Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.461
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Humano: Research Journal Jurnal Penelitian Kesehatan Suara Forikes Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Ius Constituendum Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling Jurnal Geocivic Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) KHAIRUN LAW JOURNAL Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Journal of Global Pharma Technology Jurnal Jurisprudence Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Faisal, Faisal
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Khairun
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
THE ROLE OF FISHERY SUPERVISORS IN RESOLVING ILLEGAL AND DESTRUCTIVE FISHING CRIMES IN NORTH MALUKU, INDONESIA Faisal Faisal; Robert Lengkong Weku; Dewi Suyatni; Nurlaila Kadarwati Papuluwa; Nur Aida Ikrima; Arief Budiono; Warda Said
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i6.4505

Abstract

Indonesia’s Marine Fisheries Resources Supervisory Agency is a government institution under the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries which is committed to continuing to combat illegal fishing and destructive fishing, considering that illegal fishing activities that often occur are fish theft by foreign fishing vessels originating from several neighboring countries. The aim of this research is to analyze the role of fishery supervisors in supervising illegal fishing and destructive fishing practices in North Maluku Province. This was empirical legal research which utilizes both literature review and fieldwork, including interviews. The research results demonstrate the urgency of criminal law's function as an ultimum remedium. To support the realization of sustainable development in the fisheries sector, it is necessary to regulate alternative sanctions for perpetrators of illegal and destructive fishing that are anticipatory in nature. These alternative sanctions can take the form of sanctions aimed at social and economic improvements and repair of damage to fish resources and their ecosystems caused by illegal and destructive fishing practices. Fishery supervisors have the role in supervising illegal and destructive fishing practices in North Maluku Province. The Fishery Supervisory law enforcement system and partners have the role in stopping illegal fishing practices and destructive fishing in North Maluku Province.
Criminal Sanctions in the Application of Electronic Ticketing Using CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) Recording by Satlantas Polda Maluku Utara Muhammad Mufti; Dewi Suyatni; Faisal Faisal
Khairun Law Journal Volume 4 Issue 2, March 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v4i2.3101

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the criminal sanctions against electronic traffic ticket offenders using CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) recordings and what obstacles are experienced by the North Maluku Regional Police in the application of electronic ticket penalties using CCTV (Closed Circuit Television) recordings. The type of research used in this research is empirical normative research type. Location This research was conducted at the North Maluku Police Traffic Unit. In addition, researchers also conducted direct interviews with the community regarding the application of electronic ticketing by the North Maluku Police Traffic Unit which was recently implemented in Ternate City. Then, the data obtained were analyzed descriptively qualitatively. Based on the pre-research conducted by researchers, the e-ticket system used by the North Maluku Police Traffic Police is regulated in article 272 of Law number 22 of 2009 concerning road traffic and transportation, the application of e-ticketing through CCTV footage is not yet fully effective because it has only been implemented in one city out of 10 municipalities in North Maluku Province, namely Ternate City, and is still in the socialization period, but what researchers highlight is the application of e-ticketing penalties that have not been clearly regulated by the traffic law. How are the criminal sanctions applied by the North Maluku Police Traffic Unit, if the vehicle recorded by CCTV is not the legal owner listed on the vehicle registration documents (Vehicle Registration Certificate), how is the application of traffic penalties against vehicles or offenders who are sanctioned criminal. One of the principles of criminal law is that there is no crime without error, that a person can only be punished for his actions if there is an error in himself. Whether the offender driving the vehicle at that time, not the legal owner of the vehicle listed on the vehicle registration certificate, is given a criminal sanction. Or is it the owner of the vehicle who must be responsible for the negligence of the offender? The obstacle experienced by the North Maluku Police Traffic Unit is the absence of a traffic regulation that clearly regulates e-ticketing penalties
Judicial Reasoning on Criminal Sanctions in Court Decision: Comparation between Indonesia and Uzbekistan Faisal Faisal; Turdialiev Mukhammad Ali Polatjon Ogl
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 15, No. 2, December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v15i2.13649

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the Study: This study aims to provide an in-depth analysis on the judicial reasoning and ratio decidendi in Decision No. 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Lbh on juvenile theft in Indonesia, especially regarding how judges interpret the element of offense, assess the risk of recidivism, and balance child protection and the need to maintain social order. This study also places this decision in a comparative context with the practice of juvenile penalization in Uzbekistan to strengthen the analysis. Methodology: This research employed the normative-juridical method with a case approach on a decision on a juvenile crime in Indonesia. The analysis was added with a statute approach on the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Court System, the Indonesian Criminal Code, and the Criminal Code of Uzbekistan. It also applied the conceptual approach, which encompasses the restorative justice theory, the best interest of the child theory, and the penalization theory. The analysis was conducted on a criminal case of theft in Indonesia, which involved children as perpetrators  It also analyzed a juvenile criminal case of theft in Uzbekistan and its Criminal Code as a comparison. The primary legal materials consisted of Indonesian court decisions and a juvenile court decision in Uzbekistan. The secondary legal materials consisted of scientific journals, official papers, and relevant literary materials. The technique of analysis was carried out in a descriptive-qualitative manner to reconstruct judges’ juridical considerations and the ratio decidendi structure. Results: Results show that judges arrange reasoning through three main pillars: (1) evidencing of the offense element and the fulfillment of the aggravation element, (2) recidivism is a determinant that increases the criminogenic risk escalation. Thus, it demands a firmer intervention, and (3) the integration of Correctional Centers’ recommendations to guarantee that correctional activities for children are conducted in a structured environment. The decision states that for juvenile crimes, the imprisonment sanction is not sensed as a retributive sanction, but rather as a corrective instrument that is still based on the principle of the best interests of the child. Comparative analyses show that Uzbekistan faces a similar dilemma: restorative policies still give room for the selective use of imprisonment sanctions in the case of recidivism. Applications of this Study: This research provides an empirical reference for policymakers, academicians, and legal practitioners to understand the pattern of judges’ argumentation in juvenile cases. It also serves as a basis to strengthen policies on proportional penalization that are oriented towards rehabilitative actions and are responsive to the risk of recidivism. These findings are relevant to formulate socio-psychological assessment policies, guidelines to juvenile sentencing, and to strengthen Correctional Centers’ recommendation mechanism. Novelty/Originality of this Study: The novelty of this research lies in the systematic analysis of the ratio decidendi of a juvenile sentencing decision, which considers children’s psychological condition and the principle of the best interest of the child in forming a decision order. This study also adds a comparative perspective with Uzbekistan that is seldom discussed in Indonesian jurisprudential literature, enriching the understanding on global trends related to juvenile sentencing. Keywords: Judicial Reasoning, Ratio Decidendi, Juvenile Sentencing, Juvenile Criminal Court System, Child Offenders.   ABSTRAK Tujuan Studi: Studi ini bertujuan untuk memberikan analisis mendalam tentang penalaran yudisial dan ratio decidendi dalam Keputusan No. 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Lbh tentang pencurian oleh anak di Indonesia, khususnya mengenai bagaimana hakim menafsirkan unsur tindak pidana, menilai risiko residivisme, dan menyeimbangkan perlindungan anak dan kebutuhan untuk menjaga ketertiban umum. Studi ini juga menempatkan keputusan ini dalam konteks komparatif dengan praktik penindakan anak di Uzbekistan untuk memperkuat analisis. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif-yuridis dengan pendekatan kasus pada keputusan tentang kejahatan anak di Indonesia. Analisis ditambahkan dengan pendekatan undang-undang pada Undang-Undang tentang Sistem Pengadilan Pidana Anak, KUHP Indonesia, dan KUHP Uzbekistan. Penelitian ini juga menerapkan pendekatan konseptual, yang mencakup teori keadilan restoratif, teori kepentingan terbaik anak, dan teori penindakan. Analisis ini dilakukan pada kasus pidana pencurian di Indonesia yang melibatkan anak-anak sebagai pelaku (Putusan Pengadilan No. 4/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Lbh). Analisis ini juga menganalisis kasus pidana pencurian anak di Uzbekistan dan KUHP Uzbekistan sebagai perbandingan. Materi hukum primer terdiri dari putusan pengadilan Indonesia dan putusan pengadilan anak di Uzbekistan. Materi hukum sekunder terdiri dari jurnal ilmiah, dokumen resmi, dan literatur terkait. Teknik analisis dilakukan secara deskriptif-kualitatif untuk merekonstruksi pertimbangan yuridis hakim dan struktur ratio decidendi. Hasil: Hasil menunjukkan bahwa hakim menyusun penalaran melalui tiga pilar utama: (1) pembuktian unsur tindak pidana dan pemenuhan unsur pemberatan, (2) residivisme merupakan determinan yang meningkatkan eskalasi risiko kriminogenik. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan intervensi yang lebih tegas, dan (3) integrasi rekomendasi Lembaga Pemasyarakatan untuk menjamin bahwa kegiatan pemasyarakatan bagi anak-anak dilakukan dalam lingkungan yang terstruktur. Keputusan tersebut menyatakan bahwa untuk kejahatan anak, sanksi penjara tidak dianggap sebagai sanksi pembalasan, melainkan sebagai instrumen korektif yang masih berdasarkan prinsip kepentingan terbaik anak. Analisis komparatif menunjukkan bahwa Uzbekistan menghadapi dilema serupa: kebijakan restoratif masih memberikan ruang untuk penggunaan sanksi penjara secara selektif dalam kasus residivisme. Aplikasi Studi Ini: Penelitian ini memberikan referensi empiris bagi para pembuat kebijakan, akademisi, dan praktisi hukum untuk memahami pola argumentasi hakim dalam kasus anak. Penelitian ini juga berfungsi sebagai dasar untuk memperkuat kebijakan tentang hukuman proporsional yang berorientasi pada tindakan rehabilitatif dan responsif terhadap risiko residivisme. Temuan ini relevan untuk merumuskan kebijakan penilaian sosial-psikologis, pedoman untuk penjatuhan hukuman terhadap anak, dan untuk memperkuat mekanisme rekomendasi Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas Studi Ini: Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis sistematis mengenai ratio decidendi dalam putusan hukuman anak, yang mempertimbangkan kondisi psikologis anak dan prinsip kepentingan terbaik anak dalam membentuk suatu putusan. Studi ini juga menambahkan perspektif komparatif dengan Uzbekistan yang jarang dibahas dalam literatur yurisprudensi Indonesia, memperkaya pemahaman tentang tren global terkait dengan hukuman anak. Kata Kunci: Penalaran Yudisial, Ratio Decidendi, Hukuman Anak, Sistem Pengadilan Pidana Anak, Pelaku Kejahatan Anak
Legal Considerations from Judges in Supreme Court Decree No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 Concerning the Acquittal of Exhibitionism Perpetrators and Their Implications as a Jurisprudence Sultan Alwan; Jamal Hi Arsad; Rusdin Alauddin; Faisal Faisal; Fatma Laha; Amirudin Umasangaji
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1401

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to provide a juridical analysis and the implications of the Supreme Court Decision Number 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013, where an exhibitionist perpetrator was declared to have a mental illness and he could not be held responsible. Methodology: This research used a normative juridical method with a library research approach. It was a descriptive study, which aimed to provide insight into the implication of judges in Supreme Court Decree No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 for the case exhibitionism as a jurisprudence.  Results: Based on the results of the Supreme Court Decision, the judge was wrong in placing exhibitionism as an excuse for eliminating criminal liability. This was based on theories and opinions which say that exhibitionism is not included in the provisions as a reason for eliminating criminal liability because exhibitionism is a type of disorder that is different from the disorders contained in the provisions regarding reasons for criminal elimination, i.e., Article 44 of the Criminal Code concerning the ability to be responsible. Exhibitionism is a sexual disorder, as opposed to a type of psychiatric disorder or psychosis contained in Article 44 of the Criminal Code. The judge also failed to base his decision on an examination by a psychiatrist who has the expertise to accurately determine the perpetrator’s mental condition. Applications of this study: This paper can be applied to prevent future occurrences of similar cases, where exhibitionists are not held accountable for their actions. This may bring more harm than good because exhibitionists will feel they have the freedom to disturb public peace by carrying out exhibitionism. Novelty/Originality of this study: No previous researchers have studied this decision and its implications. Keywords: legal consideration; supreme court; exhibitionism; implications; jurisprudence.   ABSTRAK  Tujuan: Artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan analisis yuridis dan implikasi dari Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013, dimana seorang pelaku eksibisionis dinyatakan sakit jiwa dan tidak dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban.  Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian kepustakaan. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif, yang bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman tentang implikasi hakim dalam Keputusan Mahkamah Agung No. 85 K/Pid.Sus/2013 terhadap kasus eksibisionisme sebagai yurisprudensi.  Hasil: Berdasarkan hasil Putusan MA, hakim salah menempatkan eksibisionisme sebagai dalih penghapusan pertanggungjawaban pidana. Hal ini didasarkan pada teori dan pendapat yang mengatakan bahwa eksibisionisme tidak termasuk dalam ketentuan sebagai alasan penghapusan pertanggungjawaban pidana karena eksibisionisme merupakan jenis gangguan yang berbeda dengan gangguan yang terdapat dalam ketentuan mengenai alasan penghapusan pidana yaitu Pasal 44 KUHP tentang kesanggupan untuk bertanggung jawab. Eksibisionisme adalah gangguan seksual, berbeda dengan jenis gangguan kejiwaan atau psikosis yang terdapat dalam Pasal 44 KUHP. Hakim juga tidak mendasarkan putusannya pada pemeriksaan psikiater yang memiliki keahlian untuk menentukan secara akurat kondisi kejiwaan pelaku.  Aplikasi penelitian ini : Artikel ini dapat diterapkan untuk mencegah kejadian serupa di masa mendatang, di mana eksibisionis tidak bertanggung jawab atas tindakan mereka. Hal ini mungkin membawa lebih banyak kerugian karena eksibisionis akan merasa memiliki kebebasan untuk mengganggu ketentraman masyarakat dengan melakukan eksibisionisme  Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Tidak ada peneliti sebelumnya yang mempelajari keputusan ini dan implikasinya.  Kata kunci: pertimbangan hukum; Mahkamah Agung; eksibisionisme; implikasi; yurisprudensi
Sriwedari Mosque Land Dispute, Surakarta Land Law Study Arvian Putra Ramadhan; Arief Budiono; Robert Lengkong Weku; Jamal Hi Arsad; Faisal Faisal
Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Proceeding International Conference Restructuring and Transforming Law
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal certainty in the land sector is indeed a necessity that must exist, but researchers have found that there are many individuals taking advantage of the weakening of law enforcement which has resulted in an increase in several land disputes. The aim of this research is to identify the factors causing land disputes at the Sriwedari Mosque in Surakarta. This research is research that uses sociological legal methods with a qualitative descriptive approach which was carried out on Jl. Slamet Riyadi Taman Sriwedari, Surakarta city in March-May 2023 using data collection techniques, namely literature study and interviews. Meanwhile, data analysis techniques utilize comparative studies. Based on the research results, the researchers concluded that the chronology of the Sriwedari land, which is now a problem regarding land disputes, was originally purchased by Paku Buwono (PB) This right to land ownership is what caused the land dispute at the Sriwedari Mosque in Surakarta and the construction of the mosque to stop.
Implementation of Legal Protection for Employees Experiencing Workplace Accidents Faris Faturahman Putra; Arief Budiono; Gamar Muhdar; Jamal Hi Arsad; Robert Lengkong Weku; Faisal Faisal
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 3 (2026): OCTOBER
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i3.13813

Abstract

  This study aims to analyze the implementation of legal protection for employees experiencing workplace accidents at HCP Ltd. and to evaluate the extent to which the company fulfills workers’ rights in accordance with Indonesian labor regulations. The findings demonstrate that HCP Ltd. has formally implemented legal protection through employee participation in the BPJS Employment program, provision of medical treatment access, continuation of wage payments during recovery periods, and maintenance of employment relationships for injured workers. However, the implementation of such protection remains predominantly procedural and reactive, indicating a substantial gap between formal legal compliance and the substantive fulfillment of workers’ rights. Delays in Work Accident Insurance (JKK) claims, limited employee understanding of labor protection mechanisms, inconsistent occupational safety and health (OSH) supervision, and the absence of structured psychological rehabilitation reflect that worker protection has not yet fulfilled the due diligence standard required within contemporary labor governance. The novelty of this research lies in its empirical and micro-level examination of labor protection effectiveness within a specific corporate setting, thereby moving beyond conventional normative labor law studies that primarily emphasize statutory adequacy without critically assessing practical implementation. Theoretically, this study contributes to the development of labor law scholarship by strengthening the discourse on substantive legal protection, corporate due diligence obligations, and human-centered occupational safety governance. Practically, this research recommends strengthening internal OSH supervision, institutionalizing worker legal education, accelerating administrative claim mechanisms, and integrating psychological rehabilitation into post-accident recovery systems to ensure more effective, sustainable, and justice-oriented worker protection.
The Legal Position of Foso and Boboso Customary Criminal Sanctions within the Framework of the National Criminal Code in the Jurisdiction of the Sultanate of Ternate Faisal Faisal; Robert Lengkong Weku; Nurlaila Kadarwati Papuluwa; Isyana Kurniasari Koronas; Arief Budiono
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3705

Abstract

Foso and Boboso have functional customary legal force within the scope of the Ternate customary community as informal law (living law) to maintain the order of the Ternate customary community, North Maluku. This study analyzes: (1) the legal position of the customary criminal sanctions of foso and boboso in the Se Atorang customary tradition in the Ternate Sultanate of North Maluku and (2) the prospects and challenges of transforming customary criminal law as additional punishment in Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code in the Ternate Sultanate of North Maluku. The research method used in this study is an empirical legal research method with a live case study approach. The results of the study indicate that the origin of Article 66 paragraph (1) letter f provides recognition of customary sanctions against perpetrators of criminal acts. However, there are problems in its application. This is because customary criminal sanctions, known in Ternate customary law as "Foso se Boboso," are based on the Adat se-Atorang philosophy and the principle of the relationship between the Sultan and the People, which prioritizes the implementation of the "Ngofa se Nyeku" custom. Violations of norms, ethics, etiquette (politeness), and customary law by ngofa se nyeku members will be subject to tiered customary sanctions. Initial sanctions include stern warnings, advice, or guidance from traditional elders or the customary council (fala raha) or spiritual leaders (sowohi) within the customary structure of the sultanate in North Maluku.
Co-Authors Abdul Ismail Amirudin Umasangaji Anshar Anshar Arief Budiono Arvian Putra Ramadhan Faris Faturahman Putra Fatma Laha Gamar Muhdar Isyana Kurniasari Koronas Jamal Hi Arsad Jamal Hi. Arsyad Muhammad Mufti Nur Aida Ikrima Nurlaila Kadarwati Papuluwa Nurlaila Kadarwati Papuluwa Puji Rahayu Subandi Rasti Amalia Faruk robert lengkong weku Rusdi Hasan Rusdin Alauddin Rustam Hasyim, Rustam Sophian Yahya Selajar Sultan Alwan Suwarti Suwarti Suyatni, Dewi Turdialiev Mukhammad Ali Polatjon Ogl Warda Said