Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.945
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora JURNAL HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Jurnal Politik Profetik Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial POLITICO SOSHUM : Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora [Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities] Mitra Mahajana: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Tunas Agraria Community Services Journal (CSJ) Jurnal Pengabdian Sosial Indonesia
Bayu Adhinata
Department Of Government Universitas Warmadewa
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Eksklusi Atas Ruang Hidup: Mempertahankan Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Petani di Kawasan Taman Wisata Alam Batur, Kintamani Adhinata, Bayu
Tunas Agraria Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Tunas Agraria
Publisher : Diploma IV Pertanahan Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31292/jta.v8i1.363

Abstract

This research aims to examine agrarian conflicts between farmers and tourism investors in the Bukit Payang Nature Tourism Park (TWA), Kintamani. The presence of investors with permits to use 85.66 hectares for tourism development threatens the livelihoods of hundreds of farming families who have lived in this area since the 1920s. This research employed qualitative methods and a case study approach. Data collection was carried out by interviewing informants selected purposefully. The study included five informants, including three community leaders, one informant from the Legal Aid Institute in Bali, and one expert in agrarian law. This research shows that TWA residents have been marginalized. The community then fought back by blocking every attempt by the company to enter the area. Apart from that, the community also shows their resistance by defending their rights to their living space, resulting in contestation in the fight for economic spaces in the conservation area. There are at least four exclusionary powers that occur in the management of the Bukit Payang TWA area. Regulatory power, coercion, markets, and legitimacy. These four powers form an effort to exclude the community from access rights to resources in the TWA area.   Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji konflik agraria antara petani dan investor pariwisata di Taman Wisata Alam (TWA) Bukit Payang, Kintamani. Kehadiran investor dengan izin pemanfaatan 85,66 hektar untuk pengembangan pariwisata mengancam mata pencaharian ratusan keluarga petani yang telah menghuni kawasan ini sejak 1920-an. Metode kualitatif digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara informan yang dipilih secara purposif. Informan berjumlah lima orang yang terdiri atas tiga orang tokoh masyarakat, satu informan berasal dari LBH (Lembaga Bantuan Hukum) Bali, dan satu orang pakar hukum agraria. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa telah terjadi upaya peminggiran masyarakat yang mendiami kawasan TWA tersebut. Masyarakat kemudian melakukan perlawanan dengan menghadang setiap upaya dari perusahaan untuk masuk ke wilayah tersebut. Selain itu masyarakat juga menunjukkan resistensi mereka dengan mempertahankan hak atas ruang hidup mereka sehingga terjadi kontestasi dalam perebutan ruang-ruang ekonomi dari kawasan konservasi tersebut. Terdapat setidaknya empat kuasa eksklusi yang terjadi dalam pengelolaan kawasan TWA Bukit Payang ini. Kuasa regulasi, pemaksaan, pasar, dan legitimasi. Keempat kuasa tersebut membentuk upaya pengecualian masyarakat terhadap hak akses atas sumber daya yang ada di kawasan TWA.
The Politics of Land Grabbing: Dispossession and Depeasantization in A Coastal Village of Bali Adhinata, Bayu
Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Sosiologi: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan
Publisher : Departement of Communication and Community Development Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22500/13202552920

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the existence of land grabbing that leads to depeasantization, taking a case study in a village on the southern coast of Tabanan District, Bali Province called Pangkung Tibah Village. In this village, investors have transferred ownership of the productive peasants' land with plans to develop an integrated tourism area. This study is interesting because most studies on agrarian affairs focusing on Bali only focus on land conversion. This study will contribute to the topic of depeasantization. The method used in this study is qualitative with a case study approach. There are three informants involved in this study: the primary informant being the Head of Pangkung Tibah Village and two first-generation peasant who were subak administrators. Data analysis in this study combines in-depth interview data collection, observation, and spatial data analysis. Triangulation of the three techniques helps researchers process data and present it into research themes. The results of this study indicate that the land grabbing process occurred in the 1990s, marked by the massive transfer of land ownership to investors. Peasant was thrown from their subsistence production methods and experienced semi-proletarian conditions. The changing culture of peasant households also contributed to depeasantization.
Ketika Ruang Adat Dinegosiasikan: Politik Pemekaran Banjar Adat Tamblingan menjadi Desa Adat Tamblingan Sari, Ni Made Kartika; Adhinata, Bayu
JPP (Jurnal Politik Profetik) Vol 14 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Department of Political Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/profetik.v14i1a4

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the political process underlying the splitting of the customary territory and the roles of customary actors involved in that process through the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) approach, by mapping the networks of both human and non-human actors and examining the political motives that underpin them. A qualitative research method was employed because it is considered the most appropriate approach for uncovering the deeper meanings embedded in the dynamics of customary politics and complex social interactions, while also enabling the researcher to understand social reality holistically from the perspectives of the actors involved. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with six informants, consisting of the initiator of customary territorial splitting, the former Chief of Munduk Customary Village, the Chair of Team 9 MADT, a representative of MDA Bali, and two community representatives involved in the territorial splitting process, including both supporters of and opponents to the splitting. The findings indicate that this process was shaped by the interests of various actors who drew upon customary legitimacy and ancestral history as sources of justification. Political motives such as material incentives, group solidarity, and an idealistic commitment to the preservation of customary institutions were clearly evident and constituted the primary drivers of the customary territorial splitting. From the perspective of ANT, the territorial splitting occurred through the formation of network consisting human actor (customary leaders, village officials, political elites, and community members) and non-human actor (decrees, historical narratives, and the sacred symbols of Tamblingan). These elements were interconnected in the construction of alliances and legitimacy. Tamblingan, with its spiritual significance, became a powerful symbol mobilized to garner support. Ultimately, the customary territory splitting succeeded not because of the dominance of a single actor, but because this network of interests mutually reinforced one another.
Co-Authors Anastacia Patricia Novlina Nurak Carolina Augi Widya Putri I Ketut Darma I Wayan Gede Suacana I Wayan Sudana Made Yaya Sawitri Marsitadewi, Komang Ema Ni Wayan Desi Budha Jayanti Ni Wayan Sirimiati Putu Novita Dewi Lestari Sari, Ni Made Kartika Wijaya, Chintiya Meydayanti