Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Journal of SouthEast Asian Human Rights Warta Pengabdian Indonesian Journal of International Law Yuridika Syiah Kuala Law Journal
Amira Paripurna
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Yuridika

 1 
PROFESIONALISME POLRI DALAM PENERAPAN WEWENANG DISKRESI DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN (STUDI KASUS PENCURIAN KAKAO, PENCURIAN BIJI KAPUK, DAN PENCURIAN SEMANGKA) Iqbal Felisiano; Amira Paripurna
Yuridika Vol. 25 No. 3 (2010): Volume 25 Nomor 3 September 2010
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (359.551 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v25i3.258

Abstract

Police discretion by definition is the power to make decisions of policy and practice. Police have the choice to enforce certain laws and how they will be enforced. Discretion is bounded by norms (professional nor ms, community norms,  legal norms, moral norms). Officers will exercise discretion in situations here the facts or people involved don not necessarily line up with the law.  Discretion is exercised far more in speeding cases, vandalism, domestic violence or juvenile cases rather than homicide, rape case, thievery, robbery. Officers often feel minor  offenses are more about educating citizens, whereas serious offenders deserve the full punishment of the law. If a police officer uses his/her discretionary power correctly, not only will it help the police officer in their situation, it will help the general community as well.Key words : discretion, police officer
The Architecture of Counter-Terrorism Legislation in India and Indonesia: An Analysis of Issues and Challenges Bedi, Shruti; Paripurna, Amira
Yuridika Vol. 40 No. 1 (2025): Volume 40 No 1, January 2025
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v40i1.50985

Abstract

Counter-terrorism law is a major challenge to any country since it incorporates a wide range of regulations of domestic law. Its multi-layered nature makes it imperative for academics to highlight comparative insights with a view to resolving the threat. The changes in the mode, tactics, and targets of terror attacks have evolved and become more complex; terrorist cell groups continue to grow, and the nature of terrorist networks across national borders ensures that terrorism cannot be tackled effectively by ordinary means. This paper employs comparative doctrinal research that aims to analyze and understand the similarities and differences between legal rules in India and Indonesia. This paper takes on the challenging endeavor of scrutinizing the counter-terrorism legislation of both countries. It delves into the obstacles confronted by both countries, offering systematically organized details on their current anti-terrorism legislations. The aim and objective of such discussion is to draw inspiration and perceptions from one another’s jurisdiction to evolve a better law. The result of this study shows that, in India and Indonesia, the current counter-terrorism legislation heavily supports the authority of the State, often at the expense of civil liberties for citizens. It is essential to develop a holistic counter-terrorism framework that allows the State to effectively thwart terrorists and their activities, while simultaneously safeguarding the fundamental rights.
Co-Authors Astutik Astutik Bedi, Shruti Cahyani, Prilian Didik Endro Purwoleksono Ekawestri Prajwalita Widiati Iqbal Felisiano, Iqbal Masitoh Indriani Muhammad Zaidun Regina Kartika Sari Riza Alifianto Sapta Aprilianto Sarwirini . Suheryadi, Bambang Toetik Rahayu