health applications aims to validate system design, compare usability methods, improve application performance, and evaluate usability. Meanwhile, mHealth apps mostly function for treatment and self-care/self-management. Most of the reviewed papers used the general public as respondents. The respondents or participants in these studies are diverse and can be categorized into five groups: patients, healthcare professionals, older adults, experts, and the general public. Most of the research aims to evaluate usability with the most widely used method, the System Usability Scale, which is equipped with other supporting methods.
Spatial decision-making model for priority development of Indonesia coast guard stations Adiatmaja, Novianto Hary; Septiani, Winnie; Dewayana, Triwulandari Satitidjati; Luis, Martino
SINERGI Vol 29, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Mercu Buana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22441/sinergi.2025.1.015

Abstract

Indonesia Coast Guard (IDNCG) is a paramilitary agency in charge of security and safety patrols in Indonesian maritime waters. The research objective is to develop priorities for the development of 35 IDNCG stations are expected to be constructed within 3 years and are considered priority project to face the increasing threats at sea. However, there is presently no system to provide support for the scientific solutions to prioritize station development despite the need for immediate decisions. This research was used to design model for determining station development priorities using the integration method of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). GIS was used as an effective tool for identifying and taking measurements in certain areas. Meanwhile, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods such as AHP and TOPSIS provided structural and pairwise quantification, as well as comparisons between elements and criteria for ranking station construction priorities. The most suitable alternative stations to be prioritized were determined by integrating the three methods which were classified as cost-effective for decision-making. Model was based on four criteria, including distance to Archipelagic Sea Lanes (ASL), Distance to the port, vulnerability coverage, and vessel density coverage. Stations were ranked based on a three-year development plan. The location ranking is then expressed in the form of a map to be used by policy makers in determining priorities for developing IDNCG Stations which will have an impact on increasing security and safety in Indonesian waters.